XML-DEV Mailing List Archive by date - September, 2006

• RE: convert dom4j.Document to net.sf.saxon.om.NodeInfo
  • From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@h...> on 27 Sep 2006 12:51:58 -0000
• XML-DEV list: was [RE: convert dom4j.Document to net.sf.saxon.om.NodeInfo]
  • From peter murray-rust <pm286@c...> on 27 Sep 2006 07:44:11 -0000
• RE: convert dom4j.Document to net.sf.saxon.om.NodeInfo
  • From Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...> on 27 Sep 2006 07:28:25 -0000
• RE: convert dom4j.Document to net.sf.saxon.om.NodeInfo
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 27 Sep 2006 06:53:47 -0000
• Re: convert dom4j.Document to net.sf.saxon.om.NodeInfo
  • From "David Lyon" <david.lyon@p...> on 26 Sep 2006 23:50:14 -0000
• Re: Xlink Isn't Dead
  • From Robert Koberg <rob@k...> on 26 Sep 2006 22:53:12 -0000
• RE: convert dom4j.Document to net.sf.saxon.om.NodeInfo
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 26 Sep 2006 22:47:27 -0000
• Re: convert dom4j.Document to net.sf.saxon.om.NodeInfo
  • From "Justin Edelson" <justinedelson@g...> on 26 Sep 2006 21:24:32 -0000
• convert dom4j.Document to net.sf.saxon.om.NodeInfo
  • From Brian Caruso <bdc34@c...> on 26 Sep 2006 20:40:30 -0000
• RE: Xlink Isn't Dead
  • From "Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@b...> on 26 Sep 2006 19:36:09 -0000
• Re: Xlink Isn't Dead
  • From Richard Salz <rsalz@u...> on 26 Sep 2006 19:00:50 -0000
• Re: Xlink Isn't Dead
  • From Ari Krupnik <ari@c...> on 26 Sep 2006 18:34:37 -0000
• Re: Transforming the whole soap response
  • From "andrew welch" <andrew.j.welch@g...> on 26 Sep 2006 16:41:49 -0000
• Re: Transforming the whole soap response
  • From Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...> on 26 Sep 2006 16:30:12 -0000
• Transforming the whole soap response
  • From "andrew welch" <andrew.j.welch@g...> on 26 Sep 2006 16:27:27 -0000
• [Announce] Stylus Studio 2007 XML Enterprise Suite Released: XML Pipeline, XML Publishing and Data Conversion API's
  • From "Stylus Studio" <stylusstudio@g...> on 26 Sep 2006 16:00:20 -0000
• RE: Xlink Isn't Dead
  • From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@h...> on 26 Sep 2006 15:11:36 -0000
• Re: Xlink Isn't Dead
  • From "Peter Hunsberger" <peter.hunsberger@g...> on 26 Sep 2006 14:39:46 -0000
• Re: Xlink Isn't Dead
  • From Robert Koberg <rob@k...> on 26 Sep 2006 13:57:19 -0000
• Re: Xlink Isn't Dead
  • From "Peter Hunsberger" <peter.hunsberger@g...> on 26 Sep 2006 13:39:46 -0000
• Re: Experience with Spreadsheet-WriteExcel-FromXML-1.1..
  • From "David Lyon" <david.lyon@p...> on 26 Sep 2006 11:29:16 -0000
• Re: Experience with Spreadsheet-WriteExcel-FromXML-1.1..
  • From Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...> on 26 Sep 2006 09:53:24 -0000
• RE: Xlink Isn't Dead
  • From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@h...> on 26 Sep 2006 09:38:08 -0000
• Re: Experience with Spreadsheet-WriteExcel-FromXML-1.1..
  • From ht@m... (Henry S. Thompson) on 26 Sep 2006 09:37:49 -0000
• [ANN] CodeSynthesis XSD 2.3.0 - Open-source XML Schema to C++ compiler
  • From Boris Kolpackov <boris@c...> on 26 Sep 2006 08:50:12 -0000
• Re: Experience with Spreadsheet-WriteExcel-FromXML-1.1..
  • From "David Lyon" <david.lyon@p...> on 26 Sep 2006 01:06:30 -0000
• Re: Reading binary formatted data
  • From "David Lyon" <david.lyon@p...> on 26 Sep 2006 01:04:28 -0000
• Reading binary formatted data
  • From Vincent Forbes <vwfst55@g...> on 26 Sep 2006 00:32:28 -0000
• RE: Xlink Isn't Dead
  • From <Nicholas.Ardlie@g...> on 26 Sep 2006 00:09:10 -0000
• Re: Experience with Spreadsheet-WriteExcel-FromXML-1.1..
  • From Rick Marshall <rjm@z...> on 25 Sep 2006 23:12:46 -0000
• Re: RelaxNG validators?
  • From Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@g...> on 25 Sep 2006 21:09:26 -0000
• RelaxNG validators?
