[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Xlink Isn't Dead
At 18:44 24/09/2006, Ben Trafford wrote: >At 01:15 PM 9/24/2006, Dave Pawson wrote: >>I guess all that is missing is a David Megginson to take the lead >>and put forward the (a?) proposal. >>Bob, Jirka, Ben, someone else? > > I'm working on a proposal for the list's review as we > speak. It should be out before midnight EST (that's the witching > hour, here in Soviet Canuckistan). This is excellent. I think we have identified the issues. If something emerges which can replace what I have done in CML I will be happy and junk the <map> and <link> elements I have developed. In my case they are purely semantic (i.e. it is unlikely they will ever be renderable directly). I may be old-fashioned but I would prefer an XML spec for links to RDF. That is not to say I don't use RDF but it is rather too flexible for me. I would like a link which can be strongly typed. For those who don't remember what we did with SAX it's worth revisiting the archives. Essentially DavidM ran it with a weekly series of questions and members mailed him directly. Then each week he digested these and came out with a revised vision *and* running prototype code. The latter is VERY important. I think the issues have been aired enough to make a good concise start. It is important to limit the discursion - this list is now rather noisy, and to set timelines. Of course they can be revised. But we are much wiser now about what we want. P. Peter Murray-Rust Unilever Centre for Molecular Sciences Informatics University of Cambridge, Lensfield Road, Cambridge CB2 1EW, UK +44-1223-763069
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|