• From: <juanrgonzaleza@c...>
• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 11:05:57 -0700 (PDT)

natyoung - Artizen at Cisco\ said:
>
> As far as I can tell there are only three substantive points:
>
>  - XML is more verbose than some other markup languages
>  - XSL may not be the best choice for every programming task
>  - XSL may or may not be a programming language
>
> The first two points are widely accepted.

Then is not widely accepted that "XSL may or may not be a programming
language"?

Interesting...

> ------------>N
>
>
> .:||:._.:||:._.:||:._.:||:._.:||:._.:||:._.:||:._.:||:._.:||:._.:||:._.:
> ||:.
>
> Nathan Young
> Cisco.com->Interface Development
> A: ncy1717
> E: natyoung@c...
>

Juan R.

Center for CANONICAL |SCIENCE)

• References:
  • RE: SGML complexity
    • From: "Nathan Young -X \(natyoung - Artizen at Cisco\)" <natyoung@c...>