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...> on 25 Sep 2006 20:58:34 -0000
• Re: Xlink Isn't Dead
  • From Dave Pawson <davep@d...> on 25 Sep 2006 17:01:36 -0000
• RE: Xlink Isn't Dead
  • From sterling <sstouden@t...> on 25 Sep 2006 16:43:07 -0000
• Re: Xlink Isn't Dead
  • From James Fuller <jim.fuller@r...> on 25 Sep 2006 16:11:24 -0000
• Re: Xlink Isn't Dead
  • From peter murray-rust <pm286@c...> on 25 Sep 2006 16:02:59 -0000
• Re: Xlink Isn't Dead
  • From Ben Trafford <ben@p...> on 25 Sep 2006 15:55:30 -0000
• Re: Xlink Isn't Dead
  • From James Fuller <jim.fuller@r...> on 25 Sep 2006 15:51:22 -0000
• Re: Xlink Isn't Dead
  • From Ben Trafford <ben@p...> on 25 Sep 2006 15:34:03 -0000
• Re: Xlink Isn't Dead
  • From peter murray-rust <pm286@c...> on 25 Sep 2006 15:31:11 -0000
• Re: Experience with Spreadsheet-WriteExcel-FromXML-1.1..
  • From Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...> on 25 Sep 2006 15:24:59 -0000
• RE: Xlink Isn't Dead
  • From Ben Trafford <ben@p...> on 25 Sep 2006 15:20:36 -0000
• Re: Experience with Spreadsheet-WriteExcel-FromXML-1.1..
  • From "David Lyon" <david.lyon@p...> on 25 Sep 2006 14:47:17 -0000
• Re: Experience with Spreadsheet-WriteExcel-FromXML-1.1..
  • From Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...> on 25 Sep 2006 14:12:51 -0000
• Re: Experience with Spreadsheet-WriteExcel-FromXML-1.1..
  • From "David Lyon" <david.lyon@p...> on 25 Sep 2006 13:41:47 -0000
• Re: Experience with Spreadsheet-WriteExcel-FromXML-1.1..
  • From Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...> on 25 Sep 2006 11:22:20 -0000
• RE: Xlink Isn't Dead
  • From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@h...> on 25 Sep 2006 10:04:44 -0000
• RE: Xlink Isn't Dead
  • From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@h...> on 25 Sep 2006 09:57:50 -0000
• RE: Xlink Isn't Dead
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 25 Sep 2006 07:04:02 -0000
• RE: Xlink Isn't Dead
  • From <Nicholas.Ardlie@g...> on 25 Sep 2006 04:44:12 -0000
• Experience with Spreadsheet-WriteExcel-FromXML-1.1..
  • From david.lyon@p... on 25 Sep 2006 04:33:01 -0000
• Status of link doc and vacation messages.
  • From Ben Trafford <ben@p...> on 25 Sep 2006 03:16:43 -0000
• RE: Xlink Isn't Dead
  • From Ben Trafford <ben@p...> on 25 Sep 2006 03:12:21 -0000
• Re: XLink the SAX way... (was: XLink isn't dead)
  • From Ben Trafford <ben@p...> on 25 Sep 2006 03:10:01 -0000
• RE: Xlink Isn't Dead
  • From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@h...> on 24 Sep 2006 23:48:31 -0000
• XLink the SAX way... (was: XLink isn't dead)
  • From Tatu Saloranta <cowtowncoder@y...> on 24 Sep 2006 23:46:00 -0000
• Re: Xlink Isn't Dead
  • From Ari Krupnik <ari@c...> on 24 Sep 2006 23:13:46 -0000
• Re: Xlink Isn't Dead
  • From Ben Trafford <ben@p...> on 24 Sep 2006 22:03:03 -0000
• Re: Xlink Isn't Dead
  • From peter murray-rust <pm286@c...> on 24 Sep 2006 18:11:56 -0000
• Re: Xlink Isn't Dead
  • From Ben Trafford <ben@p...> on 24 Sep 2006 17:44:24 -0000
• Re: Xlink Isn't Dead
  • From Dave Pawson <davep@d...> on 24 Sep 2006 17:41:34 -0000
• Re: processing instruction with 'xml' target
  • From <juanrgonzaleza@c...> on 24 Sep 2006 10:18:33 -0000
• Re: processing instruction with 'xml' target
  • From <juanrgonzaleza@c...> on 24 Sep 2006 10:01:26 -0000
• Re: processing instruction with 'xml' target
  • From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...> on 24 Sep 2006 09:07:09 -0000
• Re: Xlink Isn't Dead
  • From "Ben Trafford" <ben@p...> on 24 Sep 2006 04:45:56 -0000
• Re: processing instruction with 'xml' target
  • From Tatu Saloranta <cowtowncoder@y...> on 24 Sep 2006 01:39:40 -0000
• Re: Xlink Isn't Dead
  • From "Alexander Johannesen" <alexander.johannesen@g...> on 24 Sep 2006 00:46:43 -0000
• RE: Xlink Isn't Dead
  • From Ben Trafford <ben@p...> on 23 Sep 2006 19:55:54 -0000
• RE: Xlink Isn't Dead
  • From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@h...> on 23 Sep 2006 17:19:32 -0000
• Re: Xlink Isn't Dead
  • From Ben Trafford <ben@p...> on 23 Sep 2006 14:18:07 -0000
• Re: Xlink Isn't Dead
  • From "Alexander Johannesen" <alexander.johannesen@g...> on 23 Sep 2006 13:22:20 -0000
• Re: processing instruction with 'xml' target
  • From <juanrgonzaleza@c...> on 23 Sep 2006 13:13:54 -0000
• Re: Xlink Isn't Dead
  • From Jirka Kosek <jirka@k...> on 23 Sep 2006 08:55:24 -0000
• RE: Xlink Isn't Dead
  • From peter murray-rust <pm286@c...> on 23 Sep 2006 07:59:39 -0000
• RE: Xlink Isn't Dead
  • From Ben Trafford <ben@p...> on 23 Sep 2006 06:02:05 -0000
• RE: Xlink Isn't Dead
  • From peter murray-rust <pm286@c...> on 23 Sep 2006 05:51:18 -0000
• RE: Xlink Isn't Dead
  • From Ben Trafford <ben@p...> on 23 Sep 2006 05:21:59 -0000
• RE: Xlink Isn't Dead
  • From "Bob DuCharme" <bob@s...> on 23 Sep 2006 05:04:41 -0000
• RE: Xlink Isn't Dead
  • From "Bob DuCharme" <bob@s...> on 23 Sep 2006 04:50:45 -0000
• RE: Xlink Isn't Dead
  • From Ben Trafford <ben@p...> on 23 Sep 2006 02:18:01 -0000
• RE: Xlink Isn't Dead
  • From Ben Trafford <ben@p...> on 23 Sep 2006 02:16:53 -0000
• RE: Xlink Isn't Dead
  • From "Bob DuCharme" <bob@s...> on 23 Sep 2006 01:47:45 -0000
• RE: Xlink Isn't Dead
  • From "Nathan Young -X \(natyoung - Artizen at Cisco\)" <natyoung@c...> on 23 Sep 2006 00:50:57 -0000
• Re: Xlink Isn't Dead
  • From Ben Trafford <ben@p...> on 23 Sep 2006 00:29:12 -0000
• Re: Xlink Isn't Dead
  • From "Alexander Johannesen" <alexander.johannesen@g...> on 23 Sep 2006 00:17:13 -0000
• Re: Xlink Isn't Dead
  • From Ben Trafford <ben@p...> on 23 Sep 2006 00:04:41 -0000
• Re: Xlink Isn't Dead
  • From Ben Trafford <ben@p...> on 23 Sep 2006 00:01:52 -0000
• Re: Xlink Isn't Dead
  • From "Alexander Johannesen" <alexander.johannesen@g...> on 22 Sep 2006 23:23:16 -0000
• Re: Xlink Isn't Dead
  • From "Alexander Johannesen" <alexander.johannesen@g...> on 22 Sep 2006 23:17:08 -0000
• RE: Xlink Isn't Dead
  • From Ben Trafford <ben@p...> on 22 Sep 2006 22:22:43 -0000
• RE: Xlink Isn't Dead
  • From "Bob DuCharme" <bob@s...> on 22 Sep 2006 21:51:31 -0000
• RE: Xlink Isn't Dead
  • From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@h...> on 22 Sep 2006 21:06:27 -0000
• Xlink Isn't Dead
  • From "Campbell, Richard S." <RCampbell@F...> on 22 Sep 2006 19:27:30 -0000
• Re: Xlink Isn't Dead
  • From "Peter Hunsberger" <peter.hunsberger@g...> on 22 Sep 2006 19:19:39 -0000
• RE: Xlink Isn't Dead
  • From Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...> on 22 Sep 2006 18:58:33 -0000
• Re: Xlink Isn't Dead
  • From Norman Walsh <ndw@n...> on 22 Sep 2006 18:09:23 -0000
• RE: Xlink Isn't Dead
  • From "Nathan Young -X \(natyoung - Artizen at Cisco\)" <natyoung@c...> on 22 Sep 2006 18:09:15 -0000
• RE: Xlink Isn't Dead
  • From Tatu Saloranta <cowtowncoder@y...> on 22 Sep 2006 17:58:06 -0000
• Re: Xlink Isn't Dead
  • From Richard Salz <rsalz@u...> on 22 Sep 2006 17:45:21 -0000
• Re: Xlink Isn't Dead
  • From "Bob DuCharme" <bob@s...> on 22 Sep 2006 17:42:44 -0000
• Re: Xlink Isn't Dead
  • From "Peter Hunsberger" <peter.hunsberger@g...> on 22 Sep 2006 17:38:23 -0000
• RE: Xlink Isn't Dead
