[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: processing instruction with 'xml' target

• From: "Len Bullard" <cbullard@h...>
• To: "'Nathan Young -X \(natyoung - Artizen at Cisco\)'" <natyoung@c...>, <xml-dev@l...>
• Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 04:48:32 -0500

Isn't what they link to what they have to say? For twelve years, that's what
I read here and on the old comp.text.sgml.  No links = no content.  So it's
links and who and once there are enough links to a who they become the
expert and Googlefied experts are never wrong because that would mean the
whole inbound link counting metric has a flaw with regards to authoritative
search returns.  Wow!  You mean Google results are somehow not to be
trusted???  You mean the Long Tail is a hoax??? CRIKEY!!

Heck, if I have to explain the joke, it's not funny.

len


From: Nathan Young -X (natyoung - Artizen at Cisco)
[mailto:natyoung@c...] 
 
It's not quite the same...

because it's not what people say that matters... it's what they link to.

• References:
  • RE: processing instruction with 'xml' target
    • From: "Nathan Young -X \(natyoung - Artizen at Cisco\)" <natyoung@c...>