[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: should this be well-formed?

• From: "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...>
• To: "John Snelson" <john.snelson@o...>
• Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 12:45:38 +0100

I agree it's not well formed, but I'm not having a problem with it.
This one is, when processed by my application, performing fine.

The one that the application is having a problem is this one, which I
figure is well-formed:

<= Recv data, 565 bytes (0x235)
0000: 3c 3f 78 6d 6c 20 76 65 72 73 69 6f 6e 3d 22 31 <?xml version="1
0010: 2e 30 22 20 65 6e 63 6f 64 69 6e 67 3d 22 55 54 .0" encoding="UT
0020: 46 2d 38 22 3f 3e 0a 3c 6b 6d 6c 20 78 6d 6c 6e F-8"?>.<kml xmln
0030: 73 3d 22 68 74 74 70 3a 2f 2f 65 61 72 74 68 2e s="http://earth.
0040: 67 6f 6f 67 6c 65 2e 63 6f 6d 2f 6b 6d 6c 2f 32 google.com/kml/2
0050: 2e 31 22 3e 0a 3c 44 6f 63 75 6d 65 6e 74 3e 0a .1">.<Document>.
0060: 20 20 3c 6e 61 6d 65 3e 4e c3 a6 72 75 6d 3c 2f   <name>N..rum</
0070: 6e 61 6d 65 3e 0a 20 20 3c 64 65 73 63 72 69 70 name>.  <descrip
0080: 74 69 6f 6e 3e 3c 21 5b 43 44 41 54 41 5b 5d 5d tion><![CDATA[]]
0090: 3e 3c 2f 64 65 73 63 72 69 70 74 69 6f 6e 3e 0a ></description>.
00a0: 20 20 3c 53 74 79 6c 65 20 69 64 3d 22 73 74 79   <Style id="sty
00b0: 6c 65 31 22 3e 0a 20 20 20 20 3c 49 63 6f 6e 53 le1">.    <IconS
00c0: 74 79 6c 65 3e 0a 20 20 20 20 20 20 3c 49 63 6f tyle>.      <Ico
00d0: 6e 3e 0a 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 3c 68 72 65 66 n>.        <href
00e0: 3e 68 74 74 70 3a 2f 2f 6d 61 70 73 2e 67 6f 6f >http://maps.goo
00f0: 67 6c 65 2e 63 6f 6d 2f 6d 61 70 66 69 6c 65 73 gle.com/mapfiles
0100: 2f 6d 73 2f 6d 69 63 6f 6e 73 2f 62 6c 75 65 2d /ms/micons/blue-
0110: 64 6f 74 2e 70 6e 67 3c 2f 68 72 65 66 3e 0a 20 dot.png</href>.
0120: 20 20 20 20 20 3c 2f 49 63 6f 6e 3e 0a 20 20 20      </Icon>.
0130: 20 3c 2f 49 63 6f 6e 53 74 79 6c 65 3e 0a 20 20  </IconStyle>.
0140: 3c 2f 53 74 79 6c 65 3e 0a 20 20 3c 50 6c 61 63 </Style>.  <Plac
0150: 65 6d 61 72 6b 3e 0a 20 20 20 20 3c 6e 61 6d 65 emark>.    <name
0160: 3e 4e c3 a6 72 75 6d 3c 2f 6e 61 6d 65 3e 0a 20 >N..rum</name>.
0170: 20 20 20 3c 64 65 73 63 72 69 70 74 69 6f 6e 3e    <description>
0180: 3c 21 5b 43 44 41 54 41 5b 5d 5d 3e 3c 2f 64 65 <![CDATA[]]></de
0190: 73 63 72 69 70 74 69 6f 6e 3e 0a 20 20 20 20 3c scription>.    <
01a0: 73 74 79 6c 65 55 72 6c 3e 23 73 74 79 6c 65 31 styleUrl>#style1
01b0: 3c 2f 73 74 79 6c 65 55 72 6c 3e 0a 20 20 20 20 </styleUrl>.
01c0: 3c 50 6f 69 6e 74 3e 0a 20 20 20 20 20 20 3c 63 <Point>.      <c
01d0: 6f 6f 72 64 69 6e 61 74 65 73 3e 31 32 2e 35 33 oordinates>12.53
01e0: 37 37 31 38 2c 35 35 2e 38 31 36 33 33 30 2c 30 7718,55.816330,0
01f0: 2e 30 30 30 30 30 30 3c 2f 63 6f 6f 72 64 69 6e .000000</coordin
0200: 61 74 65 73 3e 0a 20 20 20 20 3c 2f 50 6f 69 6e ates>.    </Poin
0210: 74 3e 0a 20 20 3c 2f 50 6c 61 63 65 6d 61 72 6b t>.  </Placemark
0220: 3e 0a 3c 2f 44 6f 63 75 6d 65 6e 74 3e 0a 3c 2f >.</Document>.</
0230: 6b 6d 6c 3e 0a                                  kml>.
== Info: Closing connection #0

so I took one that was an example of something working and thought:
why the hell is this thing working. it shouldn't be, it's got the
little extra character on top that should raise an error. Of course
that's a side issue since I still haven't figured out why the second
example isn't working, which is some sort of issue regarding proxy
server setup. Anyway, just wanted confirmed that what was working
shouldn't be, as I'm generally used to things that I think are
supposed to be working not doing so rather than the other way around
and the switch was somewhat of a bewildering experience.