  • From Ben Trafford <ben@p...> on 22 Sep 2006 17:03:46 -0000
• RE: Xlink Isn't Dead
  • From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@h...> on 22 Sep 2006 16:59:17 -0000
• RE: Xlink Isn't Dead
  • From Ben Trafford <ben@p...> on 22 Sep 2006 16:51:15 -0000
• RE: Xlink Isn't Dead
  • From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@h...> on 22 Sep 2006 16:49:35 -0000
• RE: Xlink Isn't Dead
  • From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@h...> on 22 Sep 2006 16:46:26 -0000
• RE: Xlink Isn't Dead
  • From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@h...> on 22 Sep 2006 16:37:23 -0000
• RE: Xlink Isn't Dead
  • From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@h...> on 22 Sep 2006 16:36:31 -0000
• Re: Xlink Isn't Dead
  • From Elliotte Harold <elharo@m...> on 22 Sep 2006 16:33:12 -0000
• Re: Xlink Isn't Dead
  • From Ari Krupnik <ari@c...> on 22 Sep 2006 15:52:01 -0000
• UBL Code List Value Validation Methodology version 0.7 Draft 1
  • From "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@C...> on 22 Sep 2006 15:01:19 -0000
• Re: XPointer: which namespace bindings in the result?
  • From Florent Georges <darkman_spam@y...> on 22 Sep 2006 14:03:36 -0000
• Re: Xlink Isn't Dead
  • From "Peter Hunsberger" <peter.hunsberger@g...> on 22 Sep 2006 13:57:46 -0000
• RE: XPointer: which namespace bindings in the result?
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 22 Sep 2006 13:55:37 -0000
• XPointer: which namespace bindings in the result?
  • From Florent Georges <darkman_spam@y...> on 22 Sep 2006 13:38:36 -0000
• Re: Xlink Isn't Dead
  • From Philippe Poulard <Philippe.Poulard@s...> on 22 Sep 2006 12:47:49 -0000
• Re: Xlink Isn't Dead
  • From Frans Englich <frans.englich@t...> on 22 Sep 2006 11:41:34 -0000
• Re: Xlink Isn't Dead
  • From Ben Trafford <ben@p...> on 22 Sep 2006 11:37:16 -0000
• Re: Xlink Isn't Dead
  • From "Alexander Johannesen" <alexander.johannesen@g...> on 22 Sep 2006 11:33:56 -0000
• RE: Xlink Isn't Dead
  • From Ben Trafford <ben@p...> on 22 Sep 2006 11:18:04 -0000
• Re: Xlink Isn't Dead
  • From James Fuller <jim.fuller@r...> on 22 Sep 2006 11:17:21 -0000
• RE: Xlink Isn't Dead
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 22 Sep 2006 11:11:15 -0000
• RE: Xlink Isn't Dead
  • From Ben Trafford <ben@p...> on 22 Sep 2006 09:56:18 -0000
• RE: Xlink Isn't Dead
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 22 Sep 2006 09:52:46 -0000
• RE: Xlink Isn't Dead
  • From Ben Trafford <ben@p...> on 22 Sep 2006 09:28:31 -0000
• RE: Xlink Isn't Dead
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 22 Sep 2006 09:16:28 -0000
• RE: Xlink Isn't Dead
  • From Ben Trafford <ben@p...> on 22 Sep 2006 09:01:23 -0000
• RE: Xlink Isn't Dead
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 22 Sep 2006 08:44:53 -0000
• Xlink Isn't Dead
  • From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@h...> on 22 Sep 2006 02:38:35 -0000
• Re: setting up xml bank
  • From peter murray-rust <pm286@c...> on 21 Sep 2006 08:05:38 -0000
• seting up xml bank
  • From "=?UTF-8?B?VG9tYXogS2xhbsSNbmlr?=" <slimt@e...> on 20 Sep 2006 18:59:15 -0000
• PLAN-X 2007: Call for Papers and Demos (Deadline Extended)
  • From Torsten Grust <grust@i...> on 20 Sep 2006 08:33:28 -0000
• Re: ANN: Amara XML Toolkit 1.1.9
  • From Uche Ogbuji <uche@o...> on 19 Sep 2006 17:45:59 -0000
• Re: Redefine and Import used together - is this valid?
  • From ht@i... (Henry S. Thompson) on 19 Sep 2006 16:19:19 -0000
• Re: Redefine and Import used together - is this valid?
