XML-DEV Mailing List Archive by date - February, 1999

• XML and special Characters : unicode v3.0 ? - From: "Baden Hughes" <bmhughes@o...>
• RE: W3C spec.dtd - From: Jarle Stabell <jarle.stabell@d...>
• W3C-transformation language petition - From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• Re: Streaming XML and SAX - From: "Bill la Forge" <b.laforge@j...>
• XLINK role attribute for simple links? - From: MikeDacon@a...
• W3C spec.dtd - From: Stefan Mintert <mintert@i...>
• RE: Streaming XML and SAX - From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@n...>
• Re: Streaming XML and SAX - From: Tom Harding <tomh@t...>
• Re: Streaming XML and SAX - From: Nathan Kurz <nate@v...>
• Re: Streaming XML and SAX - From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• Re: Streaming XML and SAX - From: Tom Harding <tomh@t...>
• Re: Yet another niggling XML syntax question - From: Richard Goerwitz <richard@g...>
• Another Step Toward XML Content - From: Ralph Ferris <ralph@f...>
• Yet another niggling XML syntax question - From: roddey@u...
• RE: Streams, protocols, documents and fragments - From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@n...>
• RE: Streams, protocols, documents and fragments - From: <Michael.Orr@D...>
• Re: Are notations dead, or just pining for the fjords? (was Re: SAX and delayed entity loading) - From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>
• Comments on WD-html-in-xml-19990224 - From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>
• HyBrick Download Problem Fixed - From: Ralph Ferris <ralph@f...>
• Re: recursing root element - From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>
• RE: Well-formed vs. valid - From: roddey@u...
• Re: Content-Document-Type: was (Re: MIME types vs. DOCTYPE) - From: Walter Underwood <wunder@i...>
• RE: events vs callbacks (was Re: SAX2 (was Re: DOM vs. SAX??? Nah. )) - From: Ron Daniel <RDaniel@D...>
• Re: events vs callbacks (was Re: SAX2 (was Re: DOM vs. SAX??? Nah. )) - From: Ken MacLeod <ken@b...>
• Architecture docs for SAX - From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• Re: Streams, protocols, documents and fragments - From: Tom Harding <tomh@t...>
• Re: XML with CSS in IE5 - From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan@t...>
• Re: recursing root element - From: "James Tauber" <jtauber@j...>
• RE: Content-Document-Type: was (Re: MIME types vs. DOCTYPE) - From: "Jonathan Borden" <jborden@m...>
• RE: recursing root element - From: Ronald Bourret <rbourret@i...>
• Re: XML with CSS in IE5 - From: "John E. Simpson" <simpson@p...>
• Re: events vs callbacks - From: "Bill la Forge" <b.laforge@j...>
• Re: Content-Document-Type: was (Re: MIME types vs. DOCTYPE) - From: MURATA Makoto <murata@a...>
• Re: XML with CSS in IE5 - From: Chris Maden <crism@o...>
• Re: XML with CSS in IE5 - From: "Frank Boumphrey" <bckman@i...>
• recursing root element - From: "Frank Boumphrey" <bckman@i...>
• Re: XML with CSS in IE5 - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Re: Streams, protocols, documents and fragments - From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• Re: events vs callbacks (was Re: SAX2 (was Re: DOM vs. SAX??? Nah. )) - From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• XML with CSS in IE5 - From: "Chung, Byung Hee" <chtino@h...>
• Re: Well-formed vs. valid - From: David Brownell <db@E...>
• Re: events vs callbacks (was Re: SAX2 (was Re: DOM vs. SAX??? Nah. )) - From: Gabe Beged-Dov <begeddov@j...>
• RE: Streaming XML (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999) - From: "Jonathan Borden" <jborden@m...>
• Content-Document-Type: was (Re: MIME types vs. DOCTYPE) - From: "Jonathan Borden" <jborden@m...>
• ANNOUNCE: "HyBrick" Browser, V0.82 - From: Ralph Ferris <ralph@f...>
• Re: Proposal to standardise a Java API - From: "John Wilson" <tug@w...>
• Re: Proposal to standardise a Java API - From: David Brownell <db@E...>
• Architecture docs for SAX - From: "Merriam, Rudyard" <Rudyard.Merriam@C...>
• RE: Well-formed vs. valid - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Layered Model for XML - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Proposal to standardise a Java API - From: "John Wilson" <tug@w...>
• ANNOUNCE: RDF DTD available - From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
• Re: Streams, protocols, documents and fragments - From: Tom Harding <tomh@t...>
• RE: Well-formed vs. valid - From: roddey@u...
• Re: events vs callbacks (was Re: SAX2 (was Re: DOM vs. SAX??? Nah. )) - From: "Bill la Forge" <b.laforge@j...>
• Re: events vs callbacks (was Re: SAX2 (was Re: DOM vs. SAX??? Nah. )) - From: Paul Rabin <rabin@s...>
• MIME and X(HT)ML (Re: MIME types vs. DOCTYPE) - From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
• Re: events vs callbacks (was Re: SAX2 (was Re: DOM vs. SAX??? Nah. )) - From: Gabe Beged-Dov <begeddov@j...>
• Re: events vs callbacks (was Re: SAX2 (was Re: DOM vs. SAX??? Nah. )) - From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• RE: Streaming XML (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999) - From: keshlam@u...
• RE: Streams, protocols, documents and fragments - From: keshlam@u...
• RE: MIME types vs. DOCTYPE (was RE: ANNOUNCE: New XHTML WD) - From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• RE: Streams, protocols, documents and fragments - From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• Re: Streams, protocols, documents and fragments - From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• RE: having to deal with mal-formed XML - From: "Matthew Sergeant (EML)" <Matthew.Sergeant@e...>
• Re: having to deal with mal-formed XML - From: "Eric Prud'hommeaux" <eric@w...>
• Re: Streaming XML (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999) - From: Marcelo Cantos <marcelo@m...>
• Re: ANNOUNCE: New XHTML WD - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• RE: MIME types vs. DOCTYPE (was RE: ANNOUNCE: New XHTML WD) - From: "Jeffrey E. Sussna" <jes@k...>
• RE: Streams, protocols, documents and fragments - From: <Marc.McDonald@D...>
• RE: MIME types vs. DOCTYPE (was RE: ANNOUNCE: New XHTML WD) - From: "Jonathan Borden" <jborden@m...>
• Re: MIME types vs. DOCTYPE (was RE: ANNOUNCE: New XHTML WD) - From: "Bill la Forge" <b.laforge@j...>
• Re: MIME types vs. DOCTYPE (was RE: ANNOUNCE: New XHTML WD) - From: Ken MacLeod <ken@b...>
• Re: Streams, protocols, documents and fragments - From: Ken MacLeod <ken@b...>
• RE UML vs groves (Was Streaming XML) - From: Terry Allen <tallen@s...>
• Re: Streaming XML (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999) - From: "Steven R. Newcomb" <srn@t...>
• Re: Streams, protocols, documents and fragments - From: Thomas Geer <tgeer@s...>
• RE: Streams, protocols, documents and fragments - From: Mark Birbeck <Mark.Birbeck@i...>
• Re: Streams, protocols, documents and fragments - From: Tom Harding <tomh@t...>
• Re: Question about New XHTML WD - From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>
• Re: Streaming XML and SAX - From: Walter Underwood <wunder@i...>
• Re: ANNOUNCE: New XHTML WD - From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• Re: Streams, protocols, documents and fragments - From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• RE: Streams, protocols, documents and fragments was: RE: Documents and Document Fragments (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999) - From: Mark Birbeck <Mark.Birbeck@i...>
• Re: Streaming XML and SAX - From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• Re: ANNOUNCE: New XHTML WD - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Re: ANNOUNCE: New XHTML WD - From: Clark Evans <clark.evans@m...>
• Re: Streams, protocols, documents and fragments - From: Tom Harding <tomh@t...>
• Re: Multiple namespaces for HTML... why? - From: james anderson <James.Anderson@m...>
• Re: Streaming XML and SAX - From: Tom Harding <tomh@t...>
• Re: having to deal with mal-formed XML - From: Jonathan Eisenzopf <eisen@p...>
• Re: Documents and Document Fragments - From: Paul Grosso <pgrosso@a...>
• Re: MIME types vs. DOCTYPE (was RE: ANNOUNCE: New XHTML WD) - From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Multiple namespaces for HTML... why? - From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• RE: Documents and Document Fragments - From: Mark Birbeck <Mark.Birbeck@i...>
• Question about New XHTML WD - From: "Jeff Greif" <jmg@t...>
• MIME types vs. DOCTYPE (was RE: ANNOUNCE: New XHTML WD) - From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• Re: ANNOUNCE: New XHTML WD - From: "Frank Boumphrey" <bckman@i...>
• Re: Documents and Document Fragments - From: Lauren Wood <lauren@s...>
• FW: ANNOUNCE: New XHTML WD - From: Daniel Austin <daniela@c...>
• RE: More XML Identity Angst - From: Andrew Layman <andrewl@m...>
• RE: ANNOUNCE: New XHTML WD - From: "Jonathan Borden" <jborden@m...>
• ANNOUNCE: New XHTML WD - From: "Frank Boumphrey" <bckman@i...>
• Re: Streams, protocols, documents and fragments - From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>
• Re: "Empty" Text Nodes - From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>
• RE: Streams, protocols, documents and fragments - From: Mark Birbeck <Mark.Birbeck@i...>
• RE: Streams, protocols, documents and fragments - From: "Matthew Sergeant (EML)" <Matthew.Sergeant@e...>
• RE: Streaming XML (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999) - From: "Borden, Jonathan" <jborden@m...>
• RE: Documents and Document Fragments - From: Tim.Shaw@w...
