XML-DEV Mailing List Archive by date - December, 2007

• RE: RE: Caution using XML Schema backward- or forward-compatibility as a versioning strategy for data exchange
  • From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@h...> on 31 Dec 2007 19:03:52 -0000
• Re: RE: Caution using XML Schema backward- or forward-compatibility as a versioning strategy for data exchange
  • From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...> on 31 Dec 2007 18:09:30 -0000
• RE: RE: Caution using XML Schema backward- or forward-compatibility as a versioning strategy for data exchange
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...> on 31 Dec 2007 17:18:38 -0000
• RE: RE: Caution using XML Schema backward- or forward-compatibility as a versioning strategy for data exchange
  • From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@h...> on 31 Dec 2007 15:47:08 -0000
• Re: RE: Caution using XML Schema backward- or forward-compatibility as a versioning strategy for data exchange
  • From "Stephen Green" <stephengreenubl@g...> on 31 Dec 2007 12:46:21 -0000
• RE: hexBinary type
  • From "Eran Balter" <E.Balter@F...> on 31 Dec 2007 08:46:58 -0000
• RE: hexBinary type
  • From Michael Glavassevich <mrglavas@c...> on 31 Dec 2007 04:15:56 -0000
• Re: RE: Caution using XML Schema backward- or forward-compatibilityas a versioning strategy for data exchange
  • From Thomas Lord <lord@e...> on 31 Dec 2007 00:43:39 -0000
• Re: Error: "Invalid byte 1 of 1-byte UTF-8 sequence" ?
  • From richard@i... (Richard Tobin) on 30 Dec 2007 23:43:05 -0000
• RE: hexBinary type
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 30 Dec 2007 22:27:30 -0000
• RE: RE: Caution using XML Schema backward- or forward-compatibility as a versioning strategy for data exchange
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...> on 30 Dec 2007 21:39:04 -0000
• hexBinary type
  • From "Eran Balter" <E.Balter@F...> on 30 Dec 2007 18:12:41 -0000
• Re: RE: Caution using XML Schema backward- or forward-compatibility as a versioning strategy for data exchange
  • From "Fraser Goffin" <goffinf@g...> on 30 Dec 2007 13:52:23 -0000
• Re: RE: Caution using XML Schema backward- or forward-compatibility as a versioning strategy for data exchange
  • From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...> on 30 Dec 2007 08:55:34 -0000
• Re: RE: Caution using XML Schema backward- or forward-compatibilityas a versioning strategy for data exchange
  • From Thomas Lord <lord@e...> on 30 Dec 2007 01:00:01 -0000
• RE: RE: Caution using XML Schema backward- or forward-compatibility as a versioning strategy for data exchange
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...> on 30 Dec 2007 00:31:33 -0000
• Re: RE: Caution using XML Schema backward- or forward-compatibility as a versioning strategy for data exchange
  • From "Stephen Green" <stephengreenubl@g...> on 29 Dec 2007 23:32:27 -0000
• Re: RE: Caution using XML Schema backward- or forward-compatibility as a versioning strategy for data exchange
  • From "Fraser Goffin" <goffinf@g...> on 29 Dec 2007 16:54:27 -0000
• RE: RE: Caution using XML Schema backward- or forward-compatibility as a versioning strategy for data exchange
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...> on 28 Dec 2007 14:03:05 -0000
• Re: RE: Caution using XML Schema backward- or forward-compatibilityas a versioning strategy for data exchange
  • From Thomas Lord <lord@e...> on 27 Dec 2007 21:25:28 -0000
• RE: Caution using XML Schema backward- or forward-compatibilityas a versioning strategy for data exchange
  • From "Cox, Bruce" <Bruce.Cox@U...> on 27 Dec 2007 20:22:24 -0000
• Re: Caution using XML Schema backward- or forward-compatibility as a versioning strategy for data exchange
  • From "Fraser Goffin" <goffinf@g...> on 27 Dec 2007 19:03:11 -0000
• Re: Caution using XML Schema backward- or forward-compatibilityas a versioning strategy for data exchange
  • From David Carver <d_a_carver@y...> on 27 Dec 2007 19:01:26 -0000
• RE: Error: "Invalid byte 1 of 1-byte UTF-8 sequence" ?
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 27 Dec 2007 18:44:04 -0000
• RE: Caution using XML Schema backward- or forward-compatibility as a versioning strategy for data exchange
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 27 Dec 2007 18:41:17 -0000
• Re: Caution using XML Schema backward- or forward-compatibility as a versioning strategy for data exchange
  • From "Fraser Goffin" <goffinf@g...> on 27 Dec 2007 18:39:03 -0000
• Re: Error: "Invalid byte 1 of 1-byte UTF-8 sequence" ?
  • From "James Fuller" <james.fuller.2007@g...> on 27 Dec 2007 17:21:28 -0000
• Re: Error: "Invalid byte 1 of 1-byte UTF-8 sequence" ?