  • From ht@i... (Henry S. Thompson) on 19 Sep 2006 11:36:25 -0000
• [ANN] xnsdoc 1.2 - XML Schema documentation generator
  • From forge@b... on 19 Sep 2006 00:02:22 -0000
• Re: Find all Namespace Declarations
  • From Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@g...> on 18 Sep 2006 20:29:49 -0000
• Find all Namespace Declarations
  • From "K. W. Landry" <kwlandry@g...> on 18 Sep 2006 20:24:11 -0000
• Re: Suggestion test - WAS: Patents on XML software, file formats, schemas, vocabularies
  • From Tatu Saloranta <cowtowncoder@y...> on 18 Sep 2006 06:03:31 -0000
• Re: Suggestion test - WAS: Patents on XML software, fileformats, schemas, vocabularies
  • From sterling <sstouden@t...> on 18 Sep 2006 04:03:50 -0000
• RE: processing instruction with 'xml' target
  • From Richard Salz <rsalz@u...> on 17 Sep 2006 04:14:26 -0000
• Re: processing instruction with 'xml' target
  • From Chris Burdess <d09@h...> on 16 Sep 2006 17:24:05 -0000
• RE: processing instruction with 'xml' target
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 16 Sep 2006 10:47:15 -0000
• RE: processing instruction with 'xml' target
  • From <juanrgonzaleza@c...> on 16 Sep 2006 10:06:42 -0000
• ANN: Amara XML Toolkit 1.1.9
  • From Uche Ogbuji <uche@o...> on 16 Sep 2006 03:59:14 -0000
• RE: processing instruction with 'xml' target
  • From Tatu Saloranta <cowtowncoder@y...> on 15 Sep 2006 22:54:41 -0000
• Re: processing instruction with 'xml' target
  • From Ari Krupnik <ari@c...> on 15 Sep 2006 20:54:47 -0000
• RE: Redefine and Import used together - is this valid?
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 15 Sep 2006 17:56:08 -0000
• RE: Redefine and Import used together - is this valid?
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 15 Sep 2006 16:38:33 -0000
• ANN: Free XQuery Tutorial: Using XQuery in Your Architecture
  • From Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...> on 15 Sep 2006 15:40:10 -0000
• [ANN] XTech WebDev London, 31 October 2006
  • From Edd Dumbill <edd@u...> on 15 Sep 2006 09:51:26 -0000
• RE: processing instruction with 'xml' target
  • From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@h...> on 15 Sep 2006 09:48:22 -0000
• Re: processing instruction with 'xml' target
  • From Frank Richards <frank@t...> on 15 Sep 2006 08:45:01 -0000
• RE: processing instruction with 'xml' target
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 15 Sep 2006 08:06:58 -0000
• RE: processing instruction with 'xml' target
  • From <juanrgonzaleza@c...> on 15 Sep 2006 07:36:00 -0000
• Re: Open XML Markup Compatibility
  • From david.lyon@p... on 15 Sep 2006 00:41:03 -0000
• RE: processing instruction with 'xml' target
  • From "Nathan Young -X \(natyoung - Artizen at Cisco\)" <natyoung@c...> on 14 Sep 2006 23:54:18 -0000
• RE: processing instruction with 'xml' target
  • From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@h...> on 14 Sep 2006 23:48:18 -0000
• RE: processing instruction with 'xml' target
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 14 Sep 2006 23:08:05 -0000
• RE: processing instruction with 'xml' target
  • From <juanrgonzaleza@c...> on 14 Sep 2006 18:13:33 -0000
• Re: processing instruction with 'xml' target
  • From Liam Quin <liam@w...> on 14 Sep 2006 17:28:35 -0000
• RE: processing instruction with 'xml' target
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 14 Sep 2006 16:39:14 -0000
• Re: processing instruction with 'xml' target
  • From <juanrgonzaleza@c...> on 14 Sep 2006 16:37:43 -0000
• Re: processing instruction with 'xml' target
  • From <juanrgonzaleza@c...> on 14 Sep 2006 16:30:04 -0000
• Re: processing instruction with 'xml' target
  • From <juanrgonzaleza@c...> on 14 Sep 2006 16:11:01 -0000