• RE: ANNOUNCE: XML Conformance Public Information Page - From: "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@C...>
• RE: Streams, protocols, documents and fragments - From: Tim.Shaw@w...
• RE: Streams, protocols, documents and fragments - From: "Borden, Jonathan" <jborden@m...>
• Re: Streaming XML (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999) - From: "Steven R. Newcomb" <srn@t...>
• RE: Documents and Document Fragments - From: Mark Birbeck <Mark.Birbeck@i...>
• RE: Streams, protocols, documents and fragments - From: Mark Birbeck <Mark.Birbeck@i...>
• re: Streaming XML and SAX - From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• RE: Streaming XML (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999) - From: "Borden, Jonathan" <jborden@m...>
• Streaming XML and SAX - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• RE: Streams, protocols, documents and fragments - From: "Borden, Jonathan" <jborden@m...>
• RE: Well-formed vs. valid - From: <Marc.McDonald@D...>
• RE: FW: XML Mail - From: "Borden, Jonathan" <jborden@m...>
• Re: Streaming XML (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999) - From: len bullard <cbullard@h...>
• Re: Streaming XML (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999) - From: len bullard <cbullard@h...>
• Re: Streaming XML (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999) - From: len bullard <cbullard@h...>
• Re: events vs callbacks (was Re: SAX2 (was Re: DOM vs. SAX??? Nah. )) - From: "Bill la Forge" <b.laforge@j...>
• re: Streams, protocols, documents and fragments - From: Nathan Kurz <nate@v...>
• RE: Documents and Document Fragments - From: Nathan Kurz <nate@v...>
• Re: Streaming XML (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999) - From: Lauren Wood <lauren@s...>
• RE: ANNOUNCE: XML Conformance Public Information Page - From: Ralph Ferris <ralph@f...>
• Re: Streaming XML (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999) - From: "Steven R. Newcomb" <srn@t...>
• Re: Streaming XML (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999) - From: Marcus Carr <mrc@a...>
• Re: FW: XML Mail - From: Clark Evans <clark.evans@m...>
• RE: ANNOUNCE: XML Conformance Public Information Page - From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@n...>
• Re: ModSAX (SAX 1.1) Proposal - From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• RE: Streaming XML (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999) - From: Mark Birbeck <Mark.Birbeck@i...>
• Re: Streaming XML - From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
• Fw: Streaming XML - From: "Oren Ben-Kiki" <oren@c...>
• RE: Streaming XML - From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• RE: Streaming XML (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999) - From: "Eisele, Fred" <fred.eisele@e...>
• RE: Streaming XML (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999) - From: Mark Birbeck <Mark.Birbeck@i...>
• FYI: MS to ship IE5 on March 18th... - From: "Scot Wingo (nTronix)" <scot@n...>
• RE: Streaming XML - From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• ANNOUNCE: XML Conformance Public Information Page - From: "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@C...>
• Re: XML implementation in MS-Word - From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• RE: Streaming XML (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999) - From: "Hutchison, Nigel" <nwoh@s...>
• Re: XTech '99 starts in two weeks - From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• RE: Streaming XML (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999) - From: "Matthew Sergeant (EML)" <Matthew.Sergeant@e...>
• XML AND Semiconductor industry? - From: Eric Huang <hfhuang@i...>
• XML implementation in MS-Word - From: "Chung, Byung Hee" <chtino@h...>
• Re: ModSAX (SAX 1.1) Proposal - From: "Don Park" <donpark@q...>
• Re: Streaming XML (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999) - From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• Re: ModSAX (SAX 1.1) Proposal - From: James Clark <jjc@j...>
• RE: Streaming XML (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999) - From: "Borden, Jonathan" <jborden@m...>
• RE: Streams, protocols, documents and fragments was: RE: Documents and Document Fragments (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999) - From: "Borden, Jonathan" <jborden@m...>
• Re: events vs callbacks (was Re: SAX2 (was Re: DOM vs. SAX??? Nah. )) - From: Gabe Beged-Dov <begeddov@j...>
• Re: More XML Identity Angst - From: "James Tauber" <jtauber@j...>
• Re: Streams, protocols, documents and fragments was: RE: Documents and Document Fragments (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999) - From: "James Tauber" <jtauber@j...>
• localised declarations (Re: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999) - From: "James Tauber" <jtauber@j...>
• Re: Streams, protocols, documents and fragments was: RE: Documents and Document Fragments (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999) - From: "James Tauber" <jtauber@j...>
• Re: Streaming XML (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999) - From: len bullard <cbullard@h...>
• RE: Streaming XML? [was Re: XML Information Set Requirements..] - From: "Paul Butkiewicz" <arabbit@e...>
• RE: Documents and Document Fragments (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999) - From: Mark Birbeck <Mark.Birbeck@i...>
• Re: SAX and Standards Bodies (was Streaming XML?) - From: Rob Schoening <rschoening@u...>
• Re: events vs callbacks (was Re: SAX2 (was Re: DOM vs. SAX??? Nah. )) - From: "Bill la Forge" <b.laforge@j...>
• Re: SAX and Standards Bodies (was Streaming XML?) - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• RE: Validation Conditions (was Streaming XML (was ...)) - From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• Announce: DTDGenerator frontend. - From: "Paul at Sunnyvale" <paul@q...>
• RE: Well-formed vs. valid - From: "Jeffrey E. Sussna" <jes@k...>
• events vs callbacks (was Re: SAX2 (was Re: DOM vs. SAX??? Nah. )) - From: Gabe Beged-Dov <begeddov@j...>
• Re: Well-formed vs. valid - From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• RE: Streaming XML (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999) - From: Mark Birbeck <Mark.Birbeck@i...>
• Re: Latin (was Re: Announcement: XML Infoset Requirements Published) - From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>
• Re: Streaming XML (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999) - From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>
• Re: Streaming XML (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999) - From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• Well-formed vs. valid - From: "Jeffrey E. Sussna" <jes@k...>
• RE: Validation Conditions (was Streaming XML (was ...)) - From: Michael.Kay@i...
• Re: layering specs - From: Walter Underwood <wunder@i...>
• Re: Confusion about conditional sections - From: roddey@u...
• Re: layering specs - From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
• Re: Streaming XML (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999) - From: Richard Tobin <richard@c...>
• SAX and Standards Bodies (was Streaming XML?) - From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• Submitting comments on the XML Infoset Requirements - From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• More XML Identity Angst - From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• Re: Streaming XML (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999) - From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>
• Re: Latin (was Re: Announcement: XML Infoset RequirementsPublished) - From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
• Stateful http xml middleware w/ servlets? - From: Robb Shecter <shecter@d...>
• Streaming XML? [was Re: XML Information Set Requirements..] - From: Tim.Shaw@w...
• Re: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999 - From: Clark Evans <clark.evans@m...>
• RE: Streams, protocols, documents and fragments was: RE: Documents and Document Fragments (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999) - From: Mark Birbeck <Mark.Birbeck@i...>
• Re: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999 - From: "Don Park" <donpark@q...>
• Streams, protocols, documents and fragments was: RE: Documents and Document Fragments (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999) - From: "Borden, Jonathan" <jborden@m...>
• Re: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999 - From: Ralph Ferris <ralph@f...>
• test - From: "Sunny Sun" <sunny@c...>
• Latin (was Re: Announcement: XML Infoset Requirements Published) - From: "James Tauber" <jtauber@j...>
• Re: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999 - From: "James Tauber" <jtauber@j...>
• RE: Announcement: XML Infoset Requirements Published - From: Rob Schoening <rschoening@u...>
• Re: Documents and Document Fragments (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999) - From: "James Tauber" <jtauber@j...>
• layering specs - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Re: Streaming XML (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999) - From: Marcelo Cantos <marcelo@m...>
• RE: Announcement: XML Infoset Requirements Published - From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• XTech '99 starts in two weeks - From: Jon.Bosak@e... (Jon Bosak)
• Announcement: XML to DDML Converter available - From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
• RE: Announcement: XML Infoset Requirements Published - From: Rob Schoening <rschoening@u...>
• Re: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999 - From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• Re: ModSAX (SAX 1.1) Proposal - From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• RE: Announcement: XML Infoset Requirements Published - From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• Re: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999 - From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• RE: Documents and Document Fragments (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999) - From: Mark Birbeck <Mark.Birbeck@i...>
• RE: Streaming XML (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999) - From: Mark Birbeck <Mark.Birbeck@i...>
• RE: Streaming XML (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999) - From: Mark Birbeck <Mark.Birbeck@i...>
• Re: ModSAX (SAX 1.1) Proposal - From: "Don Park" <donpark@q...>
• Re: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999 - From: "Don Park" <donpark@q...>
• Re: Documents and Document Fragments (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999) - From: "James Tauber" <jtauber@j...>
• Re: Streaming XML (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999) - From: Marcelo Cantos <marcelo@m...>
• New MDSAX and Coins release - From: "Bill la Forge" <b.laforge@j...>
• Re: ModSAX (SAX 1.1) Proposal - From: James Clark <jjc@j...>
• Re: ModSAX (SAX 1.1) Proposal - From: "Don Park" <donpark@q...>
• Re: Confusion about conditional sections - From: "Richard L. Goerwitz III" <richard@g...>
• RE: FW: XML Mail - From: "Borden, Jonathan" <jborden@m...>
• RE: Documents and Document Fragments (Was RE: XML Information Set Req uirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999) - From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@n...>
• Streaming XML (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999) - From: Mark Birbeck <Mark.Birbeck@i...>
• Documents and Document Fragments (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999) - From: Mark Birbeck <Mark.Birbeck@i...>
• Re: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999 - From: "Bill la Forge" <b.laforge@j...>
• Re: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999 - From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Re: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999 - From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• Re: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999 - From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
• Re: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999 - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Re: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999 - From: len bullard <cbullard@h...>
• Re: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999 - From: "James Tauber" <jtauber@j...>
• RE: Announcement: XML Infoset Requirements Published - From: Michael.Kay@i...
