XML-DEV Mailing List Archive by date - April, 2011

• ANN: Algorithm for Merging a simpleType Dependency Chain
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 30 Apr 2011 22:20:43 -0000
• Re: Why cant xml:id be numeric only ?
  • From John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> on 29 Apr 2011 17:23:46 -0000
• RE: Why cant xml:id be numeric only ?
  • From "David Lee" <dlee@calldei.com> on 29 Apr 2011 14:57:25 -0000
• Re: Why cant xml:id be numeric only ?
  • From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 29 Apr 2011 14:42:35 -0000
• Why cant xml:id be numeric only ?
  • From "David Lee" <dlee@calldei.com> on 29 Apr 2011 14:22:58 -0000
• Re: Whatever happened to the xpointer() scheme?
  • From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 28 Apr 2011 16:05:36 -0000
• Re: When will XERCES have a complete implementation of XML Schema1.1?
  • From Michael Glavassevich <mrglavas@ca.ibm.com> on 28 Apr 2011 15:47:51 -0000
• Whatever happened to the xpointer() scheme?
  • From Tim Mills <tim@xqsharp.com> on 28 Apr 2011 15:30:45 -0000
• Re: RE: XML-vocabulary-specific programming idioms
  • From Stephen D Green <stephengreenubl@gmail.com> on 27 Apr 2011 13:39:26 -0000
• RE: RE: XML-vocabulary-specific programming idioms
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 27 Apr 2011 13:28:44 -0000
• RE: RE: XML-vocabulary-specific programming idioms
  • From "David Lee" <dlee@calldei.com> on 27 Apr 2011 13:22:03 -0000
• RE: RE: XML-vocabulary-specific programming idioms
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 27 Apr 2011 13:03:07 -0000
• RE: RE: XML-vocabulary-specific programming idioms
  • From "David Lee" <dlee@calldei.com> on 27 Apr 2011 12:51:56 -0000
• RE: XML-vocabulary-specific programming idioms
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 27 Apr 2011 12:44:32 -0000
• XML-vocabulary-specific programming idioms
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 27 Apr 2011 10:10:57 -0000
• RE: Strategy for upgrading schemas to XML Schema 1.1?
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 26 Apr 2011 13:16:57 -0000
• Re: Strategy for upgrading schemas to XML Schema 1.1?
  • From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 26 Apr 2011 13:02:23 -0000
• Strategy for upgrading schemas to XML Schema 1.1?
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 26 Apr 2011 12:46:20 -0000
• RE: When will XERCES have a complete implementation ofXML Schema 1.1?
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 26 Apr 2011 12:32:07 -0000
• Re: When will XERCES have a complete implementation ofXML Schema 1.1?
  • From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 26 Apr 2011 11:43:29 -0000
• When will XERCES have a complete implementation of XML Schema 1.1?
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 26 Apr 2011 11:02:16 -0000
• ANN: Portable Data Component -- time interval (start/end orstart/duration)
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 23 Apr 2011 14:36:13 -0000
• RE: Should XML ever be presented to 'users' (Was: Re: ANN: a portable data component -- length)
  • From "Cox, Bruce" <Bruce.Cox@USPTO.GOV> on 21 Apr 2011 18:39:48 -0000
• XML Schema pattern facet quiz
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 20 Apr 2011 12:11:24 -0000
• RE: RE: ANN: Portable Data Component -- start/end
  • From "David Lee" <dlee@calldei.com> on 19 Apr 2011 11:50:06 -0000
• [ANN] Release of XMLmind XML Editor v4.9
  • From Olivier Ishacian <olivier@xmlmind.com> on 19 Apr 2011 10:38:07 -0000
• Re: RE: ANN: Portable Data Component -- start/end
  • From Stephen D Green <stephengreenubl@gmail.com> on 19 Apr 2011 09:58:55 -0000
• Re: RE: ANN: Portable Data Component -- start/end
  • From Stephen D Green <stephengreenubl@gmail.com> on 19 Apr 2011 09:49:16 -0000
• RE: RE: ANN: Portable Data Component -- start/end
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 19 Apr 2011 09:05:31 -0000
• Re: RE: ANN: Portable Data Component -- start/end
  • From Stephen D Green <stephengreenubl@gmail.com> on 19 Apr 2011 06:16:14 -0000
• RE: RE: ANN: Portable Data Component -- start/end
  • From "Toby Considine" <Toby.Considine@gmail.com> on 18 Apr 2011 20:49:39 -0000
• RE: RE: ANN: Portable Data Component -- start/end
  • From "David Lee" <dlee@calldei.com> on 18 Apr 2011 19:27:22 -0000
• RE: ANN: Portable Data Component -- start/end
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 18 Apr 2011 18:18:48 -0000
• Re: ANN: Portable Data Component -- start/end
  • From Stephen D Green <stephengreenubl@gmail.com> on 17 Apr 2011 17:57:48 -0000
• RE: ANN: Portable Data Component -- start/end
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 17 Apr 2011 08:53:53 -0000
• Re: ANN: Portable Data Component -- start/end
  • From Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@gmail.com> on 17 Apr 2011 00:06:29 -0000
• ANN: Portable Data Component -- start/end
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 16 Apr 2011 17:05:04 -0000
• [ANN] Release of XMLmind DITA Converter v2.0.1
  • From Olivier Ishacian <olivier@xmlmind.com> on 15 Apr 2011 07:35:21 -0000
• Re: [ANN] XQSharp 2.1 - XQuery and XSLT 2 for the .NETframework
  • From Oliver Hallam <oliver@xqsharp.com> on 14 Apr 2011 18:05:25 -0000
• Re: [ANN] XQSharp 2.1 - XQuery and XSLT 2 for the .NET framework
  • From Rand McRanderson <therandshow@gmail.com> on 14 Apr 2011 15:52:06 -0000
• Re: [Summary] Portable Data Components
  • From Stephen D Green <stephengreenubl@gmail.com> on 14 Apr 2011 08:14:36 -0000
• Re: [Summary] Portable Data Components
  • From Stephen D Green <stephengreenubl@gmail.com> on 13 Apr 2011 21:07:49 -0000
• Re: ANN: a portable data component -- length
  • From rjelliffe <rjelliffe@allette.com.au> on 13 Apr 2011 08:13:23 -0000
• W3C Community groups?
  • From Dave Pawson <davep@dpawson.co.uk> on 13 Apr 2011 07:47:28 -0000
• Re: [Summary] Portable Data Components
  • From Dave Pawson <davep@dpawson.co.uk> on 12 Apr 2011 14:04:12 -0000
• Re: [Summary] Portable Data Components
  • From Stephen D Green <stephengreenubl@gmail.com> on 12 Apr 2011 13:03:49 -0000
• RE: [Summary] Portable Data Components
  • From "David Lee" <dlee@calldei.com> on 12 Apr 2011 10:43:42 -0000
• Re: [Summary] Portable Data Components
  • From Stephen D Green <stephengreenubl@gmail.com> on 12 Apr 2011 06:33:06 -0000
• [ANN] XQSharp 2.1 - XQuery and XSLT 2 for the .NET framework
  • From Oliver Hallam <oliver@xqsharp.com> on 11 Apr 2011 17:01:52 -0000
• Re: Service Constraints
  • From John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> on 11 Apr 2011 15:08:41 -0000
• Re: ANN: a portable data component -- length
  • From Stephen D Green <stephengreenubl@gmail.com> on 11 Apr 2011 09:49:02 -0000
• Re: ANN: a portable data component -- length
  • From Stephen D Green <stephengreenubl@gmail.com> on 11 Apr 2011 09:29:33 -0000
• Re: Service Constraints
  • From Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@gmail.com> on 11 Apr 2011 09:23:44 -0000
• [ANN] Relax NG validation tool Serene 0.5.2 released
  • From Radu Cernuta <radu.cernuta@gmail.com> on 11 Apr 2011 09:23:26 -0000
• Re: ANN: a portable data component -- length
  • From David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk> on 11 Apr 2011 09:21:32 -0000
• Re: ANN: a portable data component -- length
  • From Stephen D Green <stephengreenubl@gmail.com> on 11 Apr 2011 09:18:51 -0000
• Re: ANN: a portable data component -- length
  • From Stephen D Green <stephengreenubl@gmail.com> on 11 Apr 2011 09:04:46 -0000
• Re: ANN: a portable data component -- length
  • From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 11 Apr 2011 08:26:06 -0000
• [Summary] Portable Data Components
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 10 Apr 2011 13:25:02 -0000
• RE: ANN: a portable data component -- length
  • From "Toby Considine" <Toby.Considine@gmail.com> on 10 Apr 2011 05:23:22 -0000
• Re: ANN: a portable data component -- length
