[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

XML-DEV Mailing List Archive by thread - September, 2006

  • Re: FYI: AJAX and XML 3D, From Rex Brooks <rexb@s...> on 2 Sep 2006 00:08:58 -0000
  • Followups by message-id references
  • TimBL's Speech, From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@h...> on 2 Sep 2006 13:59:24 -0000
  • A Taxonomy of Deviance?, From Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...> on 2 Sep 2006 15:36:46 -0000
  • Followups by message-id references
  • Re: A Taxonomy of Deviance?, From Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...> on 5 Sep 2006 18:02:23 -0000
  • Followups by message-id references
  • Re: A Taxonomy of Deviance?, From "Rick Jelliffe" <rjelliffe@a...> on 9 Sep 2006 17:22:41 -0000
  • Re: SGML complexity, From Dave Pawson <davep@d...> on 2 Sep 2006 16:45:26 -0000
  • Followups by message-id references
  • RE: SGML complexity, From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 2 Sep 2006 17:01:23 -0000
  • xslt 2.0 impl. complexity (was Re: SGML complexity), From Tatu Saloranta <cowtowncoder@y...> on 2 Sep 2006 23:20:45 -0000
  • Followups by subject
  • RE: SGML complexity, From "Nathan Young -X \(natyoung - Artizen at Cisco\)" <natyoung@c...> on 7 Sep 2006 17:15:15 -0000
  • Followups by message-id references
  • Re: SGML complexity, From Rick Marshall <rjm@z...> on 7 Sep 2006 21:11:45 -0000
  • Followups by message-id references
  • RE: SGML complexity, From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 7 Sep 2006 22:33:30 -0000
  • RE: SGML complexity, From sterling <sstouden@t...> on 8 Sep 2006 05:31:32 -0000
  • Re: SGML complexity, From Tei <oscar.vives@g...> on 8 Sep 2006 09:41:48 -0000
  • RE: SGML complexity, From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@h...> on 8 Sep 2006 09:44:57 -0000
  • RE: SGML complexity, From sterling <sstouden@t...> on 8 Sep 2006 12:11:29 -0000
  • RE: SGML complexity, From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 8 Sep 2006 12:37:03 -0000
  • RE: SGML complexity, From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@h...> on 8 Sep 2006 14:07:38 -0000
  • RE: SGML complexity, From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@h...> on 8 Sep 2006 14:13:30 -0000
  • RE: SGML complexity, From <juanrgonzaleza@c...> on 8 Sep 2006 12:52:02 -0000
  • RE: SGML complexity, From <juanrgonzaleza@c...> on 8 Sep 2006 10:39:16 -0000
  • RE: SGML complexity, From "Nathan Young -X \(natyoung - Artizen at Cisco\)" <natyoung@c...> on 12 Sep 2006 17:04:59 -0000
  • Followups by message-id references
  • RE: SGML complexity, From <juanrgonzaleza@c...> on 12 Sep 2006 18:06:31 -0000
  • RE: SGML complexity, From "Nathan Young -X \(natyoung - Artizen at Cisco\)" <natyoung@c...> on 12 Sep 2006 18:25:44 -0000
  • Followups by message-id references
  • Re: SGML complexity, From Chris Burdess <d09@h...> on 12 Sep 2006 19:49:03 -0000
  • Re: SGML complexity, From Rick Marshall <rjm@z...> on 12 Sep 2006 21:21:21 -0000
  • RE: SGML complexity, From <juanrgonzaleza@c...> on 13 Sep 2006 08:33:58 -0000
  • Followups by message-id references
  • Re: SGML complexity, From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...> on 13 Sep 2006 09:30:30 -0000
  • RE: SGML complexity, From "Nathan Young -X \(natyoung - Artizen at Cisco\)" <natyoung@c...> on 13 Sep 2006 16:49:39 -0000
  • Re: SGML complexity (was: RE: Re: Recognizing...), From Frans Englich <frans.englich@t...> on 4 Sep 2006 10:36:38 -0000
  • Followups by message-id references
  • Re: SGML complexity, From Elliotte Harold <elharo@m...> on 4 Sep 2006 14:24:21 -0000
  • Followups by message-id references
  • Re: SGML complexity, From <juanrgonzaleza@c...> on 4 Sep 2006 14:37:58 -0000
  • Followups by message-id references
  • Re: SGML complexity, From "Mukul Gandhi" <gandhi.mukul@g...> on 4 Sep 2006 15:01:16 -0000
  • Re: SGML complexity, From <juanrgonzaleza@c...> on 5 Sep 2006 12:24:42 -0000
  • Re: SGML complexity, From "Mukul Gandhi" <gandhi.mukul@g...> on 5 Sep 2006 16:02:50 -0000
  • Re: SGML complexity, From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...> on 6 Sep 2006 07:33:04 -0000
  • Re: SGML complexity, From "Mukul Gandhi" <gandhi.mukul@g...> on 6 Sep 2006 15:13:25 -0000
  • Re: SGML complexity, From Richard Salz <rsalz@u...> on 6 Sep 2006 15:29:43 -0000
  • Re: SGML complexity, From <juanrgonzaleza@c...> on 6 Sep 2006 10:36:55 -0000
  • Re: SGML complexity, From "Alexander Johannesen" <alexander.johannesen@g...> on 6 Sep 2006 10:41:48 -0000
  • Re: SGML complexity, From <juanrgonzaleza@c...> on 7 Sep 2006 10:14:13 -0000
  • Re: SGML complexity, From "Alexander Johannesen" <alexander.johannesen@g...> on 7 Sep 2006 10:53:23 -0000
  • Re: SGML complexity, From <juanrgonzaleza@c...> on 7 Sep 2006 12:54:12 -0000
  • Re: SGML complexity, From Rick Marshall <rjm@z...> on 7 Sep 2006 13:40:46 -0000
  • Re: SGML complexity, From "Alexander Johannesen" <alexander.johannesen@g...> on 8 Sep 2006 03:10:15 -0000
  • Re: SGML complexity, From <juanrgonzaleza@c...> on 8 Sep 2006 12:35:17 -0000
  • RE: SGML complexity, From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 8 Sep 2006 12:55:14 -0000
  • RE: SGML complexity, From <juanrgonzaleza@c...> on 8 Sep 2006 13:50:04 -0000
  • Re: SGML complexity, From James Fuller <jim.fuller@r...> on 8 Sep 2006 12:57:55 -0000
  • Re: SGML complexity, From <juanrgonzaleza@c...> on 8 Sep 2006 14:10:49 -0000
  • Re: SGML complexity, From Philippe Poulard <Philippe.Poulard@s...> on 8 Sep 2006 14:04:47 -0000
  • Re: SGML complexity, From David Carlisle <davidc@n...> on 8 Sep 2006 14:19:59 -0000
  • Re: SGML complexity, From <juanrgonzaleza@c...> on 8 Sep 2006 14:48:27 -0000
  • Re: SGML complexity, From <juanrgonzaleza@c...> on 8 Sep 2006 14:48:47 -0000
  • Re: SGML complexity, From Philippe Poulard <Philippe.Poulard@s...> on 8 Sep 2006 15:23:42 -0000
  • Re: SGML complexity, From <juanrgonzaleza@c...> on 9 Sep 2006 09:49:28 -0000
  • Re: SGML complexity, From "Alexander Johannesen" <alexander.johannesen@g...> on 11 Sep 2006 07:35:05 -0000
  • Re: SGML complexity, From Tei <oscar.vives@g...> on 11 Sep 2006 13:27:44 -0000
  • Re: SGML complexity, From sterling <sstouden@t...> on 11 Sep 2006 20:42:36 -0000
  • Re: SGML complexity, From Tei <oscar.vives@g...> on 12 Sep 2006 12:17:31 -0000
  • Re: SGML complexity, From <juanrgonzaleza@c...> on 11 Sep 2006 14:38:21 -0000
  • Re: SGML complexity, From <juanrgonzaleza@c...> on 11 Sep 2006 15:32:45 -0000
  • Re: SGML complexity, From "Alexander Johannesen" <alexander.johannesen@g...> on 12 Sep 2006 00:53:04 -0000
  • Re: insanse discussion with alex Was: SGML complexity, From <juanrgonzaleza@c...> on 12 Sep 2006 11:54:43 -0000
  • Re: Re: insanse discussion with alex Was: SGML complexity, From "Alexander Johannesen" <alexander.johannesen@g...> on 12 Sep 2006 12:00:45 -0000
  • RE: SGML complexity, From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 6 Sep 2006 10:48:34 -0000
  • RE: SGML complexity, From <juanrgonzaleza@c...> on 7 Sep 2006 10:40:00 -0000
  • Re: SGML complexity, From Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...> on 6 Sep 2006 10:57:26 -0000
  • Re: SGML complexity, From <juanrgonzaleza@c...> on 7 Sep 2006 10:52:52 -0000
  • RE: SGML complexity, From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 4 Sep 2006 15:02:58 -0000
  • RE: SGML complexity, From <juanrgonzaleza@c...> on 5 Sep 2006 11:33:22 -0000
  • RE: SGML complexity, From Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...> on 5 Sep 2006 12:09:57 -0000
  • Re: SGML complexity, From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...> on 5 Sep 2006 12:13:29 -0000
  • RE: SGML complexity, From <juanrgonzaleza@c...> on 6 Sep 2006 09:49:15 -0000
  • XSLFO app, From "Jorge L.R." <iraultza_ya@h...> on 7 Sep 2006 17:16:12 -0000
  • RE: SGML complexity, From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 5 Sep 2006 12:26:21 -0000
  • RE: SGML complexity, From <juanrgonzaleza@c...> on 6 Sep 2006 11:29:03 -0000
  • RE: SGML complexity, From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 6 Sep 2006 12:12:06 -0000
  • RE: SGML complexity, From <juanrgonzaleza@c...> on 7 Sep 2006 11:39:08 -0000
  • Re: SGML complexity, From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...> on 7 Sep 2006 11:44:21 -0000
  • Re: SGML complexity, From <juanrgonzaleza@c...> on 7 Sep 2006 13:11:04 -0000
  • Re: SGML complexity, From Frans Englich <frans.englich@t...> on 7 Sep 2006 13:19:22 -0000
  • Re: SGML complexity, From Philippe Poulard <Philippe.Poulard@s...> on 11 Sep 2006 13:52:18 -0000
  • Re: SGML complexity, From <juanrgonzaleza@c...> on 11 Sep 2006 15:24:46 -0000
  • Re: SGML complexity, From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...> on 12 Sep 2006 08:29:48 -0000
  • Re: SGML complexity, From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...> on 12 Sep 2006 08:38:31 -0000
  • RE: SGML complexity, From "Rudder, Doug" <Doug.Rudder@w...> on 12 Sep 2006 14:32:45 -0000
  • Re: SGML complexity, From Frank Manola <fmanola@a...> on 12 Sep 2006 15:35:49 -0000
  • Re: SGML complexity, From Philippe Poulard <Philippe.Poulard@s...> on 12 Sep 2006 09:43:57 -0000
  • [ANN] Editix 5.0 - XML Editor and XSLT Debugger, From JAPISoft <public2@j...> on 7 Sep 2006 15:30:46 -0000
  • RE: SGML complexity, From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 4 Sep 2006 14:43:46 -0000
  • Re: SGML complexity (was: RE: Re: Recognizing...), From Tatu Saloranta <cowtowncoder@y...> on 5 Sep 2006 04:42:40 -0000
  • Schematron and comma as a decimal delimiter, From Juha Ikävalko <juha.ikavalko@t...> on 4 Sep 2006 11:15:49 -0000
  • Followups by message-id references
  • RE: Schematron and comma as a decimal delimiter, From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 4 Sep 2006 11:24:41 -0000
  • Followups by message-id references
  • Re: Schematron and comma as a decimal delimiter, From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...> on 4 Sep 2006 12:06:16 -0000
  • Followups by message-id references
  • Re: Schematron and comma as a decimal delimiter, From Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...> on 5 Sep 2006 06:41:04 -0000
  • RE: Schematron and comma as a decimal delimiter, From Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...> on 5 Sep 2006 06:37:53 -0000
  • Relax NG test suite., From Dave Pawson <davep@d...> on 4 Sep 2006 12:09:31 -0000
  • Followups by message-id references
  • Re: Relax NG test suite., From Jeff Rafter <lists@j...> on 5 Sep 2006 07:51:11 -0000
  • Followups by message-id references
  • Re: Relax NG test suite., From Dave Pawson <davep@d...> on 5 Sep 2006 18:24:02 -0000
  • ifrs-gp 2006 - child abstract items, From bill palmer <palmer@e...> on 5 Sep 2006 17:21:02 -0000
  • RE: A Taxonomy of Deviance?, From "Nathan Young -X \(natyoung - Artizen at Cisco\)" <natyoung@c...> on 5 Sep 2006 18:13:04 -0000
  • XLINK instead of AJAX?, From walter kriha <walter@k...> on 6 Sep 2006 09:28:37 -0000
  • Followups by message-id references
  • Re: XLINK instead of AJAX?, From Tei <oscar.vives@g...> on 6 Sep 2006 11:04:32 -0000
  • Including a schema and its redefinition, From "Antoli, Leo" <Leo.Antoli@M...> on 6 Sep 2006 09:50:16 -0000
  • Followups by message-id references
  • Re: Including a schema and its redefinition, From Melvin Chin <mc@S...> on 6 Sep 2006 13:07:32 -0000
  • best xml parser to use, From petera <peter.anderson@e...> on 6 Sep 2006 13:10:13 -0000
  • Followups by message-id references
  • RE: best xml parser to use, From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 6 Sep 2006 13:44:54 -0000
  • Followups by message-id references
  • RE: best xml parser to use, From petera <peter.anderson@e...> on 6 Sep 2006 14:16:13 -0000
  • Followups by message-id references
  • RE: best xml parser to use, From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 6 Sep 2006 14:59:36 -0000
  • Re: best xml parser to use, From "Bob DuCharme" <bob@s...> on 6 Sep 2006 13:46:31 -0000
  • Re: best xml parser to use, From "K. W. Landry" <kwlandry@g...> on 6 Sep 2006 20:08:58 -0000
  • Followups by message-id references
  • Re: best xml parser to use, From "Justin Edelson" <justinedelson@g...> on 6 Sep 2006 21:01:50 -0000
  • Followups by message-id references
  • Re: best xml parser to use, From "K. W. Landry" <kwlandry@g...> on 6 Sep 2006 21:28:06 -0000
  • Re: best xml parser to use, From Stefan Tilkov <info@t...> on 7 Sep 2006 08:31:24 -0000
  • Followups by message-id references
  • Re: best xml parser to use, From Tatu Saloranta <cowtowncoder@y...> on 7 Sep 2006 21:23:32 -0000
  • Re: best xml parser to use, From petera <peter.anderson@e...> on 7 Sep 2006 08:28:53 -0000
  • Followups by message-id references
  • Re: best xml parser to use, From petera <peter.anderson@e...> on 7 Sep 2006 08:31:13 -0000
  • Re: Re: best xml parser to use, From Tatu Saloranta <cowtowncoder@y...> on 7 Sep 2006 21:20:40 -0000
  • RE: best xml parser to use, From "Spies, Brennan" <Brennan.Spies@e...> on 6 Sep 2006 19:26:14 -0000
  • a report on any xml file, what information is useful?, From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...> on 7 Sep 2006 13:48:53 -0000
  • Followups by message-id references
  • Re: a report on any xml file, what information is useful?, From Frans Englich <frans.englich@t...> on 7 Sep 2006 13:58:35 -0000
  • Followups by message-id references
  • Re: a report on any xml file, what information is useful?, From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...> on 7 Sep 2006 14:15:16 -0000
  • Re: a report on any xml file, what information is useful?, From Richard Salz <rsalz@u...> on 7 Sep 2006 18:00:52 -0000
  • Re: a report on any xml file, what information is useful?, From ALT Mobile <dev@a...> on 11 Sep 2006 02:27:48 -0000
  • Followups by message-id references
  • RE: a report on any xml file, what information is useful?, From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@h...> on 11 Sep 2006 03:09:27 -0000
  • Followups by message-id references
  • Re: a report on any xml file, what information is useful?, From ALT Mobile <dev@a...> on 11 Sep 2006 12:08:38 -0000
  • RE: a report on any xml file, what information is useful?, From "Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@b...> on 7 Sep 2006 21:53:22 -0000
  • Followups by message-id references
  • How to convert a MS Word document to .FO, From "Jorge L.R." <iraultza_ya@h...> on 8 Sep 2006 08:49:49 -0000
  • XML schema Management, From "Fraser Goffin" <goffinf@h...> on 8 Sep 2006 16:30:37 -0000
  • Followups by message-id references
  • RE: XML schema Management, From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 8 Sep 2006 16:45:25 -0000
  • Followups by message-id references
  • RE: XML schema Management, From Danny Vint <dvint@d...> on 8 Sep 2006 17:15:48 -0000
  • Followups by message-id references
  • RE: XML schema Management, From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@h...> on 8 Sep 2006 17:41:35 -0000
  • Re: XML schema Management, From "Fraser Goffin" <goffinf@g...> on 8 Sep 2006 18:01:26 -0000
  • Re: XML schema Management, From Jeff Rafter <lists@j...> on 8 Sep 2006 20:17:27 -0000
  • Re: XML schema Management, From Guillaume Lebleu <gl@b...> on 8 Sep 2006 21:04:44 -0000
  • RE: XML schema Management, From "Nathan Young -X \(natyoung - Artizen at Cisco\)" <natyoung@c...> on 8 Sep 2006 16:58:05 -0000
  • Followups by message-id references
  • RE: XML schema Management, From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 8 Sep 2006 17:39:17 -0000
  • Followups by message-id references
  • Re: XML schema Management, From "Fraser Goffin" <goffinf@g...> on 8 Sep 2006 18:24:53 -0000
  • Re: XML schema Management, From "Fraser Goffin" <goffinf@g...> on 8 Sep 2006 18:13:23 -0000
  • Followups by message-id references
  • RE: XML schema Management, From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 8 Sep 2006 18:32:16 -0000
  • Followups by message-id references
  • Re: XML schema Management, From Ari Krupnik <ari@c...> on 10 Sep 2006 05:42:49 -0000
  • [announce] An Afternoon of XML !!, From "Stylus Studio" <stylusstudio@g...> on 9 Sep 2006 00:37:52 -0000
  • Dear Patner,, From BARRISTER MARK COLLINS <mark20collins@y...> on 9 Sep 2006 17:10:33 -0000
  • 8 xml questions, From "LAKKAM Vinay \(AXA-I\)" <Vinay.Lakkam@a...> on 11 Sep 2006 15:15:21 -0000
  • Followups by message-id references
  • Re: 8 xml questions, From <juanrgonzaleza@c...> on 11 Sep 2006 15:42:44 -0000
  • RE: 8 xml questions, From "Nathan Young -X \(natyoung - Artizen at Cisco\)" <natyoung@c...> on 11 Sep 2006 17:44:16 -0000
  • Open XML Markup Compatibility, From "Fraser Goffin" <goffinf@h...> on 12 Sep 2006 09:29:22 -0000
  • Followups by message-id references
  • Re: Open XML Markup Compatibility, From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...> on 12 Sep 2006 10:08:19 -0000
  • Re: Open XML Markup Compatibility, From Greg Hunt <greg@f...> on 12 Sep 2006 22:23:54 -0000
  • Followups by message-id references
  • Re: Open XML Markup Compatibility, From "Fraser Goffin" <goffinf@g...> on 13 Sep 2006 12:28:55 -0000
  • Re: Open XML Markup Compatibility, From "David Lyon" <david.lyon@p...> on 13 Sep 2006 00:17:17 -0000
  • Followups by message-id references
  • Re: Open XML Markup Compatibility, From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...> on 13 Sep 2006 08:16:22 -0000
  • Re: Open XML Markup Compatibility, From "Fraser Goffin" <goffinf@g...> on 13 Sep 2006 12:50:01 -0000
  • Followups by message-id references
  • RE: Open XML Markup Compatibility, From "Dave Orchard" <orchard@p...> on 13 Sep 2006 18:37:16 -0000
  • Re: Open XML Markup Compatibility, From "Fraser Goffin" <goffinf@g...> on 13 Sep 2006 21:05:45 -0000
  • Re: Open XML Markup Compatibility, From david.lyon@p... on 15 Sep 2006 00:41:03 -0000
  • Whitespace character references and XSD normalization, From Mike Williams <mike.williams@g...> on 12 Sep 2006 15:52:48 -0000
  • Followups by message-id references
  • Re: Whitespace character references and XSD normalization, From richard@i... (Richard Tobin) on 12 Sep 2006 16:13:52 -0000
  • Followups by message-id references
  • Re: Whitespace character references and XSD normalization, From Mike Williams <mike.williams@g...> on 12 Sep 2006 16:18:18 -0000
  • FW: [x3d-public] X3D Earth Requirements Workshop call for participation, From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@h...> on 12 Sep 2006 18:01:24 -0000
  • workflow definition language - is there a leader, From Robert Koberg <rob@k...> on 13 Sep 2006 12:49:42 -0000
  • Followups by message-id references
  • Re: workflow definition language - is there a leader, From Sacha Schlegel <sacha_ml@s...> on 13 Sep 2006 14:12:55 -0000
  • RE: workflow definition language - is there a leader, From "Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@b...> on 13 Sep 2006 13:14:39 -0000
  • Archives borked?, From ht@i... (Henry S. Thompson) on 13 Sep 2006 14:36:55 -0000
  • processing instruction with "xml" target, From Ari Krupnik <ari@c...> on 13 Sep 2006 21:05:38 -0000
  • Followups by message-id references
  • Re: processing instruction with "xml" target, From richard@i... (Richard Tobin) on 13 Sep 2006 21:21:11 -0000
  • Followups by message-id references
  • Re: processing instruction with "xml" target, From richard@i... (Richard Tobin) on 13 Sep 2006 22:10:04 -0000
  • Re: processing instruction with "xml" target, From Ari Krupnik <ari@c...> on 13 Sep 2006 22:25:30 -0000
  • Re: processing instruction with 'xml' target, From <juanrgonzaleza@c...> on 14 Sep 2006 08:56:03 -0000
  • Followups by message-id references
  • Re: processing instruction with 'xml' target, From David Carlisle <davidc@n...> on 14 Sep 2006 09:05:30 -0000
  • Followups by message-id references
  • Re: processing instruction with 'xml' target, From <juanrgonzaleza@c...> on 14 Sep 2006 14:36:59 -0000
  • Re: processing instruction with 'xml' target, From <juanrgonzaleza@c...> on 14 Sep 2006 15:19:45 -0000
  • Followups by message-id references
  • Re: processing instruction with 'xml' target, From richard@i... (Richard Tobin) on 14 Sep 2006 16:06:44 -0000
  • Re: processing instruction with 'xml' target, From Liam Quin <liam@w...> on 14 Sep 2006 17:28:35 -0000
  • seeking Ruby on Rails instructor, From "Marion Elledge" <MElledge@i...> on 13 Sep 2006 21:06:50 -0000
  • Re: processing instruction with 'xml' target, From Chris Burdess <d09@h...> on 14 Sep 2006 12:35:59 -0000
  • Followups by message-id references
  • Re: processing instruction with 'xml' target, From <juanrgonzaleza@c...> on 14 Sep 2006 14:44:04 -0000
  • Followups by message-id references
  • Re: processing instruction with 'xml' target, From David Carlisle <davidc@n...> on 14 Sep 2006 15:50:58 -0000
  • Followups by message-id references
  • Re: processing instruction with 'xml' target, From richard@i... (Richard Tobin) on 14 Sep 2006 16:09:51 -0000
  • Re: processing instruction with 'xml' target, From David Carlisle <davidc@n...> on 14 Sep 2006 16:11:00 -0000
  • Re: processing instruction with 'xml' target, From <juanrgonzaleza@c...> on 14 Sep 2006 16:11:01 -0000
  • Followups by subject
  • Re: processing instruction with 'xml' target, From <juanrgonzaleza@c...> on 14 Sep 2006 16:30:04 -0000
  • Followups by message-id references
  • RE: processing instruction with 'xml' target, From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 14 Sep 2006 16:39:14 -0000
  • Followups by message-id references
  • RE: processing instruction with 'xml' target, From <juanrgonzaleza@c...> on 14 Sep 2006 18:13:33 -0000
  • RE: processing instruction with 'xml' target, From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 14 Sep 2006 23:08:05 -0000
  • RE: processing instruction with 'xml' target, From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@h...> on 14 Sep 2006 23:48:18 -0000
  • RE: processing instruction with 'xml' target, From <juanrgonzaleza@c...> on 15 Sep 2006 07:36:00 -0000
  • RE: processing instruction with 'xml' target, From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 15 Sep 2006 08:06:58 -0000
  • Re: processing instruction with 'xml' target, From Frank Richards <frank@t...> on 15 Sep 2006 08:45:01 -0000
  • Re: processing instruction with 'xml' target, From Ari Krupnik <ari@c...> on 15 Sep 2006 20:54:47 -0000
  • RE: processing instruction with 'xml' target, From <juanrgonzaleza@c...> on 16 Sep 2006 10:06:42 -0000
  • RE: processing instruction with 'xml' target, From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 16 Sep 2006 10:47:15 -0000
  • RE: processing instruction with 'xml' target, From Richard Salz <rsalz@u...> on 17 Sep 2006 04:14:26 -0000
  • RE: processing instruction with 'xml' target, From Tatu Saloranta <cowtowncoder@y...> on 15 Sep 2006 22:54:41 -0000
  • Re: processing instruction with 'xml' target, From <juanrgonzaleza@c...> on 14 Sep 2006 16:37:43 -0000
  • RE: processing instruction with 'xml' target, From "Nathan Young -X \(natyoung - Artizen at Cisco\)" <natyoung@c...> on 14 Sep 2006 23:54:18 -0000
  • Followups by message-id references
  • RE: processing instruction with 'xml' target, From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@h...> on 15 Sep 2006 09:48:22 -0000
  • Re: processing instruction with 'xml' target, From Chris Burdess <d09@h...> on 16 Sep 2006 17:24:05 -0000
  • Followups by message-id references
  • Re: processing instruction with 'xml' target, From <juanrgonzaleza@c...> on 23 Sep 2006 13:13:54 -0000
  • Followups by message-id references
  • Re: processing instruction with 'xml' target, From Tatu Saloranta <cowtowncoder@y...> on 24 Sep 2006 01:39:40 -0000
  • Re: processing instruction with 'xml' target, From <juanrgonzaleza@c...> on 24 Sep 2006 10:01:26 -0000
  • Re: processing instruction with 'xml' target, From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...> on 24 Sep 2006 09:07:09 -0000
  • Re: processing instruction with 'xml' target, From <juanrgonzaleza@c...> on 24 Sep 2006 10:18:33 -0000
  • XML 2006 - 10 year evolution, From "Marion Elledge" <MElledge@i...> on 14 Sep 2006 14:43:27 -0000
  • [ANN] XTech WebDev London, 31 October 2006, From Edd Dumbill <edd@u...> on 15 Sep 2006 09:51:26 -0000
  • ANN: Free XQuery Tutorial: Using XQuery in Your Architecture, From Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...> on 15 Sep 2006 15:40:10 -0000
  • RE: Redefine and Import used together - is this valid?, From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 15 Sep 2006 16:38:33 -0000
  • Followups by message-id references
    Followups by subject
  • RE: Redefine and Import used together - is this valid?, From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 15 Sep 2006 17:56:08 -0000
  • Re: Redefine and Import used together - is this valid?, From ht@i... (Henry S. Thompson) on 19 Sep 2006 11:36:25 -0000
  • Followups by message-id references
  • Message not availableFollowups by message-id references
  • Re: Redefine and Import used together - is this valid?, From ht@i... (Henry S. Thompson) on 19 Sep 2006 16:19:19 -0000
  • Xlink Isn't Dead, From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@h...> on 22 Sep 2006 02:38:35 -0000
  • Followups by message-id references
  • RE: Xlink Isn't Dead, From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 22 Sep 2006 08:44:53 -0000
  • RE: Xlink Isn't Dead, From Ben Trafford <ben@p...> on 22 Sep 2006 09:01:23 -0000
  • RE: Xlink Isn't Dead, From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 22 Sep 2006 09:16:28 -0000
  • RE: Xlink Isn't Dead, From Ben Trafford <ben@p...> on 22 Sep 2006 09:28:31 -0000
  • RE: Xlink Isn't Dead, From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 22 Sep 2006 09:52:46 -0000
  • RE: Xlink Isn't Dead, From Ben Trafford <ben@p...> on 22 Sep 2006 09:56:18 -0000
  • RE: Xlink Isn't Dead, From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 22 Sep 2006 11:11:15 -0000