• Re: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999 - From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
• Re: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999 - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Re: ModSAX (SAX 1.1) Proposal - From: "Bill la Forge" <b.laforge@j...>
• Blockland (was Re: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999) - From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
• Re: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999 - From: "James Tauber" <jtauber@j...>
• Re: ModSAX (SAX 1.1) Proposal - From: James Clark <jjc@j...>
• RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999 - From: <Marc.McDonald@D...>
• Re: Confusion about conditional sections - From: "Chris Olds" <colds@n...>
• XML Product Manager opening at CommerceOne - From: matt@v...
• RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999 - From: <Michael.Orr@D...>
• RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999 - From: "Jeffrey E. Sussna" <jes@k...>
• Re: Exceptions or not (Was: RE: ModSAX (SAX 1.1) Proposal) - From: David Brownell <db@E...>
• RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999 - From: Walter Underwood <wunder@i...>
• From XML to Latin Was: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999 - From: Rob Schoening <rschoening@u...>
• RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999 - From: "Jeffrey E. Sussna" <jes@k...>
• Re: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999 - From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999 - From: "Jeffrey E. Sussna" <jes@k...>
• Re: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999 - From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>
• Re: Confusion about conditional sections - From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>
• Re: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999 - From: Nathan Kurz <nate@v...>
• Re: Confusion about conditional sections - From: David Brownell <db@E...>
• Confusion about conditional sections - From: roddey@u...
• Fw: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999 - From: "Oren Ben-Kiki" <oren@c...>
• Re: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999 - From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>
• ANNOUNCE: IBTWSH draft 5 - From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>
• Re: Announcement: XML Infoset Requirements Published - From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>
• RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999 - From: <Michael.Orr@D...>
• XML Information Set Requirements and XP - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Re: FW: XML Mail - From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>
• xsl tutorials - From: Harold Goldstein <dcbiker@g...>
• RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999 - From: "Jeffrey E. Sussna" <jes@k...>
• Re: FW: XML Mail - From: "Robert Hanson" <rhanson@b...>
• Re: Announcement: XML Infoset Requirements Published - From: Ken MacLeod <ken@b...>
• Re: FW: XML Mail - From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>
• RE: FW: XML Mail - From: "Matthew Sergeant (EML)" <Matthew.Sergeant@e...>
• RE: FW: XML Mail - From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• RE: FW: XML Mail - From: "Borden, Jonathan" <jborden@m...>
• Re: FW: XML Mail - From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>
• Re: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999 - From: Marcus Carr <mrc@a...>
• Re: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999 - From: Clark Evans <clark.evans@m...>
• FW: XML Mail - From: "Borden, Jonathan" <jborden@m...>
• Re: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999 - From: Marcus Carr <mrc@a...>
• RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999 - From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@n...>
• Re: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999 - From: Marcus Carr <mrc@a...>
• XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999 - From: Clark Evans <clark.evans@m...>
• Re: XML Mail - From: Clark Evans <clark.evans@m...>
• A question for developers - From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Announcement: XML Infoset Requirements Published - From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• XML Mail - From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• XML Mail - From: Clark Evans <clark.evans@m...>
• Re: Office 2000 and XML - From: Jerome McDonough <jmcdonou@l...>
• Office 2000 and XML - From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• Re: URIs as IDs in ModSAX (was Re: ModSAX (SAX 1.1) Proposal) (fwd) - From: "Don Park" <donpark@q...>
• Re: XML DTD vs. XML-Data - From: "Jeff Greif" <jmg@t...>
• XML DTD vs. XML-Data - From: "Tiago Moitinho de Almeida" <tma@c...>
• RE: URIs as IDs in ModSAX (was Re: ModSAX (SAX 1.1) Proposal) (fwd) - From: Ron Daniel <RDaniel@D...>
• RE: CV/Resume - From: Mark Birbeck <Mark.Birbeck@i...>
• Re: URIs as IDs in ModSAX (was Re: ModSAX (SAX 1.1) Proposal) (fwd) - From: Robb Shecter <shecter@d...>
• FW: CV/Resume - From: "Livingstone, Stephen" <Livinsb@r...>
• RE: CV/Resume - From: "Matthew Sergeant (EML)" <Matthew.Sergeant@e...>
• Immediate opening for XSL Pro! - From: "Rick Ross" <rick@a...>
• Re: ModSAX (SAX 1.1) Proposal - From: "Don Park" <donpark@q...>
• RE: from a new member - From: Mark Birbeck <Mark.Birbeck@i...>
• Re: URIs as IDs in ModSAX (was Re: ModSAX (SAX 1.1) Proposal) (fwd) - From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>
• Re: from a new member - From: Ruth Bergman <Ruth@j...>
• Re: URIs as IDs in ModSAX (was Re: ModSAX (SAX 1.1) Proposal) (fwd) - From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• Re: URIs as IDs in ModSAX (was Re: ModSAX (SAX 1.1) Proposal) (fwd) - From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>
• Re: URIs as IDs in ModSAX - From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>
• Re: URIs as IDs in ModSAX (was Re: ModSAX (SAX 1.1) Proposal) (fwd) - From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• Re: URIs as IDs in ModSAX (was Re: ModSAX (SAX 1.1) Proposal) (fwd) - From: Dan Brickley <Daniel.Brickley@b...>
• RE: ModSAX (SAX 1.1) Proposal - From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• Re: URIs as IDs in ModSAX (was Re: ModSAX (SAX 1.1) Proposal) (fwd) - From: Robb Shecter <shecter@d...>
• RE: ModSAX (SAX 1.1) Proposal - From: "Ingargiola, Tito" <ti64877@i...>
• RE: Exceptions or not (Was: RE: ModSAX (SAX 1.1) Proposal) - From: Miles Sabin <msabin@c...>
• Re: Exceptions or not - From: Toby Speight <tms@a...>
• URIs as IDs in ModSAX (was Re: ModSAX (SAX 1.1) Proposal) (fwd) - From: Dan Brickley <Daniel.Brickley@b...>
• RE: Exceptions or not (Was: RE: ModSAX (SAX 1.1) Proposal) - From: Jarle Stabell <jarle.stabell@d...>
• Re: ModSAX (SAX 1.1) Proposal (fwd) - From: Dan Brickley <Daniel.Brickley@b...>
• Exceptions or not (Was: RE: ModSAX (SAX 1.1) Proposal) - From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• RE: ModSAX (SAX 1.1) Proposal - From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• Exceptions or not (Was: RE: ModSAX (SAX 1.1) Proposal) - From: Jarle Stabell <jarle.stabell@d...>
• RXP 1.0 released - From: Richard Tobin <richard@c...>
• RE: ModSAX (SAX 1.1) Proposal - From: "Ingargiola, Tito" <ti64877@i...>
• RE: XML conferences in the UK - From: "Livingstone, Stephen" <Livinsb@r...>
• Re: ModSAX (SAX 1.1) Proposal - From: Tyler Baker <tyler@i...>
• Re: XML conferences in the UK - From: Robin Cover <robin@i...>
• Why SAX doesn't have a requirements document (was Re: ModSAX (SAX 1.1) Proposal) - From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• from a new member - From: Prashanth Lakshmi Narayanan <PrashanthL@i...>
• XML conferences in the UK - From: Kaustav Bhattacharya <k.bhattacharya@b...>
• Re: ModSAX (SAX 1.1) Proposal - From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• RE: ModSAX (SAX 1.1) Proposal - From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• XML 1.0 Errata, one year later - From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• No subject given - From: "Joseph DeArce" <jdearce@t...>
• FW: Namespaces - From: Serrat Jaime - jasr <jasr@i...>
• XML Schema Requirements out - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• attaching files - From: jayadeva@l... (Jayadeva Babu Gali)
• xml-dev Digest V1 #242 - From: "Oren Ben-Kiki" <oren@c...>
• servlet/xml/xsl - From: jayadeva@l... (Jayadeva Babu Gali)
• RE: DOM vs. SAX??? Nah. (was RE: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?) - From: Michael.Kay@i...
• ANNOUNCING SAXON 4.0 - From: Michael.Kay@i...
• Re: ModSAX (SAX 1.1) Proposal - From: Tyler Baker <tyler@i...>
• Re: Valid RDF and security - From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
• Re: ModSAX (SAX 1.1) Proposal - From: Clark Evans <clark.evans@m...>
• Re: ModSAX (SAX 1.1) Proposal - From: "Don Park" <donpark@q...>
• Re: X3D - From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• X3D - From: len bullard <cbullard@h...>
• RE: ModSAX (SAX 1.1) Proposal - From: Jarle Stabell <jarle.stabell@d...>
• ModSAX (SAX 1.1) Proposal - From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• Re: Roll-Your-Own Parsers - From: roddey@u...
• Re: Valid RDF and security - From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• Re: Announcement: DocZilla Preview and all-new Demo Kit - From: Michael Leventhal <mlelist@c...>
• Valid RDF and security - From: Robb Shecter <shecter@d...>
• Re: Announcement: DocZilla Preview and all-new Demo Kit - From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Re: Announcement: DocZilla Preview and all-new Demo Kit - From: Robb Shecter <shecter@d...>
• Re: Announcement: DocZilla Preview and all-new Demo Kit - From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
• Re: xml-dev Digest V1 #242 - From: keshlam@u...
