• From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>
• To: <juanrgonzaleza@c...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 00:07:59 +0100

> I agree in novices, but it appears to be not limited to early 
> 1998 since it spread until 2006:
> 
> [http://www.xmlwriter.net/xml_guide/processing_instruction.shtml]
> 
> [http://www.xmlwriter.net/xml_guide/xml_declaration.shtml]
> 
> [http://aspalliance.com/515_Working_with_XML_Processing_Instru
> ctions_in_C]
> 
> [http://www.javacommerce.com/displaypage.jsp?name=pi.sql&id=18238]
> 
> [http://www.wdvl.com/Authoring/Languages/XML/Tutorials/Intro/d
> eclare.html]
> 
> [http://www.xml.su/]
> 
> This is unfortunate.

Yes, there's lots of rubbish on the net. What a wonderful discovery. Perhaps
in future you'll argue your case on its merits rather than by trying to
count the number of people with a particular view.

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: processing instruction with 'xml' target
    • From: <juanrgonzaleza@c...>
  • RE: processing instruction with 'xml' target
    • From: "Len Bullard" <cbullard@h...>

• References:
  • RE: processing instruction with 'xml' target
    • From: <juanrgonzaleza@c...>