[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: best xml parser to use
--- Stefan Tilkov <info@t...> wrote: > On Sep 6, 2006, at 10:08 PM, K. W. Landry wrote: > ... > In terms of performance, I would expect StAX and SAX > to be roughly > equal. Something hardcoded that is not XML-aware > will be a lot > faster, but much more error-prone. Latter yes, former not necessarily. What I found out was that reading a stream using JDK BufferedReader(), reading line by line, was slightly slower than parsing content as XML. Your mileage may vary, but regular stream parsing is surprisingly fast nowadays (30 - 40 MBps on typical desktop machines), -+ Tatu +- __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|