[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Roll-Your-Own Parsers (was: Re: What Clean Specs Achieve)
From: Simon St.Laurent <simonstl@s...> >If we could work with parser layers rather than parsers, this might become >a lot easier to manage. We could just turn on the parts we need and turn >off the ones we don't. We've been continuing our effort to add filters to MDSAX and in the process ran into a small problem--the runtime was loading all the filters specifiec in the context boot document. The next release fixes this, so that only the filters actually being used get loaded. Anyway, the point here is that a reasonable approach to dynamic configuration should give you a very small footprint when only selected features are used. This in contrast to a does-everything monolithic parser. And as the specs mature, it seems likely that the larger companies represented at the W3C have no reason at all to keep the specs small and lightweight--cumbersom specs nicely eliminates much of the competition! So it seems the choice is clear... expect your parsers to grow till they have more features than MS Word, or take a configurable approach which allows the developer to select the capabilities necessary for the job at hand. Bill xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|