• Announcement: DocZilla Preview and all-new Demo Kit - From: Mirja Hukari <mirja.hukari@c...>
• Suggestions for clean-specs (was: Clean specs) - From: MikeDacon@a...
• XML Data Structure ... - From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• Re: ? DOM committee to "address this issue"? [Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces...] - From: Tyler Baker <tyler@i...>
• Re: Ms. Manners - From: "Don Park" <donpark@q...>
• ? DOM committee to "address this issue"? [Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces...] - From: james anderson <James.Anderson@m...>
• XML Data Structure ... - From: "Dinesh Vadhia" <dineshv@e...>
• SAX2 (was Re: DOM vs. SAX??? Nah. ) - From: "Bill la Forge" <b.laforge@j...>
• Fw: DOM vs. SAX??? Nah. (was RE: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?) - From: "Oren Ben-Kiki" <oren@c...>
• Re: Roll-Your-Own Parsers - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Advantages of XML and SGML - From: Clark Evans <clark.evans@m...>
• RE: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: Chris Lovett <clovett@m...>
• Ms. Manners - From: roddey@u...
• Re: Roll-Your-Own Parsers (was: Re: What Clean Specs Achieve) - From: roddey@u...
• InheritanceFilter improved - From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>
• re: RDF, Namespaces, and Versioning? - From: roddey@u...
• Re: Slowness of JDK 1.1.x String.intern() [was Re: SAX, Java, and Namespaces ] - From: David Brownell <db@E...>
• Re: DOM vs. SAX??? Nah. (was RE: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?) - From: "Don Park" <donpark@q...>
• Re: DOM vs. SAX??? Nah. (was RE: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?) - From: Clark Evans <clark.evans@m...>
• Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: "Bill la Forge" <b.laforge@j...>
• Re: Slowness of JDK 1.1.x String.intern() [was Re: SAX, Java, and Namespaces ] - From: james anderson <James.Anderson@m...>
• Re: DOM vs. SAX??? Nah. (was RE: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?) - From: "Bill la Forge" <b.laforge@j...>
• DOM vs. SAX??? Nah. (was RE: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?) - From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>
• Re: trying to understand the roll of XML - From: Jonathan Eisenzopf <eisen@p...>
• DOM vs. SAX??? Nah. (was RE: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?) - From: "Oren Ben-Kiki" <oren@c...>
• Re: Slowness of JDK 1.1.x String.intern() [was Re: SAX, Java, and Namespaces ] - From: Tyler Baker <tyler@i...>
• Re: Slowness of JDK 1.1.x String.intern() [was Re: SAX, Java, and Namespaces ] - From: David Brownell <db@E...>
• Re: Roll-Your-Own Parsers (was: Re: What Clean Specs Achieve) - From: David Brownell <db@E...>
• Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: Tyler Baker <tyler@i...>
• Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: James Clark <jjc@j...>
• Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: Marcelo Cantos <marcelo@m...>
• Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: "Don Park" <donpark@q...>
• Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: Tyler Baker <tyler@i...>
• Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: "Bill la Forge" <b.laforge@j...>
• Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: "Bill la Forge" <b.laforge@j...>
• Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: Tyler Baker <tyler@i...>
• Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: Marcelo Cantos <marcelo@m...>
• Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: Tyler Baker <tyler@i...>
• re: DOM vs. SAX??? Nah. - From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• Fw: DOM vs. SAX??? Nah. (was RE: Storing Lots of FiddlyBits (was Re: What is XML for?) - From: Clark Evans <clark.evans@m...>
• Re: Fw: DOM vs. SAX??? Nah. (was RE: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?) - From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>
• Re: Fw: DOM vs. SAX??? Nah. (was RE: Storing Lots of FiddlyBits (was Re: What is XML for?) - From: Clark Evans <clark.evans@m...>
• Re: XML Parser with DOM in C - From: keshlam@u...
• Re: Fw: DOM vs. SAX??? Nah. (was RE: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?) - From: Walter Underwood <wunder@i...>
• RE: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• RE: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: Michael.Kay@i...
• Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: "Rick Ross" <rick@a...>
• RE: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: "Matthew Sergeant (EML)" <Matthew.Sergeant@e...>
• Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: keshlam@u...
• Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• Schema Muddle (was Quite Standards Questions) - From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: "Rick Ross" <rick@a...>
• Re: Roll-Your-Own Parsers (was: Re: What Clean Specs Achieve) - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• Misattribution (was Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces...) - From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: "Rick Ross" <rick@a...>
• Re: an initial idea for an XML überdocument shell (was Re: CORBA's not boring yet. / XML in an OS?) - From: David Mohring <heretic@i...>
• Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: "Bill la Forge" <b.laforge@j...>
• Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: Tyler Baker <tyler@i...>
• Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: Tyler Baker <tyler@i...>
• Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: Tyler Baker <tyler@i...>
• Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: Tyler Baker <tyler@i...>
• Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: "Rick Ross" <rick@a...>
• RE: Quite Standards Questions - From: Ronald Bourret <rbourret@i...>
• Fw: DOM vs. SAX??? Nah. (was RE: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?) - From: "Oren Ben-Kiki" <oren@c...>
• Quite Standards Questions - From: "Richard Anderson" <rja@a...>
• Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: "Rick Ross" <rick@a...>
• Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: "Rick Ross" <rick@a...>
• Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• DOM vs. SAX??? Nah. (was RE: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?) - From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• Re: RDF, Namespaces, and Versioning? - From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• Re: Possible enhancements to Namespaces to allow valiadation - From: james anderson <James.Anderson@m...>
• RE: Word and XML (was: XML standards coherency and so forth) - From: Tony McDonald <tony.mcdonald@n...>
• Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: James Clark <jjc@j...>
• Re: dynamically XML - From: "Steve Muench" <SMUENCH@u...>
• Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: Tyler Baker <tyler@i...>
• dynamically XML - From: jayadeva@l... (Jayadeva Babu Gali)
• Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Re: Roll-Your-Own Parsers (was: Re: What Clean Specs Achieve) - From: Tyler Baker <tyler@i...>
• Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: Tyler Baker <tyler@i...>
• Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: Tyler Baker <tyler@i...>
• Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: Tyler Baker <tyler@i...>
• Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: Tyler Baker <tyler@i...>
• Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: Tyler Baker <tyler@i...>
• Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: James Clark <jjc@j...>
• Re: Roll-Your-Own Parsers (was: Re: What Clean Specs Achieve) - From: "Bill la Forge" <b.laforge@j...>
• Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: "Bill la Forge" <b.laforge@j...>
• Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: "Don Park" <donpark@q...>
• RE: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: Andrew Layman <andrewl@m...>
• Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: Rob Schoening <rschoening@u...>
• Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: "Don Park" <donpark@q...>
• Possible enhancements to Namespaces to allow valiadation - From: <Marc.McDonald@D...>
• Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: Tyler Baker <tyler@i...>
• Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: Tyler Baker <tyler@i...>
• Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: Tyler Baker <tyler@i...>
• RE: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?) - From: keshlam@u...
• Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: Tyler Baker <tyler@i...>
• Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: "Rick Ross" <rick@a...>
• Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: "Rick Ross" <rick@a...>
• RE: what is "completely different" [Re: RDF, Namespaces, and Versioning?] - From: Andrew Layman <andrewl@m...>
• re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: "Rick Ross" <rick@a...>
• Re: Roll-Your-Own Parsers (was: Re: What Clean Specs Achieve) - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• what is "completely different" [Re: RDF, Namespaces, and Versioning?] - From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• what is "completely different" [Re: RDF, Namespaces, and Versioning?] - From: james anderson <James.Anderson@m...>
• Architectural Forms and Namespaces (Was: Re: SAX, Java, and Namespaces ) - From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• RE: Word and XML (was: XML standards coherency and so forth) - From: "Biron,Paul V" <Paul.V.Biron@k...>
• Re: RDF, Namespaces, and Versioning? - From: "James Tauber" <jtauber@j...>
• Re: XML Parser with DOM in C - From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
• Re: RDF, Namespaces, and Versioning? - From: Clark Evans <clark.evans@m...>
• Re: XML Parser with DOM in C - From: "Richard Anderson" <rja@a...>
• RE: XML Parser with DOM in C - From: "Matthew Sergeant (EML)" <Matthew.Sergeant@e...>
• re: RDF, Namespaces, and Versioning? - From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• Roll-Your-Own Parsers (was: Re: What Clean Specs Achieve) - From: hpyle@a...
• RE: "Namespaces in XML" idea? - From: Michael.Kay@i...
• Fractal XML Index Notation - From: Clark Evans <clark.evans@m...>
• Re: What Clean Specs Achieve - From: Tyler Baker <tyler@i...>
• ANN: IBM XML Parser for Java (XML4J) v2.0.0 - From: TAMURA Kent <kent@t...>
• Namespace Registry? And what about Architectures? - From: Clark Evans <clark.evans@m...>
• Re: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?) - From: uche.ogbuji@f...
• RDF, Namespaces, and Versioning? - From: Clark Evans <clark.evans@m...>
• Re: What Clean Specs Achieve - From: roddey@u...
