[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

From XML to Latin Was: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-Fe

• From: Rob Schoening <rschoening@u...>
• To: cowan@l..., xml-dev@i..., jes@k...
• Date: Fri, 19 Feb 1999 14:57:04 -0800

>I think this issue needs to be addressed. It may be the case that the stream
>contains, not one, but many documents, where each information "packet" is a
>document. Or perhaps the afore-mentioned notion of "document fragment" is
>introduced, and each packet is a fragment. But it will definitely be
>necessary to support this kind of processing in some manner. 


It definitely needs to be addressed.

XML would do well to take a long hard look at natural language.  That is,
what are the aspects of natural langauge that allow us to deal with them in
both spoken and written form in a variety of media (on paper, on screen, on
tape, on air, etc...)?

As Jeffrey suggested, we're getting stuck on the markup when markup is only
a small part of the picture.  If that happens we're going to end up with
Latin!  It is formal and precise, but not so terribly useful for
communication.  These days that's a crippling liability.

Does the W3C have a set of use-cases for XML.  I'd be very interested to see
them.

Rob


>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-xml-dev@i... [mailto:owner-xml-dev@i...]On Behalf Of
>John Cowan
>Sent: Friday, February 19, 1999 2:07 PM
>To: XML Dev
>Subject: Re: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999
>
>
>Nathan Kurz wrote:
>
>> And if the stream is continuous (for example, an XML
>> stock ticker) even the concept of a well-formed stream seems tenuous.
>
>It's not clear that XML supports infinitely long streams (where the
>end-tag of the document element is *never* reached).
>
>-- 
>John Cowan	http://www.ccil.org/~cowan		cowan@c...
>	You tollerday donsk?  N.  You tolkatiff scowegian?  Nn.
>	You spigotty anglease?  Nnn.  You phonio saxo?  Nnnn.
>		Clear all so!  'Tis a Jute.... (Finnegans Wake 16.5)
>
>xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
>Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN
>981-02-3594-1
>To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
>(un)subscribe xml-dev
>To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
>subscribe xml-dev-digest
>List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
>
>
>
>xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
>Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN
>981-02-3594-1
>To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
>(un)subscribe xml-dev
>To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
>subscribe xml-dev-digest
>List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
>
>


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999
    • From: "Jeffrey E. Sussna" <jes@k...>

• Prev by Date: RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999
• Next by Date: RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999
• Previous by thread: RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999
• Next by thread: RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread