[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: ModSAX (SAX 1.1) Proposal
David Megginson wrote: > public interface ModParser extends Parser > { > public abstract void setFeature (String featureID, boolean state) > throws SAXNotSupportedException; > > public abstract void setHandler (String handlerID, ModHandler handler) > throws SAXNotSupportedException; > } Is it obvious that one should throw exceptions on not supported? I believe it in many cases would be more comfortable if it returned a boolean supported or not instead of throwing an exception, as many clients probably want/need to check whether a particular feature is supported or not (and trade off behaviour accordingly) Cheers, Jarle xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|