• Re: processing instruction with 'xml' target
  • From David Carlisle <davidc@n...> on 14 Sep 2006 16:11:00 -0000
• Re: processing instruction with 'xml' target
  • From richard@i... (Richard Tobin) on 14 Sep 2006 16:09:51 -0000
• Re: processing instruction with 'xml' target
  • From richard@i... (Richard Tobin) on 14 Sep 2006 16:06:44 -0000
• Re: processing instruction with 'xml' target
  • From David Carlisle <davidc@n...> on 14 Sep 2006 15:50:58 -0000
• Re: processing instruction with 'xml' target
  • From <juanrgonzaleza@c...> on 14 Sep 2006 15:19:45 -0000
• Re: processing instruction with 'xml' target
  • From <juanrgonzaleza@c...> on 14 Sep 2006 14:44:04 -0000
• XML 2006 - 10 year evolution
  • From "Marion Elledge" <MElledge@i...> on 14 Sep 2006 14:43:27 -0000
• Re: processing instruction with 'xml' target
  • From <juanrgonzaleza@c...> on 14 Sep 2006 14:36:59 -0000
• Re: processing instruction with 'xml' target
  • From Chris Burdess <d09@h...> on 14 Sep 2006 12:35:59 -0000
• Re: processing instruction with 'xml' target
  • From David Carlisle <davidc@n...> on 14 Sep 2006 09:05:30 -0000
• Re: processing instruction with 'xml' target
  • From <juanrgonzaleza@c...> on 14 Sep 2006 08:56:03 -0000
• Re: processing instruction with "xml" target
  • From Ari Krupnik <ari@c...> on 13 Sep 2006 22:25:30 -0000
• Re: processing instruction with "xml" target
  • From richard@i... (Richard Tobin) on 13 Sep 2006 22:10:04 -0000
• Re: processing instruction with "xml" target
  • From richard@i... (Richard Tobin) on 13 Sep 2006 21:21:11 -0000
• seeking Ruby on Rails instructor
  • From "Marion Elledge" <MElledge@i...> on 13 Sep 2006 21:06:50 -0000
• Re: Open XML Markup Compatibility
  • From "Fraser Goffin" <goffinf@g...> on 13 Sep 2006 21:05:45 -0000
• processing instruction with "xml" target
  • From Ari Krupnik <ari@c...> on 13 Sep 2006 21:05:38 -0000
• RE: Open XML Markup Compatibility
  • From "Dave Orchard" <orchard@p...> on 13 Sep 2006 18:37:16 -0000
• RE: SGML complexity
  • From "Nathan Young -X \(natyoung - Artizen at Cisco\)" <natyoung@c...> on 13 Sep 2006 16:49:39 -0000
• Archives borked?
  • From ht@i... (Henry S. Thompson) on 13 Sep 2006 14:36:55 -0000
• Re: workflow definition language - is there a leader
  • From Sacha Schlegel <sacha_ml@s...> on 13 Sep 2006 14:12:55 -0000
• RE: workflow definition language - is there a leader
  • From "Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@b...> on 13 Sep 2006 13:14:39 -0000
• Re: Open XML Markup Compatibility
  • From "Fraser Goffin" <goffinf@g...> on 13 Sep 2006 12:50:01 -0000
• workflow definition language - is there a leader
  • From Robert Koberg <rob@k...> on 13 Sep 2006 12:49:42 -0000
• Re: Open XML Markup Compatibility
  • From "Fraser Goffin" <goffinf@g...> on 13 Sep 2006 12:28:55 -0000
• Re: SGML complexity
  • From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...> on 13 Sep 2006 09:30:30 -0000
• RE: SGML complexity
  • From <juanrgonzaleza@c...> on 13 Sep 2006 08:33:58 -0000
• Re: Open XML Markup Compatibility
  • From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...> on 13 Sep 2006 08:16:22 -0000
• Re: Open XML Markup Compatibility
  • From "David Lyon" <david.lyon@p...> on 13 Sep 2006 00:17:17 -0000
• Re: Open XML Markup Compatibility
  • From Greg Hunt <greg@f...> on 12 Sep 2006 22:23:54 -0000
• Re: SGML complexity
  • From Rick Marshall <rjm@z...> on 12 Sep 2006 21:21:21 -0000
• Re: SGML complexity
  • From Chris Burdess <d09@h...> on 12 Sep 2006 19:49:03 -0000
• RE: SGML complexity
  • From "Nathan Young -X \(natyoung - Artizen at Cisco\)" <natyoung@c...> on 12 Sep 2006 18:25:44 -0000
• RE: SGML complexity
