[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Xlink Isn't Dead

• From: Dave Pawson <davep@d...>
• To: Len Bullard <cbullard@h...>
• Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 18:15:07 +0100

Len Bullard wrote:
> This thread is going to the same places it has always gone.  The Petri dish
> is becoming stale.

Which is curious on this list.
I feel sure that there is sufficient exposure and experience here to 
define a set of requirements for xlink
and implement them, as was the case with sax.
The need is there (IMHO);  I can't recall that being in doubt?


I guess all that is missing is a David Megginson to take the lead and 
put forward the (a?) proposal.
Bob,  Jirka, Ben, someone else?


regards 

-- 
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Xlink Isn't Dead
    • From: "Len Bullard" <cbullard@h...>
  • Re: Xlink Isn't Dead
    • From: Ben Trafford <ben@p...>

• References:
  • RE: Xlink Isn't Dead
    • From: "Len Bullard" <cbullard@h...>