XML-DEV Mailing List Archive by thread - March, 2008

• [Announce] XQuery Training Event, From "Stylus Studio" <stylusstudio@g...> on 3 Mar 2008 19:17:32 -0000
• Early-Bird Discount Expires Soon for the Open Standards Symposium, From "Jane Harnad" <jane.harnad@o...> on 3 Mar 2008 21:16:34 -0000
• New Release of Yax - a Java XProc (XML Pipeline) Implementation: First Maven based Release, From <joerg.moebius@h...> on 4 Mar 2008 13:00:24 -0000
• "Maximize the ratio of content to markup" What's the underlying principle?, From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...> on 5 Mar 2008 12:02:04 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • RE: "Maximize the ratio of content to markup" What's the underlying principle?, From "Meadows, Philip" <Phil.Meadows@s...> on 5 Mar 2008 12:05:55 -0000
  • RE: "Maximize the ratio of content to markup" What's the underlying principle?, From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 5 Mar 2008 12:39:46 -0000
  • Re: "Maximize the ratio of content to markup" What's the underlying principle?, From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...> on 5 Mar 2008 12:41:04 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: "Maximize the ratio of content to markup" What's the underlying principle?, From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...> on 5 Mar 2008 12:42:39 -0000
  • Re: "Maximize the ratio of content to markup" What's the underlying principle?, From David Carlisle <davidc@n...> on 5 Mar 2008 12:49:36 -0000
• consuming XML document in web service, From "Robert Hoenig" <rhoenig@h...> on 5 Mar 2008 17:37:36 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: consuming XML document in web service, From "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@c...> on 6 Mar 2008 10:27:16 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: consuming XML document in web service, From Michael Champion <mc@x...> on 6 Mar 2008 14:39:03 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • RE: consuming XML document in web service, From "Robert Hoenig" <rhoenig@h...> on 6 Mar 2008 14:44:51 -0000
• [ANN] EditiX XML Editor 2008 - Service Pack 1, From "Alexandre Brillant" <abrillant@j...> on 7 Mar 2008 14:03:25 -0000
• Can Searchbots Find Web Pages That Aren't Linked To?, From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...> on 9 Mar 2008 11:45:21 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: Can Searchbots Find Web Pages That Aren't Linked To?, From "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@c...> on 9 Mar 2008 12:20:47 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: Can Searchbots Find Web Pages That Aren't Linked To?, From "Manfred Staudinger" <manfred.staudinger@g...> on 9 Mar 2008 14:37:55 -0000
  • Re: Can Searchbots Find Web Pages That Aren't Linked To?, From Liam Quin <liam@w...> on 9 Mar 2008 23:58:34 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: Can Searchbots Find Web Pages That Aren't Linked To?, From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...> on 10 Mar 2008 07:43:57 -0000
  • Re: Can Searchbots Find Web Pages That Aren't Linked To?, From "Ken North" <kennorth@s...> on 10 Mar 2008 02:08:26 -0000
• "XML is just syntax" versus "Use semantic markup" (Is this a paradox?), From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...> on 9 Mar 2008 12:49:14 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: "XML is just syntax" versus "Use semantic markup" (Is this a paradox?), From "Fraser Goffin" <goffinf@g...> on 9 Mar 2008 13:04:31 -0000
  • Re: "XML is just syntax" versus "Use semantic markup" (Is this a paradox?), From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...> on 9 Mar 2008 14:37:23 -0000
  • Re: "XML is just syntax" versus "Use semantic markup" (Is this a paradox?), From "Mukul Gandhi" <gandhi.mukul@g...> on 9 Mar 2008 17:38:06 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: "XML is just syntax" versus "Use semantic markup" (Is this a paradox?), From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...> on 9 Mar 2008 20:38:24 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: "XML is just syntax" versus "Use semantic markup" (Is this a paradox?), From "Mukul Gandhi" <gandhi.mukul@g...> on 10 Mar 2008 17:02:33 -0000
  • RE: "XML is just syntax" versus "Use semantic markup" (Is this a paradox?), From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 10 Mar 2008 18:41:45 -0000
  • RE: "XML is just syntax" versus "Use semantic markup" (Is this aparadox?), From Richard Salz <rsalz@u...> on 10 Mar 2008 18:58:24 -0000
  • RE: "XML is just syntax" versus "Use semantic markup" (Is this a paradox?), From "Xia Li" <xli@g...> on 10 Mar 2008 17:58:52 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: "XML is just syntax" versus "Use semantic markup" (Is this a paradox?), From "Mukul Gandhi" <gandhi.mukul@g...> on 10 Mar 2008 18:10:10 -0000
  • RE: "XML is just syntax" versus "Use semantic markup" (Is this a paradox?), From "Xia Li" <xli@g...> on 10 Mar 2008 18:22:39 -0000
  • Re: "XML is just syntax" versus "Use semantic markup" (Isthis a paradox?), From Elliotte Harold <elharo@m...> on 11 Mar 2008 03:31:16 -0000
  • Re: "XML is just syntax" versus "Use semantic markup" (Is this a paradox?), From Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@a...> on 10 Mar 2008 06:46:31 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: "XML is just syntax" versus "Use semantic markup" (Is this a paradox?), From "James Fuller" <james.fuller.2007@g...> on 10 Mar 2008 07:38:30 -0000
  • RE: "XML is just syntax" versus "Use semantic markup" (Is this a paradox?), From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 10 Mar 2008 10:05:08 -0000
  • RE: "XML is just syntax" versus "Use semantic markup" (Is this a paradox?), From "Xia Li" <xli@g...> on 10 Mar 2008 18:20:11 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: "XML is just syntax" versus "Use semantic markup" (Is this a paradox?), From "Dimitri Glazkov" <dimitri.glazkov@g...> on 10 Mar 2008 18:48:09 -0000
• DataServices World Call for Speakers Closes March 15, From "Ken North" <kennorth@s...> on 10 Mar 2008 02:12:43 -0000
• Re: =?utf-8?Q?=22XML?= is just =?utf-8?Q?syntax=22?= versus =?utf-8?Q?=22Use?= semantic =?utf-8?Q?markup=22?= (Is this a paradox?), From mike@a... on 10 Mar 2008 19:17:56 -0000
• RE: "XML is just syntax" versus "Use semantic markup" (Is this a paradox?), From Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...> on 10 Mar 2008 20:24:25 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  Followups by subject
  
  • RE: "XML is just syntax" versus "Use semantic markup" (Is this a paradox?), From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...> on 11 Mar 2008 13:17:27 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: "XML is just syntax" versus "Use semantic markup" (Is this a paradox?), From "W. E. Perry" <wperry@f...> on 11 Mar 2008 14:49:06 -0000
• RE: "XML is just syntax" versus "Use semantic markup" (Is this a paradox?), From Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...> on 11 Mar 2008 17:03:10 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: "XML is just syntax" versus "Use semantic markup" (Is this a paradox?), From "W. E. Perry" <wperry@f...> on 11 Mar 2008 16:53:18 -0000
  Followups by subject
  
  • RE: "XML is just syntax" versus "Use semantic markup" (Is this a paradox?), From Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...> on 13 Mar 2008 19:03:14 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: "XML is just syntax" versus "Use semantic markup" (Is this a paradox?), From Steve Newcomb <srn@c...> on 16 Mar 2008 16:54:10 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • RE: "XML is just syntax" versus "Use semantic markup" ( Is this a paradox?), From "Len" <cbullard@h...> on 16 Mar 2008 17:27:32 -0000
  • Re: "XML is just syntax" versus "Use semantic markup" (Is this a paradox?), From Steve Newcomb <srn@c...> on 16 Mar 2008 20:42:12 -0000
  • Re: "XML is just syntax" versus "Use semantic markup" ( Is this a paradox?), From "James Fuller" <james.fuller.2007@g...> on 17 Mar 2008 06:37:59 -0000
  • RE: "XML is just syntax" versus "Use semantic markup" ( Is this a paradox?), From "Len" <cbullard@h...> on 18 Mar 2008 03:19:25 -0000
• RE: "XML is just syntax" versus "Use semantic markup" (Is this a paradox?), From Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...> on 11 Mar 2008 18:24:23 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • RE: "XML is just syntax" versus "Use semantic markup" (Is this a paradox?), From Robin Cover <robin@o...> on 11 Mar 2008 18:46:57 -0000
  • RE: "XML is just syntax" versus "Use semantic markup" (Is this a paradox?), From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 11 Mar 2008 19:07:54 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: "XML is just syntax" versus "Use semantic markup" (Is this a paradox?), From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...> on 11 Mar 2008 19:35:10 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: "XML is just syntax" versus "Use semantic markup" (Is this a paradox?), From "W. E. Perry" <wperry@f...> on 12 Mar 2008 23:03:31 -0000
  Followups by subject
  
  • RE: "XML is just syntax" versus "Use semantic markup" (Is this a paradox?), From Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...> on 11 Mar 2008 19:32:55 -0000
• RE: "XML is just syntax" versus "Use semantic markup" ( Is this a paradox?), From Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...> on 11 Mar 2008 19:49:29 -0000
• Objects at REST..., From "Andrzej Jan Taramina" <andrzej@c...> on 12 Mar 2008 11:29:02 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: [rest-discuss] Objects at REST..., From "Alexander Johannesen" <alexander.johannesen@g...> on 12 Mar 2008 12:54:15 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: [rest-discuss] Objects at REST..., From "Andrzej Jan Taramina" <andrzej@c...> on 12 Mar 2008 20:43:44 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: [rest-discuss] Objects at REST..., From "Alexander Johannesen" <alexander.johannesen@g...> on 13 Mar 2008 11:17:47 -0000
  • RE: Re: [rest-discuss] Objects at REST..., From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 13 Mar 2008 11:53:31 -0000
  • Re: Re: [rest-discuss] Objects at REST..., From "Peter Hunsberger" <peter.hunsberger@g...> on 13 Mar 2008 14:31:49 -0000
  • RE: Objects at REST..., From "Andrzej Jan Taramina" <andrzej@c...> on 14 Mar 2008 13:13:44 -0000
  • Message not availableFollowups by message-id references
    
    • Re: [rest-discuss] Objects at REST..., From "Andrzej Jan Taramina" <andrzej@c...> on 12 Mar 2008 21:12:53 -0000
    • Re: [rest-discuss] Objects at REST..., From Steve Bjorg <steveb@m...> on 13 Mar 2008 12:53:07 -0000
  • Re: Objects at REST..., From "Peter Hunsberger" <peter.hunsberger@g...> on 12 Mar 2008 14:30:16 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: Objects at REST..., From "Andrzej Jan Taramina" <andrzej@c...> on 12 Mar 2008 21:34:20 -0000
  • Re: Objects at REST..., From Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@a...> on 13 Mar 2008 09:14:48 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: Objects at REST..., From "Peter Hunsberger" <peter.hunsberger@g...> on 13 Mar 2008 14:59:52 -0000
  • Re: Objects at REST..., From Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@a...> on 13 Mar 2008 14:55:42 -0000
  • Re: [rest-discuss] Objects at REST..., From Elliotte Harold <elharo@m...> on 12 Mar 2008 16:12:18 -0000
  • Re: [rest-discuss] Objects at REST..., From "Mark Baker" <distobj@a...> on 12 Mar 2008 21:03:06 -0000
  • Message not availableFollowups by message-id references
    
    • Re: [rest-discuss] Objects at REST..., From "Andrzej Jan Taramina" <andrzej@c...> on 12 Mar 2008 21:18:04 -0000
  • Message not availableFollowups by message-id references
    
    • Re: [rest-discuss] Objects at REST..., From "Andrzej Jan Taramina" <andrzej@c...> on 12 Mar 2008 21:27:37 -0000
  • Re: Objects at REST..., From Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@a...> on 13 Mar 2008 08:37:58 -0000
• RE: Objects at REST..., From Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...> on 12 Mar 2008 17:27:52 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: Objects at REST..., From "Peter Hunsberger" <peter.hunsberger@g...> on 12 Mar 2008 20:17:19 -0000
• should this be well-formed?, From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...> on 13 Mar 2008 09:05:40 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: should this be well-formed?, From John Snelson <john.snelson@o...> on 13 Mar 2008 10:51:56 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: should this be well-formed?, From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...> on 13 Mar 2008 11:45:50 -0000
  • Re: should this be well-formed?, From "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@c...> on 13 Mar 2008 12:24:21 -0000
  • Re: should this be well-formed?, From Jirka Kosek <jirka@k...> on 13 Mar 2008 12:32:53 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: should this be well-formed?, From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...> on 13 Mar 2008 13:03:38 -0000
• Summer of Code at the FLWOR foundation, From "William Candillon" <wcandillon@g...> on 13 Mar 2008 12:18:46 -0000
• Beyond Tagged to "Spatial" Syntax, From Stephen Beller <sbeller@n...> on 13 Mar 2008 16:41:09 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  Followups by subject
  
  • RE: Beyond Tagged to "Spatial" Syntax, From Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...> on 13 Mar 2008 18:24:00 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • RE: Beyond Tagged to "Spatial" Syntax, From Stephen Beller <sbeller@n...> on 13 Mar 2008 19:29:55 -0000
  • RE: Beyond Tagged to "Spatial" Syntax, From Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...> on 13 Mar 2008 20:51:28 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • RE: Beyond Tagged to "Spatial" Syntax, From Stephen Beller <sbeller@n...> on 13 Mar 2008 21:12:39 -0000
• RE: Re: [rest-discuss] Objects at REST..., From Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...> on 13 Mar 2008 18:15:27 -0000
• Announcement: XML API Distance Course at University Level, From Jonas Mellin <jonas.mellin@h...> on 16 Mar 2008 01:12:26 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: Announcement: XML API Distance Course at University Level, From Greg Stasko <gstasko@m...> on 16 Mar 2008 02:00:18 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: Announcement: XML API Distance Course at UniversityLevel, From Jonas Mellin <jonas.mellin@h...> on 16 Mar 2008 08:47:35 -0000
• Were these derived from a logical data model: XSLT, XML Schema, XHTML, Schematron?, From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...> on 16 Mar 2008 11:51:44 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: Were these derived from a logical data model: XSLT, XML Schema, XHTML, Schematron?, From Liam Quin <liam@w...> on 16 Mar 2008 15:26:13 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • RE: Were these derived from a logical data model: XSLT, XML Schema, XHTML, Schematron?, From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...> on 16 Mar 2008 16:43:36 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • RE: Were these derived from a logical data model: XSLT, XML Schema, XHTML, Schematron?, From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 16 Mar 2008 19:07:25 -0000
  • RE: Were these derived from a logical data model: XSLT, XML Schema, XHTML, Schematron?, From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 16 Mar 2008 16:59:40 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: Were these derived from a logical data model: XSLT, XML Schema, XHTML, Schematron?, From 'Liam Quin' <liam@w...> on 16 Mar 2008 19:47:04 -0000
  • Re: Were these derived from a logical data model: XSLT, XML Schema, XHTML, Schematron?, From ht@i... (Henry S. Thompson) on 20 Mar 2008 10:54:07 -0000
• RE: "XML is just syntax" versus "Use semantic markup" ( Is this a paradox?), From Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...> on 17 Mar 2008 15:51:51 -0000
• Call for Speaker(s) on Microformats/Semantic Web for Open Web 2008 Vancouver Conf @ Apr/14+15, From "Gerald Bauer" <geraldbauer2007@g...> on 18 Mar 2008 01:40:46 -0000
• Balisage papers due in ONE MONTH!, From B Tommie Usdin <btusdin@m...> on 18 Mar 2008 15:38:06 -0000
• [xml-dev Announcement]: XPontus XML Editor 1.0.0.1, From "Yves Zoundi" <yveszoundi@g...> on 19 Mar 2008 00:55:05 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Message not availableFollowups by message-id references
    