  • From "Tony Lavinio" <alavinio@g...> on 27 Dec 2007 17:01:25 -0000
• Error: "Invalid byte 1 of 1-byte UTF-8 sequence" ?
  • From "Ben Stover" <bxstover@y...> on 27 Dec 2007 16:43:18 -0000
• Re: Caution using XML Schema backward- or forward-compatibility as a versioning strategy for data exchange
  • From "Stephen Green" <stephengreenubl@g...> on 27 Dec 2007 15:06:59 -0000
• Re: Caution using XML Schema backward- or forward-compatibilityas a versioning strategy for data exchange
  • From David Carver <d_a_carver@y...> on 27 Dec 2007 14:42:12 -0000
• Re: Caution using XML Schema backward- or forward-compatibility as a versioning strategy for data exchange
  • From "Greg Hunt" <greg@f...> on 27 Dec 2007 14:35:32 -0000
• RE: Caution using XML Schema backward- or forward-compatibility as a versioning strategy for data exchange
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 27 Dec 2007 14:09:43 -0000
• Re: Caution using XML Schema backward- or forward-compatibility as a versioning strategy for data exchange
  • From "Fraser Goffin" <goffinf@g...> on 27 Dec 2007 13:51:22 -0000
• Re: Caution using XML Schema backward- or forward-compatibility as a versioning strategy for data exchange
  • From "Fraser Goffin" <goffinf@g...> on 27 Dec 2007 13:41:51 -0000
• Re: Caution using XML Schema backward- or forward-compatibility as a versioning strategy for data exchange
  • From "Fraser Goffin" <goffinf@g...> on 27 Dec 2007 13:32:15 -0000
• RE: Caution using XML Schema backward- or forward-compatibility as a versioning strategy for data exchange
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...> on 27 Dec 2007 13:25:12 -0000
• RE: Caution using XML Schema backward- or forward-compatibility as a versioning strategy for data exchange
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 27 Dec 2007 11:13:10 -0000
• Re: Caution using XML Schema backward- or forward-compatibility as a versioning strategy for data exchange
  • From "Greg Hunt" <greg@f...> on 27 Dec 2007 10:44:43 -0000
• Re: Caution using XML Schema backward- or forward-compatibility as a versioning strategy for data exchange
  • From "Stephen Green" <stephengreenubl@g...> on 27 Dec 2007 09:33:28 -0000
• Re: Caution using XML Schema backward- or forward-compatibility as a versioning strategy for data exchange
  • From "Greg Hunt" <greg@f...> on 27 Dec 2007 07:08:32 -0000
• Re: Caution using XML Schema backward- or forward-compatibility as a versioning strategy for data exchange
  • From "Stephen Green" <stephengreenubl@g...> on 27 Dec 2007 06:22:26 -0000
• Re: Caution using XML Schema backward- or forward-compatibility as a versioning strategy for data exchange
  • From "Greg Hunt" <greg@f...> on 27 Dec 2007 00:14:27 -0000
• Re: Caution using XML Schema backward- or forward-compatibilityas a versioning strategy for data exchange
  • From Thomas Lord <lord@e...> on 26 Dec 2007 21:58:16 -0000
• RE: Caution using XML Schema backward- or forward-compatibility as a versioning strategy for data exchange
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...> on 26 Dec 2007 21:00:27 -0000
• Re: Caution using XML Schema backward- or forward-compatibilityas a versioning strategy for data exchange
  • From David Carver <d_a_carver@y...> on 26 Dec 2007 20:39:08 -0000
• RE: Caution using XML Schema backward- or forward-compatibility as a versioning strategy for data exchange
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...> on 26 Dec 2007 20:29:13 -0000
• Re: Caution using XML Schema backward- or forward-compatibilityas a versioning strategy for data exchange
  • From David Carver <d_a_carver@y...> on 26 Dec 2007 20:06:14 -0000
• Re: Caution using XML Schema backward- or forward-compatibility as a versioning strategy for data exchange
  • From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...> on 26 Dec 2007 19:12:13 -0000
• RE: Caution using XML Schema backward- or forward-compatibility as a versioning strategy for data exchange
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...> on 26 Dec 2007 19:02:02 -0000
• Caution using XML Schema backward- or forward-compatibility as a versioning strategy for data exchange
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...> on 26 Dec 2007 16:09:41 -0000
• Announcing Flower 0.5
  • From Thomas Lord <lord@e...> on 22 Dec 2007 03:14:30 -0000
• RE: Data versioning strategy: address semantic, relationship, and syntactic changes?
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...> on 21 Dec 2007 19:58:16 -0000
• Re: XML without a net - XPackage step for XProc?
  • From "Stephen Green" <stephengreenubl@g...> on 21 Dec 2007 14:39:52 -0000
• Re: XML without a net - XPackage step for XProc?
  • From Dave Pawson <davep@d...> on 21 Dec 2007 14:06:54 -0000
• Re: XML without a net - XPackage step for XProc?
  • From "Stephen Green" <stephengreenubl@g...> on 21 Dec 2007 12:42:51 -0000
• Re: XML without a net - XPackage step for XProc?