  • RE: Xlink Isn't Dead, From Ben Trafford <ben@p...> on 22 Sep 2006 11:18:04 -0000
  • RE: Xlink Isn't Dead, From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@h...> on 22 Sep 2006 16:36:31 -0000
  • Re: Xlink Isn't Dead, From James Fuller <jim.fuller@r...> on 22 Sep 2006 11:17:21 -0000
  • RE: Xlink Isn't Dead, From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@h...> on 22 Sep 2006 16:37:23 -0000
  • Re: Xlink Isn't Dead, From Frans Englich <frans.englich@t...> on 22 Sep 2006 11:41:34 -0000
  • Re: Xlink Isn't Dead, From Philippe Poulard <Philippe.Poulard@s...> on 22 Sep 2006 12:47:49 -0000
  • Re: Xlink Isn't Dead, From "Peter Hunsberger" <peter.hunsberger@g...> on 22 Sep 2006 13:57:46 -0000
  • Re: Xlink Isn't Dead, From "Alexander Johannesen" <alexander.johannesen@g...> on 22 Sep 2006 11:33:56 -0000
  • Re: Xlink Isn't Dead, From Ben Trafford <ben@p...> on 22 Sep 2006 11:37:16 -0000
  • Re: Xlink Isn't Dead, From Ari Krupnik <ari@c...> on 22 Sep 2006 15:52:01 -0000
  • Re: Xlink Isn't Dead, From Elliotte Harold <elharo@m...> on 22 Sep 2006 16:33:12 -0000
  • Re: Xlink Isn't Dead, From Richard Salz <rsalz@u...> on 22 Sep 2006 17:45:21 -0000
  • RE: Xlink Isn't Dead, From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@h...> on 22 Sep 2006 16:49:35 -0000
  • RE: Xlink Isn't Dead, From Ben Trafford <ben@p...> on 22 Sep 2006 16:51:15 -0000
  • RE: Xlink Isn't Dead, From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@h...> on 22 Sep 2006 16:59:17 -0000
  • RE: Xlink Isn't Dead, From Ben Trafford <ben@p...> on 22 Sep 2006 17:03:46 -0000
  • Re: Xlink Isn't Dead, From "Peter Hunsberger" <peter.hunsberger@g...> on 22 Sep 2006 17:38:23 -0000
  • RE: Xlink Isn't Dead, From Tatu Saloranta <cowtowncoder@y...> on 22 Sep 2006 17:58:06 -0000
  • RE: Xlink Isn't Dead, From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@h...> on 22 Sep 2006 21:06:27 -0000
  • Re: Xlink Isn't Dead, From "Bob DuCharme" <bob@s...> on 22 Sep 2006 17:42:44 -0000
  • Re: Xlink Isn't Dead, From Norman Walsh <ndw@n...> on 22 Sep 2006 18:09:23 -0000
  • RE: Xlink Isn't Dead, From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@h...> on 22 Sep 2006 16:46:26 -0000
  • ANN: Amara XML Toolkit 1.1.9, From Uche Ogbuji <uche@o...> on 16 Sep 2006 03:59:14 -0000
  • Followups by message-id references
    Followups by subject
  • Re: ANN: Amara XML Toolkit 1.1.9, From Uche Ogbuji <uche@o...> on 19 Sep 2006 17:45:59 -0000
  • Re: Suggestion test - WAS: Patents on XML software, fileformats, schemas, vocabularies, From sterling <sstouden@t...> on 18 Sep 2006 04:03:50 -0000
  • Followups by message-id references
  • Re: Suggestion test - WAS: Patents on XML software, file formats, schemas, vocabularies, From Tatu Saloranta <cowtowncoder@y...> on 18 Sep 2006 06:03:31 -0000
  • Find all Namespace Declarations, From "K. W. Landry" <kwlandry@g...> on 18 Sep 2006 20:24:11 -0000
  • Followups by message-id references
  • Re: Find all Namespace Declarations, From Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@g...> on 18 Sep 2006 20:29:49 -0000
  • [ANN] xnsdoc 1.2 - XML Schema documentation generator, From forge@b... on 19 Sep 2006 00:02:22 -0000
  • PLAN-X 2007: Call for Papers and Demos (Deadline Extended), From Torsten Grust <grust@i...> on 20 Sep 2006 08:33:28 -0000
  • seting up xml bank, From "=?UTF-8?B?VG9tYXogS2xhbsSNbmlr?=" <slimt@e...> on 20 Sep 2006 18:59:15 -0000
  • Followups by message-id references
  • Re: setting up xml bank, From peter murray-rust <pm286@c...> on 21 Sep 2006 08:05:38 -0000
  • XPointer: which namespace bindings in the result?, From Florent Georges <darkman_spam@y...> on 22 Sep 2006 13:38:36 -0000
  • Followups by message-id references
  • RE: XPointer: which namespace bindings in the result?, From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 22 Sep 2006 13:55:37 -0000
  • Followups by message-id references
  • Re: XPointer: which namespace bindings in the result?, From Florent Georges <darkman_spam@y...> on 22 Sep 2006 14:03:36 -0000
  • UBL Code List Value Validation Methodology version 0.7 Draft 1, From "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@C...> on 22 Sep 2006 15:01:19 -0000
  • RE: Xlink Isn't Dead, From "Nathan Young -X \(natyoung - Artizen at Cisco\)" <natyoung@c...> on 22 Sep 2006 18:09:15 -0000
  • Followups by message-id references
  • RE: Xlink Isn't Dead, From Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...> on 22 Sep 2006 18:58:33 -0000
  • Followups by message-id references
  • Re: Xlink Isn't Dead, From Jirka Kosek <jirka@k...> on 23 Sep 2006 08:55:24 -0000
  • Followups by message-id references
  • RE: Xlink Isn't Dead, From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@h...> on 23 Sep 2006 17:19:32 -0000
  • RE: Xlink Isn't Dead, From Ben Trafford <ben@p...> on 23 Sep 2006 19:55:54 -0000
  • Re: Xlink Isn't Dead, From Dave Pawson <davep@d...> on 24 Sep 2006 17:41:34 -0000
  • Re: Xlink Isn't Dead, From Ben Trafford <ben@p...> on 24 Sep 2006 17:44:24 -0000
  • Re: Xlink Isn't Dead, From peter murray-rust <pm286@c...> on 24 Sep 2006 18:11:56 -0000
  • Re: Xlink Isn't Dead, From Ben Trafford <ben@p...> on 24 Sep 2006 22:03:03 -0000