    • Re: [xml-dev Announcement]: XPontus XML Editor 1.0.0.1, From "Ruben Trancoso" <rubentrancoso@g...> on 19 Mar 2008 01:49:46 -0000
• datatype aware schematron with xslt2 query binding issue, From Paul Hermans <paul.hermans@a...> on 19 Mar 2008 14:42:37 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: datatype aware schematron with xslt2 query binding issue, From David Carlisle <davidc@n...> on 19 Mar 2008 14:56:52 -0000
• [ANN] Fast XML Pull Parser 0.3 released, From John Snelson <john.snelson@o...> on 21 Mar 2008 00:22:31 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: [ANN] Fast XML Pull Parser 0.3 released, From Fabrice Desré - France Telecom DR&D/MAPS/AMS <fabrice.desre@o...> on 21 Mar 2008 08:17:19 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: [ANN] Fast XML Pull Parser 0.3 released, From John Snelson <john.snelson@o...> on 21 Mar 2008 09:11:06 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • RE: [ANN] Fast XML Pull Parser 0.3 released, From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 21 Mar 2008 09:53:00 -0000
  • Re: [ANN] Fast XML Pull Parser 0.3 released, From John Snelson <john.snelson@o...> on 21 Mar 2008 09:57:36 -0000
  • Re: [ANN] Fast XML Pull Parser 0.3 released, From richard@i... (Richard Tobin) on 21 Mar 2008 09:53:33 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: [ANN] Fast XML Pull Parser 0.3 released, From John Snelson <john.snelson@o...> on 21 Mar 2008 11:03:45 -0000
• xml.com, From Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@r...> on 25 Mar 2008 20:31:39 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: xml.com, From "W. E. Perry" <wperry@f...> on 25 Mar 2008 20:52:08 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: xml.com, From "Kurt Cagle" <kurt.cagle@g...> on 25 Mar 2008 22:46:19 -0000
• XML Schema Design: no local elements with anonymous types, From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...> on 26 Mar 2008 11:17:32 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: XML Schema Design: no local elements with anonymous types, From "Andrew Welch" <andrew.j.welch@g...> on 26 Mar 2008 12:05:21 -0000
  • Re: XML Schema Design: no local elements with anonymous types, From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...> on 26 Mar 2008 12:21:49 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • RE: XML Schema Design: no local elements with anonymous types, From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 26 Mar 2008 13:41:34 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: XML Schema Design: no local elements with anonymous types, From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...> on 26 Mar 2008 14:06:27 -0000
  • Re: XML Schema Design: no local elements with anonymoustypes, From Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@r...> on 26 Mar 2008 15:25:00 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • RE: XML Schema Design: no local elements with anonymous types, From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 26 Mar 2008 22:47:41 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: XML Schema Design: no local elements with anonymoustypes, From Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@r...> on 27 Mar 2008 15:36:03 -0000
  • RE: XML Schema Design: no local elements with anonymous types, From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 27 Mar 2008 16:06:59 -0000
• [ANN] Apache FOP 0.95beta Released, From Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@r...> on 26 Mar 2008 13:33:38 -0000
• [ANN] XSL-FO 2.0 requirements published, From Liam Quin <liam@w...> on 28 Mar 2008 01:28:58 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: [ANN] XSL-FO 2.0 requirements published, From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...> on 28 Mar 2008 06:01:26 -0000
• XML Pipelines list?, From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...> on 28 Mar 2008 07:32:59 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: XML Pipelines list?, From ht@i... (Henry S. Thompson) on 28 Mar 2008 10:38:15 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: XML Pipelines list?, From Steve Ball <Steve.Ball@e...> on 28 Mar 2008 22:56:53 -0000
• CFP: RuleML-2008 (2008 International RuleML Symposium on Rule Interchangeand Applications), From Adrian Paschke <paschke@i...> on 28 Mar 2008 14:19:45 -0000
• Best Practice for adding a "standard data item" to pre-existing XML vocabularies?, From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...> on 28 Mar 2008 15:24:26 -0000
• [ANN] FoX_4.0 - Fully validating XML toolkit for Fortran, From Toby White <tow@u...> on 28 Mar 2008 17:15:01 -0000
• Does a XSD schema define the minimum or maximum structure of an XML doc?, From "Ben Stover" <bxstover@y...> on 31 Mar 2008 18:27:06 -0000
  Followups by message-id references
  
  • Re: Does a XSD schema define the minimum or maximum structure of an XML doc?, From "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@c...> on 31 Mar 2008 21:48:26 -0000
• Re: Best Practice for adding a "standard data item" to pre-existingXML vocabularies?, From Marcus Carr <mcarr@a...> on 1 Apr 2008 01:46:35 -0000