• Bluestone XML Product Family - From: "Atkins, Jon" <jatkins@B...>
• Re: "Namespaces in XML" idea? - From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• Re: URL: 19 Short Questions about Namespaces (with Answers) - From: Tyler Baker <tyler@i...>
• Re: "Namespaces in XML" idea? - From: Tyler Baker <tyler@i...>
• Re: "Namespaces in XML" idea? - From: Tyler Baker <tyler@i...>
• Re: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?) - From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• Data Model Patterns (Was: Groves and Architectural Forms) - From: Clark Evans <clark.evans@m...>
• Re: URL: 19 Short Questions about Namespaces (with Answers) - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Re: HTML, XML, XML-RPC in one net app - From: Deke Smith <deke@t...>
• Re: "Namespaces in XML" idea? - From: James Clark <jjc@j...>
• RE: "Namespaces in XML" idea? - From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• RE: "Namespaces in XML" idea? - From: Dan Brickley <Daniel.Brickley@b...>
• RE: "Namespaces in XML" idea? - From: Ronald Bourret <rbourret@i...>
• Re: "Namespaces in XML" idea? - From: Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@i...>
• Re: "Clean Specs" - From: Jack Park <jackpark@t...>
• OS-XML was: Re: CORBA's not boring yet. / XML in an OS? - From: Jack Park <jackpark@t...>
• RE: "Clean Specs" - From: "Lauren Wood" <lauren@s...>
• Re: Fw: "Clean Specs" - From: "Lauren Wood" <lauren@s...>
• RE: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?) - From: "Borden, Jonathan" <jborden@m...>
• Re: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?) - From: uche.ogbuji@f...
• RE: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?) - From: "Borden, Jonathan" <jborden@m...>
• Re: URL: 19 Short Questions about Namespaces (with Answers) - From: James Clark <jjc@j...>
• Re: Fw: "Clean Specs" - From: "Don Park" <donpark@q...>
• Re: "Clean Specs" - From: "Frank Boumphrey" <bckman@i...>
• "Namespaces in XML" idea? - From: Tyler Baker <tyler@i...>
• Re: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?) - From: Marcelo Cantos <marcelo@m...>
• Re: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?) - From: "Steven R. Newcomb" <srn@t...>
• RE: What Clean Specs Achieve, WAS: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces - From: Mark Birbeck <Mark.Birbeck@i...>
• RE: What Clean Specs Achieve, WAS: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces - From: Daniel Austin <daniela@c...>
• RE: What Clean Specs Achieve, WAS: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces - From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• RE: What Clean Specs Achieve, WAS: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces - From: Mark Birbeck <Mark.Birbeck@i...>
• Re: "Clean Specs" - From: Marcus Carr <mrc@a...>
• Re: URL: 19 Short Questions about Namespaces (with Answers) - From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• RE: What Clean Specs Achieve, WAS: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces - From: Rob Schoening <rschoening@u...>
• RE: "Clean Specs" - From: "Buss, Jason A" <jabuss@c...>
• Re: Fw: "Clean Specs" - From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>
• URL: 19 Short Questions about Namespaces (with Answers) - From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• Fw: "Clean Specs" - From: "Oren Ben-Kiki" <oren@c...>
• Re: A New Hope (was Re: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?)) - From: spreitze@p...
• RE: What Clean Specs Achieve, WAS: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces - From: Mark Birbeck <Mark.Birbeck@i...>
• RE: XDK - From: "Jeffrey E. Sussna" <jes@k...>
• Re: XDK - From: "Don Park" <donpark@q...>
• XML Parser with DOM in C - From: "David E. Cleary" <davec@p...>
• Re: Fw: "Clean Specs" - From: Tyler Baker <tyler@i...>
• Re: Fw: Fw: "Clean Specs" - From: Tyler Baker <tyler@i...>
• Re: What Clean Specs Achieve, WAS: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces - From: Clark Evans <clark.evans@m...>
• XDK - From: Clark Evans <clark.evans@m...>
• RE: What Clean Specs Achieve, WAS: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces - From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Re: What Clean Specs Achieve, WAS: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces - From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>
• XML-RPC & HTTP-NG (was A critique of XML-RPC) - From: "Ingargiola, Tito" <ti64877@i...>
• RE: What Clean Specs Achieve, WAS: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces - From: Rob Schoening <rschoening@u...>
• Fw: Fw: "Clean Specs" - From: "Oren Ben-Kiki" <oren@c...>
• Re: Fw: "Clean Specs" - From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Re: Fw: "Clean Specs" - From: Tyler Baker <tyler@i...>
• Re: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?) - From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• DOM API - From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• RE: When to use attributes vs. elements - From: Andrew Layman <andrewl@m...>
• RE: What Clean Specs Achieve, WAS: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces - From: peter@w... (Peter Seibel)
• Re: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?) - From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• Re: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?) - From: Clark Evans <clark.evans@m...>
• Fw: "Clean Specs" - From: "Oren Ben-Kiki" <oren@c...>
• Re: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?) - From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• Re: A New Hope (was Re: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?)) - From: spreitze@p...
• Re: document vs non-document entity (was Re: CORBA's not boring yet. / XML in an OS?) - From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• an initial idea for an XML überdocument shell (was Re: CORBA's not boring yet. / XML in an OS?) - From: "James Tauber" <jtauber@j...>
• Clear specs: Audience - From: Clark Evans <clark.evans@m...>
• Re: Clear specs: suggestions - From: "John E. Simpson" <simpson@p...>
• Re: "Clean Specs" - From: Avi Rappoport <avirr@L...>
• Re: CORBA's not boring yet. / XML in an OS? - From: "Fredrik Lindgren" <f.lindgren@u...>
• Re: Clear specs: suggestions - From: "Frank Boumphrey" <bckman@i...>
• Re: "Clean Specs" - From: Tyler Baker <tyler@i...>
• Re: "Clean Specs" - From: "Lauren Wood" <lauren@s...>
• Re: CORBA's not boring yet. / XML in an OS? - From: Robb Shecter <shecter@d...>
• Re: "Clean Specs" - From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
• Re: CORBA's not boring yet. / XML in an OS? - From: Tyler Baker <tyler@i...>
• "Clean Specs" - From: <JEROME.YUROW@h...>
• [corrected] 19 Short Questions about Namespaces (with Answers) - From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• RE: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces - From: Ron Daniel <RDaniel@D...>
• Clear specs: suggestions - From: "John E. Simpson" <simpson@p...>
• 19 Short Questions about Namespaces (with Answers) - From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• Re: CORBA's not boring yet. / XML in an OS? - From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
• Re: problem - From: Shekhar Kshirsagar <skshirsa@n...>
• Re: "Clean Specs" - From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• Announcement: 4DOM 0.7.0 - From: uche.ogbuji@f...
• Re: "Clean Specs" - From: james anderson <James.Anderson@m...>
• Re: document vs non-document entity (was Re: CORBA's not boring yet. / XML in an OS?) - From: james anderson <James.Anderson@m...>
• problem - From: jayadeva@l... (Jayadeva Babu Gali)
• RE: When to use attributes vs. elements - From: Dan Brickley <Daniel.Brickley@b...>
• RE: "Clean Specs" - From: Ronald Bourret <rbourret@i...>
• RE: "Clean Specs" - From: Ronald Bourret <rbourret@i...>
• Re: CORBA's not boring yet. / XML in an OS? - From: Robb Shecter <shecter@d...>
• Re: CORBA's not boring yet. / XML in an OS? - From: Robb Shecter <shecter@d...>
• Little problem with namespace - From: "Buster Blues" <busterdeniro@h...>
• Re: Component Markup Language - From: Robb Shecter <shecter@d...>
• Re: Component Markup Language - From: Robb Shecter <shecter@d...>
• Re: "Clean Specs" - From: Tyler Baker <tyler@i...>
• RE: "Clean Specs" - From: Murray Maloney <murray@m...>
• Re: "Clean Specs" - From: Murray Maloney <murray@m...>
• Re: "Clean Specs" - From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• RE: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?) - From: "Borden, Jonathan" <jborden@m...>
• Re: "Clean Specs" - From: Tyler Baker <tyler@i...>
• Re: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?) - From: uche.ogbuji@f...
• RE: "Clean Specs" - From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• RE: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?) - From: "W. Eliot Kimber" <eliot@d...>
• Re: "Clean Specs" - From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>
• RE: "Clean Specs" - From: Murray Maloney <murray@m...>
• Re: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?) - From: "Bill la Forge" <b.laforge@j...>
• RE: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?) - From: "Borden, Jonathan" <jborden@m...>
• Re: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?) - From: uche.ogbuji@f...
• Re: "Clean Specs" - From: uche.ogbuji@f...
• Re: "Clean Specs" - From: "Don Park" <donpark@q...>
• Re: "Clean Specs" - From: uche.ogbuji@f...