  • From Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org> on 10 Apr 2011 04:42:27 -0000
• Re: Should XML ever be presented to 'users' (Was: Re: ANN: a portable data component -- length)
  • From Bill Kearney <wkearney99@hotmail.com> on 10 Apr 2011 03:04:26 -0000
• Re: Should XML ever be presented to 'users' (Was: Re: ANN: a portable data component -- length)
  • From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com> on 10 Apr 2011 00:32:04 -0000
• RE: ANN: a portable data component -- length
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 9 Apr 2011 22:40:52 -0000
• Re: ANN: a portable data component -- length
  • From Kurt Cagle <kurt.cagle@gmail.com> on 9 Apr 2011 20:40:40 -0000
• Re: ANN: a portable data component -- length
  • From John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> on 9 Apr 2011 19:57:54 -0000
• Re: ANN: a portable data component -- length
  • From John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> on 9 Apr 2011 19:55:59 -0000
• Re: ANN: a portable data component -- length
  • From Frank Manola <fmanola@acm.org> on 9 Apr 2011 18:46:42 -0000
• Re: ANN: a portable data component -- length
  • From Stephen D Green <stephengreenubl@gmail.com> on 9 Apr 2011 18:23:34 -0000
• Should XML ever be presented to 'users' (Was: Re: ANN: a portable data component -- length)
  • From "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@codalogic.com> on 9 Apr 2011 18:10:03 -0000
• Re: ANN: a portable data component -- length
  • From Amelia A Lewis <amyzing@talsever.com> on 9 Apr 2011 17:59:51 -0000
• Re: ANN: a portable data component -- length
  • From Frank Manola <fmanola@acm.org> on 9 Apr 2011 17:59:01 -0000
• Re: ANN: a portable data component -- length
  • From "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@codalogic.com> on 9 Apr 2011 17:45:15 -0000
• Re: ANN: a portable data component -- length
  • From Stephen D Green <stephengreenubl@gmail.com> on 9 Apr 2011 17:39:47 -0000
• Re: ANN: a portable data component -- length
  • From Frank Manola <fmanola@acm.org> on 9 Apr 2011 17:35:21 -0000
• Re: ANN: a portable data component -- length
  • From Amelia A Lewis <amyzing@talsever.com> on 9 Apr 2011 17:15:30 -0000
• Fwd: ANN: a portable data component -- length
  • From Stephen D Green <stephengreenubl@gmail.com> on 9 Apr 2011 17:06:41 -0000
• RE: ANN: a portable data component -- length
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 9 Apr 2011 16:26:07 -0000
• Re: ANN: a portable data component -- length
  • From Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org> on 9 Apr 2011 16:01:36 -0000
• ANN: a portable data component -- length
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 9 Apr 2011 15:10:50 -0000
• [announcement] XForms course 16-17 June 2011, San Carlos, California
  • From "C. M. Sperberg-McQueen" <cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com> on 9 Apr 2011 14:53:16 -0000
• analysis of temporal XML data -- research ideas
  • From "Johannes.Lichtenberger" <Johannes.Lichtenberger@uni-konstanz.de> on 9 Apr 2011 11:15:59 -0000
• Re: Service Constraints
  • From Stephen D Green <stephengreenubl@gmail.com> on 9 Apr 2011 09:34:50 -0000
• Re: [October, 2006] Tim Berners-Lee: the attempt to get the world to switch to XML ... didn't work
  • From Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@rbii.com> on 9 Apr 2011 04:24:10 -0000
• Re: [October, 2006] Tim Berners-Lee: the attempt to get the world to switch to XML ... didn't work
  • From Jim Melton <jim.melton@oracle.com> on 9 Apr 2011 00:08:15 -0000
• Re: Service Constraints
  • From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 8 Apr 2011 23:07:48 -0000
• Re: Service Constraints
  • From "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com> on 8 Apr 2011 22:54:56 -0000
• Service Constraints
  • From Fraser Goffin <goffinf@gmail.com> on 8 Apr 2011 22:17:56 -0000
• Re: [October, 2006] Tim Berners-Lee: the attempt to getthe world to switch to XML ... didn't work
