[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Xlink Isn't Dead
Ben Trafford wrote: > > At 11:51 AM 9/25/2006, James Fuller wrote: > >> dont know if RDDL has some part to play here? > > > The essential problem I have with RDDL is the requirement that > roles be stated as URIs. I mean, that's fine if you're only trying to > use it to define namespaces (its intended purpose), but not so good for > things like CML, for example. agreed, the reason why I mentioned it was that I toyed around with building a simplistic facade over XLINK, using RDDL a few years ago...though I am afraid there is too much DPH(desperate perl hacker)-ness to the approach. I am afraid that I would drown in 'flame' proposing it here....for starters.....I added an xml:href attribute (yes adding attributes to xml reserved namespace is a very silly thing to do) which was easy and simple to use. gl, Jim Fuller
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|