Cheers,
Bryan Rasmussen



On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 11:50 AM, John Snelson <john.snelson@o...> wrote:
> Hi Bryan,
>
>  That's not well formed - the first error you should get is because there
>  is non-whitespace text content outside the document element.
>
>  The next error is that there is a processing instruction that uses the
>  reserved name "xml" - it doesn't count as an XML declaration unless the
>  "<" is the first character in the file.
>
>  John
>
>
>
>  bryan rasmussen wrote:
>  > Should the following response to a GET be well-formed:
>  >
>  > <= Recv data, 423 bytes (0x1a7)
>  > 0000: 31 39 62 0d 0a 3c 3f 78 6d 6c 20 76 65 72 73 69 19b..<?xml versi
>  > 0010: 6f 6e 3d 22 31 2e 30 22 20 65 6e 63 6f 64 69 6e on="1.0" encodin
>  > 0020: 67 3d 22 55 54 46 2d 38 22 3f 3e 3c 6b 6d 6c 20 g="UTF-8"?><kml
>  > 0030: 78 6d 6c 6e 73 3d 22 68 74 74 70 3a 2f 2f 65 61 xmlns="http://ea
>  > 0040: 72 74 68 2e 67 6f 6f 67 6c 65 2e 63 6f 6d 2f 6b rth.google.com/k
>  > 0050: 6d 6c 2f 32 2e 30 22 3e 3c 50 6c 61 63 65 6d 61 ml/2.0"><Placema
>  > 0060: 72 6b 3e 3c 6e 61 6d 65 3e 4e c3 a6 72 75 6d 2c rk><name>N..rum,
>  > 0070: 20 44 65 6e 6d 61 72 6b 3c 2f 6e 61 6d 65 3e 3c  Denmark</name><
>  > 0080: 61 64 64 72 65 73 73 3e 4e 61 65 72 75 6d 2c 20 address>Naerum,
>  > 0090: 44 65 6e 6d 61 72 6b 3c 2f 61 64 64 72 65 73 73 Denmark</address
>  > 00a0: 3e 3c 73 74 79 6c 65 55 72 6c 3e 72 6f 6f 74 3a ><styleUrl>root:
>  > 00b0: 2f 2f 73 74 79 6c 65 4d 61 70 73 23 64 65 66 61 //styleMaps#defa
>  > 00c0: 75 6c 74 2b 6e 69 63 6f 6e 3d 30 78 33 30 34 2b ult+nicon=0x304+
>  > 00d0: 68 69 63 6f 6e 3d 30 78 33 31 34 3c 2f 73 74 79 hicon=0x314</sty
>  > 00e0: 6c 65 55 72 6c 3e 3c 50 6f 69 6e 74 3e 3c 63 6f leUrl><Point><co
>  > 00f0: 6f 72 64 69 6e 61 74 65 73 3e 31 32 2e 35 33 37 ordinates>12.537
>  > 0100: 38 39 35 2c 35 35 2e 38 31 36 33 32 38 2c 30 3c 895,55.816328,0<
>  > 0110: 2f 63 6f 6f 72 64 69 6e 61 74 65 73 3e 3c 2f 50 /coordinates></P
>  > 0120: 6f 69 6e 74 3e 3c 4c 6f 6f 6b 41 74 3e 3c 6c 6f oint><LookAt><lo
>  > 0130: 6e 67 69 74 75 64 65 3e 31 32 2e 35 33 37 38 39 ngitude>12.53789
>  > 0140: 35 3c 2f 6c 6f 6e 67 69 74 75 64 65 3e 3c 6c 61 5</longitude><la
>  > 0150: 74 69 74 75 64 65 3e 35 35 2e 38 31 36 33 32 38 titude>55.816328
>  > 0160: 3c 2f 6c 61 74 69 74 75 64 65 3e 3c 72 61 6e 67 </latitude><rang
>  > 0170: 65 3e 31 35 36 37 2e 30 34 37 32 34 31 3c 2f 72 e>1567.047241</r
>  > 0180: 61 6e 67 65 3e 3c 2f 4c 6f 6f 6b 41 74 3e 3c 2f ange></LookAt></
>  > 0190: 50 6c 61 63 65 6d 61 72 6b 3e 3c 2f 6b 6d 6c 3e Placemark></kml>
>  > 01a0: 0d 0a 30 0d 0a 0d 0a                            ..0....
>  >
>  > I'm wondering about the latin small letter lambda before the XML,
>  > shouldn't that be incorrect?
>  > Because it parses fine and it surprised me actually.
>  >
>  > Cheers,
>  > Bryan Rasmussen
>  >
>  > _______________________________________________________________________
>  >
>  > XML-DEV is a publicly archived, unmoderated list hosted by OASIS
>  > to support XML implementation and development. To minimize
>  > spam in the archives, you must subscribe before posting.
>  >
>  > [Un]Subscribe/change address: http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/
>  > Or unsubscribe: xml-dev-unsubscribe@l...
>  > subscribe: xml-dev-subscribe@l...
>  > List archive: http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
>  > List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php
>  >
>
>
>  --
>  John Snelson, Oracle Corporation            http://snelson.org.uk/john
>  Berkeley DB XML:        http://www.oracle.com/database/berkeley-db/xml
>  XQilla:                                  http://xqilla.sourceforge.net
>

• References:
  • should this be well-formed?
    • From: "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...>
  • Re: should this be well-formed?
    • From: John Snelson <john.snelson@o...>