Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
At 07:17 PM 9/22/2006, Alexander Johannesen wrote:
>"I don't care about semantics; I only care about meaning!"
That's actually not what I was saying, at all.
>Ontologies are data models (mostly used as systems of logic inference)
I know what ontologies are. I just think that they represent
the briar patch.
>that uses linking as _part_ of it. Linking by itself means very
>little, in HTML, XML or otherwise. I suspect this debate is once again
Are you using "means" in the ontological sense? As in, the
presence of link doesn't define what that link means?
>Nothing at all. It's *all* about the application of such, even in
>XHTML where it means *nothing* until the browser application use the
>data for something.
Then we're in agreement.
>It sounds like
>you want there to be more generic application specific things in XML,
>not less. I'm of the "less" opinion, but only because, well, I'm in
>the ontologies camp. :)
I actually don't see how you're finding a conflict between
getting the styling languages to do something smart with links and
the modelling of more generic ontologies.
--->Ben
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |
