[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: [Summary] UTF-8 Question: e with acute accent should requ
In article <006501c80214$2a2a5d00$8901a8c0@aldebaran> you write: >> >It is not correct to say that a Unicode character can be either an >> >"ASCII character" or a "non-ASCII character". It is better >> to say that >> >some Unicode characters (those with codes below 128) have a >> >corresponding character in ASCII. >> On what do you base this assertion? Why do you think the >> ASCII characters are not the same characters that appear in >> Unicode? >That's not what I said nor what I think. So if the ASCII characters *are* the same ones that appear in Unicode, why is it not correct to say that Unicode characters are either ASCII or non-ASCII characters? -- Richard -- "Consideration shall be given to the need for as many as 32 characters in some alphabets" - X3.4, 1963.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|