[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: SGML complexity
SGML:definition 2.1.1 expression 1-ambiguous if its markings E' denotes no two words uxv and uyw where x not = y and x (unmarked) = y (unmarked), how does that fit into xml? Does this definition fit into xml. On Mon, 11 Sep 2006, Tei wrote: > I think is usefull to describe XML, XSLT and SGML as standard protocols. > Because the social implications of a standard protocol is working onthis mail list. > There are people that query "You can do [xyz] with [protocol]", thensome guy A answer "Yes". And then some guy B answer "Maybe, but use[propietary extension, new lenguaje, etc] instead".After that, a war betwen A and B tryiing to [win]. > Thats threads are long, usefull, and because all people post in thecorrect thread, is easy to ignore by people not interested. Yetanother reason to read this beatifull mail list. > I want to highlight two facts: - A is [smart, or maybe a genius]. He can do [xyz] with [protocol]and maybe is a good idea, but most normal people are unallowed tofigure out how to convulate [protocol] to make [xyz], mostly becauseat first [xyz] seems imposible. - Fighting against standar protocols are like fighting the tide withsand castles. Is naïve, fun and doomed. > Of course, half my facts say "Apply [XYZ]" and half facts say "Avoid[XYZ]". And this why people discuss, because both sides have goodpoints. >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|