• RE: "Clean Specs" - From: "Borden, Jonathan" <jborden@m...>
• Re: "Clean Specs" - From: Murray Maloney <murray@m...>
• XML e-mail viewer was RE: CORBA's not boring yet. / XML in an OS? - From: "Borden, Jonathan" <jborden@m...>
• Re: "Clean Specs" - From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Re: RDF (was Re: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces) - From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• Re: "Clean Specs" - From: "Frank Boumphrey" <bckman@i...>
• Re: "Clean Specs" - From: "Don Park" <donpark@q...>
• Re: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?) - From: Marcelo Cantos <marcelo@m...>
• Re: "Clean Specs" - From: "W. Eliot Kimber" <eliot@d...>
• Re: "Clean Specs" - From: "W. Eliot Kimber" <eliot@d...>
• Re: "Clean Specs" - From: Murray Maloney <murray@m...>
• Re: "Clean Specs" - From: "Liam R. E. Quin" <liamquin@i...>
• Re: "Clean Specs" - From: James Robertson <jamesr@s...>
• Re: RDF (was Re: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces) - From: James Robertson <jamesr@s...>
• Re: "Clean Specs" - From: James Robertson <jamesr@s...>
• Re: "Clean Specs" - From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Re: "Clean Specs" - From: "W. Eliot Kimber" <eliot@d...>
• Re: "Clean Specs" - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Re: "Clean Specs" - From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Re: DTD: Extra Complexity? - From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• XSL and namespaces - From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• Re: document vs non-document entity (was Re: CORBA's not boring yet. / XML in an OS?) - From: "James Tauber" <jtauber@j...>
• Re: DTD: Extra Complexity? - From: "Steven R. Newcomb" <srn@t...>
• Re: "Clean Specs" - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Re: Extra Complexity? - From: Jeff Greif <jmg@t...>
• RE: "Clean Specs" - From: "Borden, Jonathan" <jborden@m...>
• Re: RDF (was Re: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces) - From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• Re: Extra Complexity? - From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• Re: document vs non-document entity (was Re: CORBA's not boring yet. / XML in an OS?) - From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• "Clean Specs" - From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• Re: Namespace Applications - From: james anderson <James.Anderson@m...>
• Re: document vs non-document entity (was Re: CORBA's not boring yet. / XML in an OS?) - From: james anderson <James.Anderson@m...>
• Re: Namespaces and DTDs was RE: Namespaces and interoperability (was Re: SAX, Java, and Namespaces) - From: james anderson <James.Anderson@m...>
• Re: A critique of XML-RPC - From: Dave Winer <dave@u...>
• Re: document vs non-document entity (was Re: CORBA's not boring yet. / XML in an OS?) - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• document vs non-document entity (was Re: CORBA's not boring yet. / XML in an OS?) - From: "James Tauber" <jtauber@j...>
• CORBA's not boring yet. / XML in an OS? - From: "Oren Ben-Kiki" <oren@c...>
• Re: What Clean Specs Achieve - From: uche.ogbuji@f...
• Re: What Clean Specs Achieve, WAS: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Na mespaces - From: uche.ogbuji@f...
• Re: CORBA's not boring yet. / XML in an OS? - From: "James Tauber" <jtauber@j...>
• Re: Component Markup Language - From: "James Tauber" <jtauber@j...>
• Re: CORBA's not boring yet. / XML in an OS? - From: uche.ogbuji@f...
• RE: What Clean Specs Achieve - From: "Borden, Jonathan" <jborden@m...>
• A critique of XML-RPC - From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>
• Re: Extra Complexity? - From: "Frank Boumphrey" <bckman@i...>
• Namespaces and DTDs was RE: Namespaces and interoperability (was Re: SAX, Java, and Namespaces) - From: "Borden, Jonathan" <jborden@m...>
• RDF (was Re: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces) - From: James Robertson <jamesr@s...>
• Average developers (was Re: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces) - From: James Robertson <jamesr@s...>
• Namespaces and interoperability (was Re: SAX, Java, and Namespaces) - From: James Robertson <jamesr@s...>
• MDSAX beta2 includes filters for namespace and architectural forms - From: "Bill la Forge" <b.laforge@j...>
• Re: Extra Complexity? - From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>
• Re: Extra Complexity? - From: "Samuel R. Blackburn" <sblackbu@e...>
• Re: DTD: Extra Complexity? - From: Clark Evans <clark.evans@m...>
• DTD: Extra Complexity? - From: "Dan Holle" <dan@h...>
• What is XML? (Was: Re: What Clean Specs Achieve) - From: Clark Evans <clark.evans@m...>
• Re: What Clean Specs Achieve - From: Clark Evans <clark.evans@m...>
• ANN: xmlproc 0.60 - From: Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@i...>
• RE: What Clean Specs Achieve - From: Mark Birbeck <Mark.Birbeck@i...>
• RE: What Clean Specs Achieve - From: Mark Birbeck <Mark.Birbeck@i...>
• Re: What Clean Specs Achieve - From: Tyler Baker <tyler@i...>
• RE: What Clean Specs Achieve - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Re: What Clean Specs Achieve - From: james anderson <James.Anderson@m...>
• Re: Namespace Applications - From: Gabe Beged-Dov <begeddov@j...>
• RE: What Clean Specs Achieve - From: Mark Birbeck <Mark.Birbeck@i...>
• Re: What Clean Specs Achieve - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Namespace Applications - From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• Re: What Clean Specs Achieve - From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Re: COBOL XML parser? - From: james anderson <James.Anderson@m...>
• Re: What Clean Specs Achieve - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• RE: What Clean Specs Achieve, WAS: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces - From: Mark Birbeck <Mark.Birbeck@i...>
• Re: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces - From: "Bill la Forge" <b.laforge@j...>
• Re: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces - From: "Frank Boumphrey" <bckman@i...>
• What Clean Specs Achieve, WAS: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces - From: "Bill la Forge" <b.laforge@j...>
• Re: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Re: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces - From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• RE: When to use attributes vs. elements - From: Andrew Layman <andrewl@m...>
• Re: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces - From: Tyler Baker <tyler@i...>
• Re: Slowness of JDK 1.1.x String.intern() [was Re: SAX, Java,and Namespaces ] - From: Tyler Baker <tyler@i...>
• RE: Namespaces does *not* formally introduce "global attributes" - From: Mark Birbeck <Mark.Birbeck@i...>
• Re: Namespaces does *not* formally introduce "global attributes" - From: Tyler Baker <tyler@i...>
• Re: SAX, Java, and Namespaces (was Re: Restricted NamespacesforXML) - From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• Re: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces - From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• Re: Architectural Forms and Namespaces (Was: Re: SAX, Java, and Namespaces ) - From: "W. Eliot Kimber" <eliot@d...>
• Re: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces - From: Avi Rappoport <avirr@L...>
• RE: CORBA's not boring yet. / XML in an OS? - From: "Jeffrey E. Sussna" <jes@k...>
• Re: Slowness of JDK 1.1.x String.intern() [was Re: SAX, Java, and Namespaces ] - From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Slowness of JDK 1.1.x String.intern() [was Re: SAX, Java, and Namespaces ] - From: "Jeff Greif" <jmg@t...>
• Namespaces for "average programmers" - From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• RE: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces - From: Mark Birbeck <Mark.Birbeck@i...>
• Re: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Re: When to use attributes vs. elements - From: "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@C...>
• RE: When to use attributes vs. elements - From: Dan Brickley <Daniel.Brickley@b...>
• Architectural Forms and Namespaces (Was: Re: SAX, Java, and Namespaces ) - From: Clark Evans <clark.evans@m...>
• Re: SAX, Java, and Namespaces (was Re: Restricted Namespaces forXML) - From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Re: COBOL XML parser? - From: Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@i...>
• Re: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces - From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• RE: When to use attributes vs. elements - From: Andrew Layman <andrewl@m...>
• Re: When to use attributes vs. elements - From: "John E. Simpson" <simpson@p...>
• RE: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces - From: Ronald Bourret <rbourret@i...>
• Re: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces - From: Jerome McDonough <jmcdonou@l...>
• Re: A weaker XSL? - From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• XML Spy v1.4 released - From: "Falk, Alexander" <falk@i...>
• Re: SAX, Java, and Namespaces (was Re: Restricted Namespaces forXML) - From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• RE: Namespaces does *not* formally introduce "global attributes" - From: Mark Birbeck <Mark.Birbeck@i...>
• FW: MSXML 1.0 - From: Charles Gamble <Charles.Gamble@s...>
• SAXON (Was: Re: A weaker XSL?) - From: Clark Evans <clark.evans@m...>
• Re: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces - From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• MSXML 1.0 - From: Charles Gamble <Charles.Gamble@s...>
• Re: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces - From: Dave Winer <dave@u...>
• When to use attributes vs. elements - From: peter@w... (Peter Seibel)
• Re: A weaker XSL? - From: Clark Evans <clark.evans@m...>
• Re: A New Hope (was Re: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?)) - From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
• Re: A weaker XSL? - From: Clark Evans <clark.evans@m...>
• RE: SAX, Java, and Namespaces (was Re: Restricted Namespaces forXML) - From: "Borden, Jonathan" <jborden@m...>
• Re: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Re: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces - From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• Re: SAX, Java, and Namespaces (was Re: Restricted NamespacesforXML) - From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• Re: Fw: Namespaces does *not* formally introduce "global attributes" - From: james anderson <James.Anderson@m...>
• Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Re: Component Markup Language - From: "Frank Boumphrey" <bckman@i...>
• New XML Resources page (Re: Using XSL as a Validation Language) - From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
• Re: A weaker XSL? - From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• Re: SAX, Java, and Namespaces (was Re: Restricted Namespaces forXML) - From: hpyle@a...
• RE: A weaker XSL? - From: Michael.Kay@i...
• HTML, XML, XML-RPC in one net app - From: Dave Winer <dave@u...>
• 'How to unsubscribe?' information is attached to every mail. - From: Shekhar Kshirsagar <skshirsa@n...>
• RE: A weaker XSL? - From: "Matthew Sergeant (EML)" <Matthew.Sergeant@e...>
• Re: SAX, Java, and Namespaces (was Re: Restricted Namespaces forXML) - From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• RE: Namespaces does *not* formally introduce "global attributes" - From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• Re: A weaker XSL? - From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• RE: Namespaces does *not* formally introduce "global attributes" - From: Mark Birbeck <Mark.Birbeck@i...>
• Re: SAX, Java, and Namespaces (was Re: Restricted Namespaces for XML) - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• No Subject - From: "Benedetto, Christopher" <CBenedet@B...>
• Re: CORBA's not boring yet. / XML in an OS? - From: Daniel Veillard <Daniel.Veillard@w...>
• RE: CORBA's not boring yet. / XML in an OS? - From: Dave Winer <dave@u...>
• RE: Namespace clashes? - From: Ronald Bourret <rbourret@i...>
• RE: Component Markup Language - From: "Matthew Sergeant (EML)" <Matthew.Sergeant@e...>
• RE: CORBA's not boring yet. / XML in an OS? - From: "Matthew Sergeant (EML)" <Matthew.Sergeant@e...>
• Fw: Namespaces does *not* formally introduce "global attributes" - From: "Oren Ben-Kiki" <oren@c...>
• RE: A weaker XSL? - From: "Matthew Sergeant (EML)" <Matthew.Sergeant@e...>
• RE: CORBA's not boring yet. / XML in an OS? - From: "Matthew Sergeant (EML)" <Matthew.Sergeant@e...>
• Re: SAX, Java, and Namespaces (was Re: Restricted Namespaces for XML) - From: hpyle@a...
• Re: Component Markup Language - From: matt@v...
• Re: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?) - From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• Re: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?) - From: Clark Evans <clark.evans@m...>
• RE: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?) - From: "Borden, Jonathan" <jborden@m...>
• HDBMS vs RDBMS (Was: Re: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?)) - From: Clark Evans <clark.evans@m...>
• RE: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?) - From: "Borden, Jonathan" <jborden@m...>
• Re: Component Markup Language - From: len bullard <cbullard@h...>
• Re: Component Markup Language - From: "Frank Boumphrey" <bckman@i...>
• Re: Component Markup Language - From: "Frank Boumphrey" <bckman@i...>
• Re: SAX, Java, and Namespaces (was Re: Restricted Namespacesfor XML) - From: Tyler Baker <tyler@i...>
• Re: SAX, Java, and Namespaces (was Re: Restricted Namespaces for XML) - From: Tyler Baker <tyler@i...>
• Re: SAX, Java, and Namespaces (was Re: Restricted Namespaces for XML) - From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Re: SAX, Java, and Namespaces (was Re: Restricted Namespaces for XML) - From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• Re: CORBA's not boring yet. / XML in an OS? - From: Dave Winer <dave@u...>
• Re: Fw: Namespaces does *not* formally introduce "global attributes" - From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Re: SAX, Java, and Namespaces (was Re: Restricted Namespaces for XML) - From: Tyler Baker <tyler@i...>
• Re: A weaker XSL? - From: Pavel Velikhov <pvelikho@c...>
• Re: CORBA's not boring yet. / XML in an OS? - From: spreitze@p...
• Re: A weaker XSL? - From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• Fw: Namespaces does *not* formally introduce "global attributes" - From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• SAX, Java, and Namespaces (was Re: Restricted Namespaces for XML) - From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• Re: A weaker XSL? - From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• Re: A weaker XSL? - From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• Re: A weaker XSL? - From: Clark Evans <clark.evans@m...>
• Re: A weaker XSL? - From: peter@w... (Peter Seibel)
• Re: Namespaces does *not* formally introduce "global attributes" - From: "Bill la Forge" <b.laforge@j...>
• Fw: Namespaces does *not* formally introduce "global attributes" - From: "Oren Ben-Kiki" <oren@c...>
• RE: CORBA's not boring yet. / XML in an OS? - From: Ed Howland <Ed@d...>
• RE: Component Markup Language - From: Mark Birbeck <Mark.Birbeck@i...>
• Proposal: New Syntax for DSSSL (was Re: MS patents style sheets) - From: "W. Eliot Kimber" <eliot@d...>
• RE: Component Markup Language - From: Mark Birbeck <Mark.Birbeck@i...>
• Re: CORBA's not boring yet. / XML in an OS? - From: Tyler Baker <tyler@i...>
• Re: Fw: Namespaces - From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>
• Re: A weaker XSL? - From: Clark Evans <clark.evans@m...>
• Re: Fw: Namespaces - From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Re: Restricted Namespaces for XML - From: Tyler Baker <tyler@i...>
• MS patents style sheets - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• RE: Component Markup Language - From: Dave Winer <dave@u...>
• RE: CORBA's not boring yet. / XML in an OS? - From: "Ingargiola, Tito" <ti64877@i...>
• Re: A weaker XSL? - From: Clark Evans <clark.evans@m...>
• RE: Component Markup Language - From: "Benedetto, Christopher" <CBenedet@B...>
• Re: Fw: Namespaces - From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>
• Re: A weaker XSL? - From: Tyler Baker <tyler@i...>
• Re: Restricted Namespaces for XML - From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• RE: Component Markup Language - From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Re: A weaker XSL? - From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• CORBA's not boring yet. / XML in an OS? - From: Robb Shecter <shecter@d...>
• RE: Namespace clashes? - From: "Ogievetsky, Nikita" <nikita.ogievetsky@c...>
• RE: Namespaces does *not* formally introduce "global attributes" - From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• RE: Component Markup Language - From: Nigel Hutchison <nwoh@s...>
• Re: Component Markup Language - From: Robb Shecter <shecter@d...>
• RE: Component Markup Language - From: "Matthew Sergeant (EML)" <Matthew.Sergeant@e...>
• RE: Component Markup Language - From: Dave Winer <dave@u...>
• RE: Component Markup Language - From: Mark Birbeck <Mark.Birbeck@i...>
• Re: Component Markup Language - From: Robb Shecter <shecter@d...>
• RE: Namespaces does *not* formally introduce "global attributes" - From: Ronald Bourret <rbourret@i...>
• Re: Component Markup Language - From: "Bill la Forge" <b.laforge@j...>
• RE: Component Markup Language - From: "Benedetto, Christopher" <CBenedet@B...>
• RE: Component Markup Language - From: "Matthew Sergeant (EML)" <Matthew.Sergeant@e...>
• Re: Component Markup Language - From: Nigel Hutchison <nwoh@s...>
• RE: A weaker XSL? - From: peter@w... (Peter Seibel)
• Namespaces does *not* formally introduce "global attributes" - From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• Re: Component Markup Language - From: Robb Shecter <shecter@d...>
• Re: Component Markup Language - From: Robb Shecter <shecter@d...>
• Schema Processing (was Re: Fw: Namespaces) - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Fw: Namespaces - From: "Oren Ben-Kiki" <oren@c...>
• Re: COBOL XML parser? - From: Robb Shecter <shecter@d...>
• RE: Component Markup Language - From: Mark Birbeck <Mark.Birbeck@i...>
• Re: Component Markup Language - From: "Pierre Morel" <pierlou@C...>
• COBOL XML parser? - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Re: Component Markup Language - From: "Frank Boumphrey" <bckman@i...>
• RE: A weaker XSL? - From: Michael.Kay@i...
• RE: Component Markup Language - From: Dave Winer <dave@u...>
• RE: Component Markup Language - From: "Ogan, Arif" <AOgan@u...>
• Re: Component Markup Language - From: "Paul R. Brown" <prb@u...>
• RE: Component Markup Language - From: "Matthew Sergeant (EML)" <Matthew.Sergeant@e...>
• Component Markup Language - From: Robb Shecter <shecter@d...>
• Re: Restricted Namespaces for XML - From: "Don Park" <donpark@q...>
• RE: Restricted Namespaces for XML - From: Ronald Bourret <rbourret@i...>
• Re: Fw: Namespaces - From: James Clark <jjc@j...>
• Fw: Namespaces - From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• Re: Fw: Namespaces - From: james anderson <James.Anderson@m...>
• RE: Namespaces - From: Ronald Bourret <rbourret@i...>
• Re: Restricted Namespaces for XML - From: James Clark <jjc@j...>
• Re: A weaker XSL? - From: "Don Park" <donpark@q...>
• Re: A weaker XSL? - From: Nathan Kurz <nate@v...>
• Fw: Namespaces - From: "Oren Ben-Kiki" <oren@c...>
• A New Hope (was Re: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?)) - From: spreitze@p...
• Re: Restricted Namespaces for XML - From: "Don Park" <donpark@q...>
• Re: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?) - From: matt@v...