  • Re: Xlink Isn't Dead, From Ari Krupnik <ari@c...> on 24 Sep 2006 23:13:46 -0000
  • XLink the SAX way... (was: XLink isn't dead), From Tatu Saloranta <cowtowncoder@y...> on 24 Sep 2006 23:46:00 -0000
  • Re: XLink the SAX way... (was: XLink isn't dead), From Ben Trafford <ben@p...> on 25 Sep 2006 03:10:01 -0000
  • Re: Xlink Isn't Dead, From peter murray-rust <pm286@c...> on 25 Sep 2006 15:31:11 -0000
  • Re: Xlink Isn't Dead, From Ben Trafford <ben@p...> on 25 Sep 2006 15:34:03 -0000
  • Re: Xlink Isn't Dead, From peter murray-rust <pm286@c...> on 25 Sep 2006 16:02:59 -0000
  • RE: Xlink Isn't Dead, From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@h...> on 24 Sep 2006 23:48:31 -0000
  • RE: Xlink Isn't Dead, From Ben Trafford <ben@p...> on 25 Sep 2006 03:12:21 -0000
  • RE: Xlink Isn't Dead, From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 25 Sep 2006 07:04:02 -0000
  • RE: Xlink Isn't Dead, From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@h...> on 25 Sep 2006 10:04:44 -0000
  • RE: Xlink Isn't Dead, From Ben Trafford <ben@p...> on 25 Sep 2006 15:20:36 -0000
  • Re: Xlink Isn't Dead, From James Fuller <jim.fuller@r...> on 25 Sep 2006 15:51:22 -0000
  • Re: Xlink Isn't Dead, From Ben Trafford <ben@p...> on 25 Sep 2006 15:55:30 -0000
  • Re: Xlink Isn't Dead, From James Fuller <jim.fuller@r...> on 25 Sep 2006 16:11:24 -0000
  • Re: Xlink Isn't Dead, From Dave Pawson <davep@d...> on 25 Sep 2006 17:01:36 -0000
  • Re: Xlink Isn't Dead, From "Peter Hunsberger" <peter.hunsberger@g...> on 22 Sep 2006 19:19:39 -0000
  • RE: Xlink Isn't Dead, From "Bob DuCharme" <bob@s...> on 22 Sep 2006 21:51:31 -0000
  • Followups by message-id references
  • RE: Xlink Isn't Dead, From Ben Trafford <ben@p...> on 22 Sep 2006 22:22:43 -0000
  • Followups by message-id references
  • Re: Xlink Isn't Dead, From "Alexander Johannesen" <alexander.johannesen@g...> on 22 Sep 2006 23:17:08 -0000
  • Re: Xlink Isn't Dead, From Ben Trafford <ben@p...> on 23 Sep 2006 00:01:52 -0000
  • Re: Xlink Isn't Dead, From "Alexander Johannesen" <alexander.johannesen@g...> on 23 Sep 2006 00:17:13 -0000
  • Re: Xlink Isn't Dead, From Ben Trafford <ben@p...> on 23 Sep 2006 00:29:12 -0000
  • Re: Xlink Isn't Dead, From "Alexander Johannesen" <alexander.johannesen@g...> on 23 Sep 2006 13:22:20 -0000
  • Re: Xlink Isn't Dead, From Ben Trafford <ben@p...> on 23 Sep 2006 14:18:07 -0000
  • Re: Xlink Isn't Dead, From "Alexander Johannesen" <alexander.johannesen@g...> on 24 Sep 2006 00:46:43 -0000
  • Re: Xlink Isn't Dead, From "Ben Trafford" <ben@p...> on 24 Sep 2006 04:45:56 -0000
  • RE: Xlink Isn't Dead, From "Bob DuCharme" <bob@s...> on 23 Sep 2006 01:47:45 -0000
  • RE: Xlink Isn't Dead, From Ben Trafford <ben@p...> on 23 Sep 2006 02:16:53 -0000
  • RE: Xlink Isn't Dead, From "Bob DuCharme" <bob@s...> on 23 Sep 2006 04:50:45 -0000
  • RE: Xlink Isn't Dead, From "Bob DuCharme" <bob@s...> on 23 Sep 2006 05:04:41 -0000
  • RE: Xlink Isn't Dead, From Ben Trafford <ben@p...> on 23 Sep 2006 05:21:59 -0000
  • RE: Xlink Isn't Dead, From Ben Trafford <ben@p...> on 23 Sep 2006 02:18:01 -0000
  • RE: Xlink Isn't Dead, From peter murray-rust <pm286@c...> on 23 Sep 2006 05:51:18 -0000
  • RE: Xlink Isn't Dead, From Ben Trafford <ben@p...> on 23 Sep 2006 06:02:05 -0000
  • RE: Xlink Isn't Dead, From peter murray-rust <pm286@c...> on 23 Sep 2006 07:59:39 -0000
  • Re: Xlink Isn't Dead, From "Alexander Johannesen" <alexander.johannesen@g...> on 22 Sep 2006 23:23:16 -0000
  • Followups by message-id references
  • Re: Xlink Isn't Dead, From Ben Trafford <ben@p...> on 23 Sep 2006 00:04:41 -0000
  • Followups by subject
  • RE: Xlink Isn't Dead, From "Nathan Young -X \(natyoung - Artizen at Cisco\)" <natyoung@c...> on 23 Sep 2006 00:50:57 -0000
  • Re: Xlink Isn't Dead, From Robert Koberg <rob@k...> on 26 Sep 2006 22:53:12 -0000
  • Xlink Isn't Dead, From "Campbell, Richard S." <RCampbell@F...> on 22 Sep 2006 19:27:30 -0000
  • Status of link doc and vacation messages., From Ben Trafford <ben@p...> on 25 Sep 2006 03:16:43 -0000
  • Followups by message-id references
  • Experience with Spreadsheet-WriteExcel-FromXML-1.1.., From david.lyon@p... on 25 Sep 2006 04:33:01 -0000
  • Followups by message-id references
  • Re: Experience with Spreadsheet-WriteExcel-FromXML-1.1.., From Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...> on 25 Sep 2006 11:22:20 -0000
  • Followups by message-id references
  • Re: Experience with Spreadsheet-WriteExcel-FromXML-1.1.., From "David Lyon" <david.lyon@p...> on 25 Sep 2006 13:41:47 -0000
  • Re: Experience with Spreadsheet-WriteExcel-FromXML-1.1.., From Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...> on 25 Sep 2006 14:12:51 -0000
  • Re: Experience with Spreadsheet-WriteExcel-FromXML-1.1.., From "David Lyon" <david.lyon@p...> on 25 Sep 2006 14:47:17 -0000
  • Re: Experience with Spreadsheet-WriteExcel-FromXML-1.1.., From Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...> on 25 Sep 2006 15:24:59 -0000
  • Re: Experience with Spreadsheet-WriteExcel-FromXML-1.1.., From ht@m... (Henry S. Thompson) on 26 Sep 2006 09:37:49 -0000
  • Re: Experience with Spreadsheet-WriteExcel-FromXML-1.1.., From Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...> on 26 Sep 2006 09:53:24 -0000
  • Re: Experience with Spreadsheet-WriteExcel-FromXML-1.1.., From "David Lyon" <david.lyon@p...> on 26 Sep 2006 11:29:16 -0000
  • Re: Experience with Spreadsheet-WriteExcel-FromXML-1.1.., From Rick Marshall <rjm@z...> on 25 Sep 2006 23:12:46 -0000
  • Followups by message-id references
  • Re: Experience with Spreadsheet-WriteExcel-FromXML-1.1.., From "David Lyon" <david.lyon@p...> on 26 Sep 2006 01:06:30 -0000
  • RE: Xlink Isn't Dead, From <Nicholas.Ardlie@g...> on 25 Sep 2006 04:44:12 -0000
  • Followups by message-id references
  • RE: Xlink Isn't Dead, From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@h...> on 25 Sep 2006 09:57:50 -0000
  • Followups by message-id references
  • RE: Xlink Isn't Dead, From sterling <sstouden@t...> on 25 Sep 2006 16:43:07 -0000
  • Followups by subject
  • RE: Xlink Isn't Dead, From <Nicholas.Ardlie@g...> on 26 Sep 2006 00:09:10 -0000
  • Followups by message-id references
  • RE: Xlink Isn't Dead, From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@h...> on 26 Sep 2006 09:38:08 -0000
  • Followups by message-id references
  • Re: Xlink Isn't Dead, From "Peter Hunsberger" <peter.hunsberger@g...> on 26 Sep 2006 13:39:46 -0000
  • Re: Xlink Isn't Dead, From Robert Koberg <rob@k...> on 26 Sep 2006 13:57:19 -0000
  • Re: Xlink Isn't Dead, From "Peter Hunsberger" <peter.hunsberger@g...> on 26 Sep 2006 14:39:46 -0000
  • RE: Xlink Isn't Dead, From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@h...> on 26 Sep 2006 15:11:36 -0000
  • Re: Xlink Isn't Dead, From Ari Krupnik <ari@c...> on 26 Sep 2006 18:34:37 -0000
  • Followups by message-id references
  • Re: Xlink Isn't Dead, From Richard Salz <rsalz@u...> on 26 Sep 2006 19:00:50 -0000
  • RE: Xlink Isn't Dead, From "Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@b...> on 26 Sep 2006 19:36:09 -0000
  • RelaxNG validators?, From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...> on 25 Sep 2006 20:58:34 -0000
  • Followups by message-id references
  • Re: RelaxNG validators?, From Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@g...> on 25 Sep 2006 21:09:26 -0000
  • Reading binary formatted data, From Vincent Forbes <vwfst55@g...> on 26 Sep 2006 00:32:28 -0000
  • Followups by message-id references
  • Re: Reading binary formatted data, From "David Lyon" <david.lyon@p...> on 26 Sep 2006 01:04:28 -0000
  • [ANN] CodeSynthesis XSD 2.3.0 - Open-source XML Schema to C++ compiler, From Boris Kolpackov <boris@c...> on 26 Sep 2006 08:50:12 -0000
  • [Announce] Stylus Studio 2007 XML Enterprise Suite Released: XML Pipeline, XML Publishing and Data Conversion API's, From "Stylus Studio" <stylusstudio@g...> on 26 Sep 2006 16:00:20 -0000
  • Transforming the whole soap response, From "andrew welch" <andrew.j.welch@g...> on 26 Sep 2006 16:27:27 -0000
  • Followups by message-id references
  • Re: Transforming the whole soap response, From Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...> on 26 Sep 2006 16:30:12 -0000
  • Followups by message-id references
  • Re: Transforming the whole soap response, From "andrew welch" <andrew.j.welch@g...> on 26 Sep 2006 16:41:49 -0000
  • convert dom4j.Document to net.sf.saxon.om.NodeInfo, From Brian Caruso <bdc34@c...> on 26 Sep 2006 20:40:30 -0000
  • Followups by message-id references
  • Re: convert dom4j.Document to net.sf.saxon.om.NodeInfo, From "Justin Edelson" <justinedelson@g...> on 26 Sep 2006 21:24:32 -0000
  • RE: convert dom4j.Document to net.sf.saxon.om.NodeInfo, From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 26 Sep 2006 22:47:27 -0000
  • Followups by message-id references
  • Re: convert dom4j.Document to net.sf.saxon.om.NodeInfo, From "David Lyon" <david.lyon@p...> on 26 Sep 2006 23:50:14 -0000
  • Followups by message-id references
  • RE: convert dom4j.Document to net.sf.saxon.om.NodeInfo, From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 27 Sep 2006 06:53:47 -0000
  • RE: convert dom4j.Document to net.sf.saxon.om.NodeInfo, From Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...> on 27 Sep 2006 07:28:25 -0000
  • XML-DEV list: was [RE: convert dom4j.Document to net.sf.saxon.om.NodeInfo], From peter murray-rust <pm286@c...> on 27 Sep 2006 07:44:11 -0000
  • PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

    Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

    Buy Stylus Studio Now

    Download The World's Best XML IDE!

    Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

    Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
    Email
    First Name
    Last Name
    Company
    Subscribe in XML format
    RSS 2.0
    Atom 0.3
     

    Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats, enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.


    Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website. they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please click here.

    Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
    Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
    W3C Member
    Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.