• From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>
• To: "'Nathan Young -X \(natyoung - Artizen at Cisco\)'" <natyoung@c...>,"'Fraser Goffin'" <goffinf@h...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 18:39:23 +0100

> 
> So are you talking about auto generating a bunch of schemas 
> based on a core description of the data model and a set of 
> rules for getting from the core description to each 
> individual case you need?  Or am I misunderstanding?

Yes. But perhaps not so much a core description of the data model, more a
set of reusable and parameterizable components that can be included in
messages, combined with a description of each message in terms of which
components to include (as required, optional, or repeating).

One area where I'm still very ambivalent is whether different messages
should use the same namespace, given that they might apply different rules
to the same elements.

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XML schema Management
    • From: "Fraser Goffin" <goffinf@g...>

• References:
  • RE: XML schema Management
    • From: "Nathan Young -X \(natyoung - Artizen at Cisco\)" <natyoung@c...>