  • From cbullard@hiwaay.net on 8 Apr 2011 21:03:10 -0000
• Re: [October, 2006] Tim Berners-Lee: the attempt to getthe world to switch to XML ... didn't work
  • From Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org> on 8 Apr 2011 15:51:12 -0000
• Re: [October, 2006] Tim Berners-Lee: the attempt to getthe world to switch to XML ... didn't work
  • From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com> on 8 Apr 2011 12:50:56 -0000
• Re: [October, 2006] Tim Berners-Lee: the attempt to get theworld to switch to XML ... didn't work
  • From Stephen D Green <stephengreenubl@gmail.com> on 8 Apr 2011 11:54:03 -0000
• [October, 2006] Tim Berners-Lee: the attempt to get the world toswitch to XML ... didn't work
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 8 Apr 2011 11:47:24 -0000
• Re: What is the equivalent functional programming function(s)for hopping from element to element via XML "IDREF" references (or XSD "base"references)
  • From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 7 Apr 2011 14:49:12 -0000
• Re: What is the equivalent functional programming function(s) forhopping from element to element via XML "IDREF" references (or XSD "base" references)
  • From Richard Salz <rsalz@us.ibm.com> on 7 Apr 2011 14:26:56 -0000
• Re: What is the equivalent functional programming function(s)for hopping from element to element via XML "IDREF" references (or XSD "base"references)
  • From David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk> on 7 Apr 2011 14:24:36 -0000
• What is the equivalent functional programming function(s) forhopping from element to element via XML "IDREF" references (or XSD "base"references)
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 7 Apr 2011 13:56:40 -0000
• [ANN] Balisage papers due on Friday
  • From Tommie Usdin <btusdin@mulberrytech.com> on 5 Apr 2011 20:10:07 -0000
• Re: XML Schemas is Cool
  • From Stephen D Green <stephengreenubl@gmail.com> on 5 Apr 2011 15:02:35 -0000
• Re: XML Schemas is Cool
  • From John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> on 5 Apr 2011 15:02:05 -0000
• Re: XML Schemas is Cool
  • From David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk> on 5 Apr 2011 14:51:33 -0000
• Re: XML Schemas is Cool
  • From Richard Salz <rsalz@us.ibm.com> on 5 Apr 2011 14:42:40 -0000
• W3C docs, for the user
  • From Dave Pawson <davep@dpawson.co.uk> on 5 Apr 2011 14:10:00 -0000
• XML Schemas is Cool
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 5 Apr 2011 11:50:05 -0000
• Re: Correct usage of the terms "bind", "binding", "bound", "in"?
  • From ht@inf.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson) on 4 Apr 2011 12:57:17 -0000
• Re: Correct usage of the terms "bind", "binding", "bound","in"?
  • From David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk> on 4 Apr 2011 10:16:48 -0000
• Correct usage of the terms "bind", "binding", "bound", "in"?
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 4 Apr 2011 10:01:05 -0000
• RE: RE: Portable Constraints
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 3 Apr 2011 22:27:53 -0000
• Re: RE: Portable Constraints
  • From Stephen D Green <stephengreenubl@gmail.com> on 3 Apr 2011 18:00:00 -0000
• Re: RE: Portable Constraints
  • From Stephen D Green <stephengreenubl@gmail.com> on 3 Apr 2011 17:15:29 -0000
• Re: What is the correct terminology for an element andits namespace?
  • From David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk> on 3 Apr 2011 14:36:47 -0000
• RE: What is the correct terminology for an element andits namespace?
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 3 Apr 2011 14:05:45 -0000
• RE: Portable Constraints
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 2 Apr 2011 14:42:17 -0000
• Re: Portable Constraints
  • From Stephen D Green <stephengreenubl@gmail.com> on 2 Apr 2011 10:03:39 -0000
• Re: Portable Constraints
  • From Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@gmail.com> on 2 Apr 2011 08:12:49 -0000