[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: ModSAX (SAX 1.1) Proposal
>The ModHandler class seems particularily useless. It just creates a >completely unnecessary dependency between handler classes and the SAX >package. You could use Object just as well. Two reasons: 1. Using java.lang.Object will make ModSAX Java-dependent. 2. Using ModHandler interface adds some compile-time type-check. Only penalty is increasing the number of interfaces a class implements which does affect the performance during runtime. Very little penalty in most cases. <java_tip> Most Java VM implementations search the interface list back to front so that most often used interface (i.e. org.w3c.dom.Node) should be the last interface in the 'implements' list. </java_tip> Best, Don Park Docuverse xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|