[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Xlink Isn't Dead

• From: Ben Trafford <ben@p...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 11:55:27 -0400

At 11:51 AM 9/25/2006, James Fuller wrote:
>dont know if RDDL has some part to play here?

         The essential problem I have with RDDL is the requirement 
that roles be stated as URIs. I mean, that's fine if you're only 
trying to use it to define namespaces (its intended purpose), but not 
so good for things like CML, for example.

--->Ben 

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Xlink Isn't Dead
    • From: James Fuller <jim.fuller@r...>

• References:
  • RE: Xlink Isn't Dead
    • From: Ben Trafford <ben@p...>
  • RE: Xlink Isn't Dead
    • From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>
  • RE: Xlink Isn't Dead
    • From: Ben Trafford <ben@p...>
  • Re: Xlink Isn't Dead
    • From: James Fuller <jim.fuller@r...>