• Re: Another errata? - From: Tyler Baker <tyler@i...>
• Re: Control Characters - From: MURATA Makoto <murata@a...>
• A weaker XSL? (Was: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits ) - From: Clark Evans <clark.evans@m...>
• Re: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?) - From: Clark Evans <clark.evans@m...>
• Re: Another errata? - From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Re: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?) - From: Tyler Baker <tyler@i...>
• Re: Fw: Namespaces - From: James Clark <jjc@j...>
• Re: Restricted Namespaces for XML - From: Tyler Baker <tyler@i...>
• Re: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?) - From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• RE: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?) - From: "Borden, Jonathan" <jborden@m...>
• Re: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?) - From: Clark Evans <clark.evans@m...>
• Re: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?) - From: "Mark D. Anderson" <mda@d...>
• Re: What is a good database for very large collections? - From: Marcelo Cantos <marcelo@m...>
• Restricted Namespaces for XML - From: "Don Park" <donpark@q...>
• RE: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?) - From: "Borden, Jonathan" <jborden@m...>
• Re: Since we're talking about databases... - From: len bullard <cbullard@h...>
• XML parsing techniques - From: peter@w... (Peter Seibel)
• RE: Fw: Namespaces - From: Mark Birbeck <Mark.Birbeck@i...>
• 'Strong' status for XML - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Re: Another errata? - From: Tyler Baker <tyler@i...>
• Re: Another errata? - From: Clark Evans <clark.evans@m...>
• Re: What is the purpose of ANY keyword ? - From: Adam M Donahue <amd0978@a...>
• RE: Another errata? - From: Mark Birbeck <Mark.Birbeck@i...>
• Re: Control Characters - From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>
• What is the purpose of ANY keyword ? - From: Shekhar Kshirsagar <skshirsa@n...>
• Re: Another errata? - From: Tyler Baker <tyler@i...>
• Can attribute value be of type ELEMENT ? - From: Shekhar Kshirsagar <skshirsa@n...>
• Control Characters - From: Eric Hellman <eric@h...>
• RE: Fw: Namespaces - From: Mark Birbeck <Mark.Birbeck@i...>
• RE: how to browse xml files with xsl style sheet LOCALLY ? - From: Chris Lovett <clovett@m...>
• What is the purpose of ANY keyword ? - From: Shekhar Kshirsagar <skshirsa@n...>
• RE: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?) - From: Mark Birbeck <Mark.Birbeck@i...>
• RE: Forking the DOM (was Re: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits) - From: "Matthew Sergeant (EML)" <Matthew.Sergeant@e...>
• XML and databases (NYC talk 2/8) - From: "DuCharme, Robert" <DuCharmR@m...>
• Forking the DOM (was Re: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits) - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• RE: Fw: Namespaces - From: Mark Birbeck <Mark.Birbeck@i...>
• Re: Namespaces - From: James Clark <jjc@j...>
• RE: Another errata? - From: Mark Birbeck <Mark.Birbeck@i...>
• Compound Documents as directories stored in zip files - From: David Mohring <heretic@i...>
• Reminder: XML Research Dissemination Workshop 26 February in Edinburgh - From: "Henry S. Thompson" <ht@c...>
• RE: Namespace clashes? - From: Ronald Bourret <rbourret@i...>
• unsubscribe - From: jayadeva@l... (Jayadeva Babu Gali)
• unsubscribe - From: jayadeva@l... (Jayadeva Babu Gali)
• Namespace clashes? - From: Peter Finch <peter@h...>
• RE: object databases - From: Michael.Kay@i...
• Fw: Fw: Namespaces - From: "Oren Ben-Kiki" <oren@c...>
• Re: Fw: Namespaces - From: James Clark <jjc@j...>
• RE: Another errata? - From: Ronald Bourret <rbourret@i...>
• Re: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?) - From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• Re: Interesting Monday. - From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• RE: Interesting Monday. - From: "Matthew Sergeant (EML)" <Matthew.Sergeant@e...>
• RE: Interesting Monday. - From: "Matthew Sergeant (EML)" <Matthew.Sergeant@e...>
• RE: Since we're talking about databases... - From: Ronald Bourret <rbourret@i...>
• Fw: Namespaces - From: "Oren Ben-Kiki" <oren@c...>
• RE: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?) - From: "Borden, Jonathan" <jborden@m...>
• Re: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?) - From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• Re: Interesting Monday. - From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• Re: Namespaces - From: "Don Park" <donpark@q...>
• RE: Interesting Monday. - From: James Robertson <jamesr@s...>
• Stripping leading and trailing spaces??? - From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• RE: Compound Documents - necessary for success? - From: Mark Birbeck <Mark.Birbeck@i...>
• RE: Since we're talking about databases... - From: "Jeffrey E. Sussna" <jes@k...>
• RE: Another errata? - From: Mark Birbeck <Mark.Birbeck@i...>
• RE: Compound Documents - necessary for success? - From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• Re: Since we're talking about databases... - From: len bullard <cbullard@h...>
• RE: Another errata? - From: "Ogievetsky, Nikita" <nikita.ogievetsky@c...>
• RE: 5.3 and Appendix A contradiction [Re: Another errata?] - From: Mark Birbeck <Mark.Birbeck@i...>
• RE: Compound Documents - necessary for success? - From: Chris von See <cvonsee@o...>
• RE: Compositional Documents - From: Derek Denny-Brown <derekdb@m...>
• Re: What is a good database for very large collections? (was Re: XSL/ECMAscript (was RE: Frontier as a scalable XML repository (was Re: Is XML dead already or what?)) - From: Michael Fuller <msf@m...>
• Re: Another errata? - From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>
• RE: Namespaces - From: Andrew Layman <andrewl@m...>
• ANN: ezDTD v1.5 -- DTD Editor/Generator/Formatter - From: fasthand@b...
• RE: Another errata? - From: Mark Birbeck <Mark.Birbeck@i...>
• 5.3 and Appendix A contradiction [Re: Another errata?] - From: james anderson <James.Anderson@m...>
• Re: Compound Documents - necessary for success? - From: james anderson <James.Anderson@m...>
• Stripping leading and trailing spaces??? - From: "Dan Finkelstein" <danf@y...>
• Compositional Documents - From: Chris Berry <CBerry@w...>
• RE: Compound Documents - necessary for success? - From: Mark Birbeck <Mark.Birbeck@i...>
• Re: Since we're talking about databases... - From: Jerome McDonough <jmcdonou@l...>
• how to browse xml files with xsl style sheet LOCALLY ? - From: Mathieu Mangeot Lerebours <Mathieu.Mangeot@x...>
• Re: Is this invalid? - From: "Richard L. Goerwitz" <richard@g...>
• re: Namespaces without a domain name - From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• RE: Compound Documents - necessary for success? - From: Ronald Bourret <rbourret@i...>
• RE: Compound Documents - necessary for success? - From: Chris von See <cvonsee@o...>
• Is this invalid? - From: Richard Tobin <richard@c...>
• Re: Namespaces without a domain name - From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
• Re: Another errata? - From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>
• Re: Another errata? - From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>
• RE: Namespaces without a domain name - From: "Matthew Sergeant (EML)" <Matthew.Sergeant@e...>
• Re: Namespaces without a domain name - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Namespaces without a domain name - From: "Matthew Sergeant (EML)" <Matthew.Sergeant@e...>
• Namespaces - From: James Clark <jjc@j...>
• Re: Since we're talking about databases... - From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• Re: SAX: Next Round (Lexical Event Handler) - From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• RE: Interesting Monday. - From: Rob Schoening <Rschoening@u...>
• RE: Interesting Monday. - From: "Matthew Sergeant (EML)" <Matthew.Sergeant@e...>
• RE: Interesting Monday. - From: "Matthew Sergeant (EML)" <Matthew.Sergeant@e...>
• Re: Another errata? - From: "Don Park" <donpark@q...>
• How XML Just Might Eat the Web Someday (was Re: Interesting Monday.) - From: da <da@c...>
• No Subject - From: Chris Berry <CBerry@w...>
• Re: Since we're talking about databases... - From: "W. Eliot Kimber" <eliot@d...>
• RE: Since we're talking about databases... - From: "Jeffrey E. Sussna" <jes@k...>
• Re: Since we're talking about databases... - From: Clark Evans <clark.evans@m...>
• Re: Since we're talking about databases... - From: "Betty L. Harvey" <harvey@e...>
• Since we're talking about databases... - From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Re: SAX: Next Round (Lexical Event Handler) - From: David Brownell <db@E...>
• RE: Another errata? - From: Mark Birbeck <Mark.Birbeck@i...>
• Re: Interesting Monday. - From: James Robertson <jamesr@s...>
• Re: Frontier as a scalable XML repository (was Re: Is XML dead already or what?) - From: Deke Smith <deke@t...>
• Re: NamespaceFilter and ParserFilter updates - From: "Bill la Forge" <b.laforge@j...>
• Re: NamespaceFilter and ParserFilter updates - From: "Bill la Forge" <b.laforge@j...>
• RE: Another errata? - From: Andrew Layman <andrewl@m...>
• RE: Real world DTD - From: "DuCharme, Robert" <DuCharmR@m...>
• NamespaceFilter and ParserFilter updates - From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>
• Re: Another errata? - From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>
• Re: Another errata? - From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Re: What is a good database for very large collections? (was Re: XSL/ECMAscript (was RE: Frontier as a scalable XML repository (was Re: Is XML dead already or what?)) - From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Re: Interesting Monday. - From: Tyler Baker <tyler@i...>
• Re: Compound Documents - necessary for success? - From: james anderson <James.Anderson@m...>
• Re: What is a good database for very large collections? (was ...) - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• RE: What is a good database for very large collections? - From: "Borden, Jonathan" <jborden@m...>
• SNMP - From: "Merriam, Rudyard" <Rudyard.Merriam@C...>
• Re: Another errata? - From: james anderson <James.Anderson@m...>
• What is a good database for very large collections? (was Re: XSL/ECMAscript (was RE: Frontier as a scalable XML repository (was Re: Is XML dead already or what?)) - From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
• Re: XSL Draft? - From: Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@i...>
• RE: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?) - From: Mark Birbeck <Mark.Birbeck@i...>
• Re: Namespace prefixes in attribute declarations - From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>
• Re: SAX: Next Round (Lexical Event Handler) - From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>
• Namespace prefixes in attribute declarations - From: Ronald Bourret <rbourret@i...>
• RE: Another errata? - From: Ronald Bourret <rbourret@i...>
• RE: Compound Documents - necessary for success? - From: Ronald Bourret <rbourret@i...>
• XSL Draft? - From: parul agarwal <paagarwal@h...>
• RE: Interesting Monday. - From: "Matthew Sergeant (EML)" <Matthew.Sergeant@e...>
• Interesting Monday. - From: "Matthew Sergeant (EML)" <Matthew.Sergeant@e...>
• Re: XML query engines - From: Jani Jaakkola <jjaakkol@c...>
• Re: XML query engines - From: "Bill la Forge" <b.laforge@j...>
• Re: XML query engines - From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Re: XML query engines - From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>
• RE: XML query engines - From: Jarle Stabell <jarle.stabell@d...>