  • From <juanrgonzaleza@c...> on 12 Sep 2006 18:06:31 -0000
• FW: [x3d-public] X3D Earth Requirements Workshop call for participation
  • From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@h...> on 12 Sep 2006 18:01:24 -0000
• RE: SGML complexity
  • From "Nathan Young -X \(natyoung - Artizen at Cisco\)" <natyoung@c...> on 12 Sep 2006 17:04:59 -0000
• Re: Whitespace character references and XSD normalization
  • From Mike Williams <mike.williams@g...> on 12 Sep 2006 16:18:18 -0000
• Re: Whitespace character references and XSD normalization
  • From richard@i... (Richard Tobin) on 12 Sep 2006 16:13:52 -0000
• Whitespace character references and XSD normalization
  • From Mike Williams <mike.williams@g...> on 12 Sep 2006 15:52:48 -0000
• Re: SGML complexity
  • From Frank Manola <fmanola@a...> on 12 Sep 2006 15:35:49 -0000
• RE: SGML complexity
  • From "Rudder, Doug" <Doug.Rudder@w...> on 12 Sep 2006 14:32:45 -0000
• Re: SGML complexity
  • From Tei <oscar.vives@g...> on 12 Sep 2006 12:17:31 -0000
• Re: Re: insanse discussion with alex Was: SGML complexity
  • From "Alexander Johannesen" <alexander.johannesen@g...> on 12 Sep 2006 12:00:45 -0000
• Re: insanse discussion with alex Was: SGML complexity
  • From <juanrgonzaleza@c...> on 12 Sep 2006 11:54:43 -0000
• Re: Open XML Markup Compatibility
  • From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...> on 12 Sep 2006 10:08:19 -0000
• Re: SGML complexity
  • From Philippe Poulard <Philippe.Poulard@s...> on 12 Sep 2006 09:43:57 -0000
• Open XML Markup Compatibility
  • From "Fraser Goffin" <goffinf@h...> on 12 Sep 2006 09:29:22 -0000
• Re: SGML complexity
  • From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...> on 12 Sep 2006 08:38:31 -0000
• Re: SGML complexity
  • From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...> on 12 Sep 2006 08:29:48 -0000
• Re: SGML complexity
  • From "Alexander Johannesen" <alexander.johannesen@g...> on 12 Sep 2006 00:53:04 -0000
• Re: SGML complexity
  • From sterling <sstouden@t...> on 11 Sep 2006 20:42:36 -0000
• RE: 8 xml questions
  • From "Nathan Young -X \(natyoung - Artizen at Cisco\)" <natyoung@c...> on 11 Sep 2006 17:44:16 -0000
• Re: 8 xml questions
  • From <juanrgonzaleza@c...> on 11 Sep 2006 15:42:44 -0000
• Re: SGML complexity
  • From <juanrgonzaleza@c...> on 11 Sep 2006 15:32:45 -0000
• Re: SGML complexity
  • From <juanrgonzaleza@c...> on 11 Sep 2006 15:24:46 -0000
• 8 xml questions
  • From "LAKKAM Vinay \(AXA-I\)" <Vinay.Lakkam@a...> on 11 Sep 2006 15:15:21 -0000
• Re: SGML complexity
  • From <juanrgonzaleza@c...> on 11 Sep 2006 14:38:21 -0000
• Re: SGML complexity
  • From Philippe Poulard <Philippe.Poulard@s...> on 11 Sep 2006 13:52:18 -0000
• Re: SGML complexity
  • From Tei <oscar.vives@g...> on 11 Sep 2006 13:27:44 -0000
• Re: a report on any xml file, what information is useful?
  • From ALT Mobile <dev@a...> on 11 Sep 2006 12:08:38 -0000
• Re: SGML complexity
  • From "Alexander Johannesen" <alexander.johannesen@g...> on 11 Sep 2006 07:35:05 -0000
• RE: a report on any xml file, what information is useful?
  • From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@h...> on 11 Sep 2006 03:09:27 -0000
• Re: a report on any xml file, what information is useful?
  • From ALT Mobile <dev@a...> on 11 Sep 2006 02:27:48 -0000
• Re: XML schema Management
  • From Ari Krupnik <ari@c...> on 10 Sep 2006 05:42:49 -0000
• Re: A Taxonomy of Deviance?
  • From "Rick Jelliffe" <rjelliffe@a...> on 9 Sep 2006 17:22:41 -0000
• Dear Patner,
  • From BARRISTER MARK COLLINS <mark20collins@y...> on 9 Sep 2006 17:10:33 -0000
• Re: SGML complexity
  • From <juanrgonzaleza@c...> on 9 Sep 2006 09:49:28 -0000
• [announce] An Afternoon of XML !!
  • From "Stylus Studio" <stylusstudio@g...> on 9 Sep 2006 00:37:52 -0000
• Re: XML schema Management
  • From Guillaume Lebleu <gl@b...> on 8 Sep 2006 21:04:44 -0000
• Re: XML schema Management
  • From Jeff Rafter <lists@j...> on 8 Sep 2006 20:17:27 -0000
• RE: XML schema Management
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 8 Sep 2006 18:32:16 -0000
• Re: XML schema Management
  • From "Fraser Goffin" <goffinf@g...> on 8 Sep 2006 18:24:53 -0000
• Re: XML schema Management
  • From "Fraser Goffin" <goffinf@g...> on 8 Sep 2006 18:13:23 -0000
• Re: XML schema Management
  • From "Fraser Goffin" <goffinf@g...> on 8 Sep 2006 18:01:26 -0000
• RE: XML schema Management
  • From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@h...> on 8 Sep 2006 17:41:35 -0000
• RE: XML schema Management
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 8 Sep 2006 17:39:17 -0000
• RE: XML schema Management
  • From Danny Vint <dvint@d...> on 8 Sep 2006 17:15:48 -0000
• RE: XML schema Management
  • From "Nathan Young -X \(natyoung - Artizen at Cisco\)" <natyoung@c...> on 8 Sep 2006 16:58:05 -0000
• RE: XML schema Management
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 8 Sep 2006 16:45:25 -0000
• XML schema Management
  • From "Fraser Goffin" <goffinf@h...> on 8 Sep 2006 16:30:37 -0000
• Re: SGML complexity
  • From Philippe Poulard <Philippe.Poulard@s...> on 8 Sep 2006 15:23:42 -0000
• Re: SGML complexity
  • From <juanrgonzaleza@c...> on 8 Sep 2006 14:48:47 -0000
• Re: SGML complexity
  • From <juanrgonzaleza@c...> on 8 Sep 2006 14:48:27 -0000
• Re: SGML complexity
  • From David Carlisle <davidc@n...> on 8 Sep 2006 14:19:59 -0000
• RE: SGML complexity
  • From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@h...> on 8 Sep 2006 14:13:30 -0000
• Re: SGML complexity
  • From <juanrgonzaleza@c...> on 8 Sep 2006 14:10:49 -0000
• RE: SGML complexity
  • From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@h...> on 8 Sep 2006 14:07:38 -0000
• Re: SGML complexity
  • From Philippe Poulard <Philippe.Poulard@s...> on 8 Sep 2006 14:04:47 -0000
• RE: SGML complexity
  • From <juanrgonzaleza@c...> on 8 Sep 2006 13:50:04 -0000
• Re: SGML complexity
  • From James Fuller <jim.fuller@r...> on 8 Sep 2006 12:57:55 -0000
• RE: SGML complexity
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 8 Sep 2006 12:55:14 -0000
• RE: SGML complexity
  • From <juanrgonzaleza@c...> on 8 Sep 2006 12:52:02 -0000
• RE: SGML complexity
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 8 Sep 2006 12:37:03 -0000
• Re: SGML complexity
  • From <juanrgonzaleza@c...> on 8 Sep 2006 12:35:17 -0000
• RE: SGML complexity
  • From sterling <sstouden@t...> on 8 Sep 2006 12:11:29 -0000
• RE: SGML complexity
  • From <juanrgonzaleza@c...> on 8 Sep 2006 10:39:16 -0000
• RE: SGML complexity
  • From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@h...> on 8 Sep 2006 09:44:57 -0000
• Re: SGML complexity
  • From Tei <oscar.vives@g...> on 8 Sep 2006 09:41:48 -0000
• How to convert a MS Word document to .FO
  • From "Jorge L.R." <iraultza_ya@h...> on 8 Sep 2006 08:49:49 -0000
• RE: SGML complexity
  • From sterling <sstouden@t...> on 8 Sep 2006 05:31:32 -0000
• Re: SGML complexity
  • From "Alexander Johannesen" <alexander.johannesen@g...> on 8 Sep 2006 03:10:15 -0000
• RE: SGML complexity
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 7 Sep 2006 22:33:30 -0000
• RE: a report on any xml file, what information is useful?
  • From "Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@b...> on 7 Sep 2006 21:53:22 -0000
• Re: best xml parser to use
  • From Tatu Saloranta <cowtowncoder@y...> on 7 Sep 2006 21:23:32 -0000
• Re: Re: best xml parser to use
  • From Tatu Saloranta <cowtowncoder@y...> on 7 Sep 2006 21:20:40 -0000
• Re: SGML complexity
  • From Rick Marshall <rjm@z...> on 7 Sep 2006 21:11:45 -0000
• Re: a report on any xml file, what information is useful?
  • From Richard Salz <rsalz@u...> on 7 Sep 2006 18:00:52 -0000
• XSLFO app
  • From "Jorge L.R." <iraultza_ya@h...> on 7 Sep 2006 17:16:12 -0000
• RE: SGML complexity
  • From "Nathan Young -X \(natyoung - Artizen at Cisco\)" <natyoung@c...> on 7 Sep 2006 17:15:15 -0000
• [ANN] Editix 5.0 - XML Editor and XSLT Debugger
  • From JAPISoft <public2@j...> on 7 Sep 2006 15:30:46 -0000
• Re: a report on any xml file, what information is useful?
  • From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...> on 7 Sep 2006 14:15:16 -0000
• Re: a report on any xml file, what information is useful?
  • From Frans Englich <frans.englich@t...> on 7 Sep 2006 13:58:35 -0000
• a report on any xml file, what information is useful?
  • From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...> on 7 Sep 2006 13:48:53 -0000
• Re: SGML complexity
  • From Rick Marshall <rjm@z...> on 7 Sep 2006 13:40:46 -0000
• Re: SGML complexity
  • From Frans Englich <frans.englich@t...> on 7 Sep 2006 13:19:22 -0000
• Re: SGML complexity
  • From <juanrgonzaleza@c...> on 7 Sep 2006 13:11:04 -0000
• Re: SGML complexity
  • From <juanrgonzaleza@c...> on 7 Sep 2006 12:54:12 -0000