  • From "Stephen Green" <stephengreenubl@g...> on 21 Dec 2007 12:06:15 -0000
• Re: XML without a net - XPackage step for XProc?
  • From "Ken North" <kennorth@s...> on 20 Dec 2007 22:48:26 -0000
• Re: Data versioning strategy: address semantic, relationship, and syntactic changes?
  • From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...> on 20 Dec 2007 22:44:15 -0000
• Re: Data versioning strategy: address semantic, relationship,and syntactic changes?
  • From Ian Graham <ian.graham@u...> on 20 Dec 2007 22:24:16 -0000
• Re: Data versioning strategy: address semantic, relationship, and syntactic changes?
  • From "Stephen Green" <stephengreenubl@g...> on 20 Dec 2007 21:22:07 -0000
• RE: Data versioning strategy: address semantic, relationship, and syntactic changes?
  • From Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...> on 20 Dec 2007 19:47:10 -0000
• RE: Data versioning strategy: address semantic, relationship, and syntactic changes?
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...> on 20 Dec 2007 19:22:56 -0000
• Re: XML without a net - XPackage step for XProc?
  • From "Stephen Green" <stephengreenubl@g...> on 20 Dec 2007 18:45:08 -0000
• Re: XML without a net - XPackage step for XProc?
  • From Philippe Poulard <philippe.poulard@s...> on 20 Dec 2007 15:59:35 -0000
• XML without a net - XPackage step for XProc?
  • From "Ken North" <kennorth@s...> on 20 Dec 2007 10:20:03 -0000
• Re: Re: Structured from/within unstructured documents
  • From Marcus Carr <mcarr@a...> on 18 Dec 2007 23:09:17 -0000
• [ANN] oXygen XML editor 9.1
  • From George Cristian Bina <george@o...> on 18 Dec 2007 18:26:46 -0000
• Re: Re: Structured from/within unstructured documents
  • From "Edward C. Zimmermann" <edz@b...> on 18 Dec 2007 10:47:40 -0000
• Re: Re: Structured from/within unstructured documents
  • From "Stephen Green" <stephengreenubl@g...> on 18 Dec 2007 10:02:40 -0000
• Re: Structured from/within unstructured documents
  • From Marcus Carr <mcarr@a...> on 17 Dec 2007 23:20:51 -0000
• RE: Fwd: Data versioning strategy: address semantic, re lationship, and syntactic changes?
  • From Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...> on 17 Dec 2007 19:09:03 -0000
• RE: Fwd: Data versioning strategy: address semantic, re lationship, and syntactic changes?
  • From "Dave Orchard" <orchard@p...> on 17 Dec 2007 18:59:26 -0000
• [ANN] RefleX 0.3.0 is out !
  • From Philippe Poulard <philippe.poulard@s...> on 17 Dec 2007 17:46:47 -0000
• Re: having elements starting with integer in xml
  • From "Senthil Nathan" <rsennat@g...> on 17 Dec 2007 15:44:41 -0000
• Re: having elements starting with integer in xml
  • From Philippe Poulard <philippe.poulard@s...> on 17 Dec 2007 13:58:18 -0000
• RE: having elements starting with integer in xml
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 17 Dec 2007 13:54:27 -0000
• Re: having elements starting with integer in xml
  • From Manos Batsis <manos_lists@g...> on 17 Dec 2007 13:42:18 -0000
• Re: having elements starting with integer in xml
  • From David Carlisle <davidc@n...> on 17 Dec 2007 13:10:03 -0000
• having elements starting with integer in xml
  • From "Senthil Nathan" <rsennat@g...> on 17 Dec 2007 12:57:13 -0000
• Re: Structured from/within unstructured documents
  • From "Stephen Green" <stephengreenubl@g...> on 16 Dec 2007 13:03:35 -0000
• Re: Structured from/within unstructured documents
  • From "Greg Hunt" <greg@f...> on 16 Dec 2007 12:53:36 -0000
• Re: Structured from/within unstructured documents
  • From "Edward C. Zimmermann" <edz@b...> on 16 Dec 2007 12:48:53 -0000
• Re: Structured from/within unstructured documents
  • From "Stephen Green" <stephengreenubl@g...> on 16 Dec 2007 12:39:56 -0000
• Re: Structured from/within unstructured documents
  • From "Edward C. Zimmermann" <edz@b...> on 16 Dec 2007 09:43:38 -0000
• Re: Structured from/within unstructured documents
  • From "Greg Hunt" <greg@f...> on 16 Dec 2007 07:15:16 -0000
• Re: Structured from/within unstructured documents
  • From "Edward C. Zimmermann" <edz@b...> on 16 Dec 2007 06:36:22 -0000
• Re: Structured from/within unstructured documents
  • From "Stephen Green" <stephengreenubl@g...> on 15 Dec 2007 23:05:08 -0000
• Re: Structured from/within unstructured documents
  • From "Dimitre Novatchev" <dnovatchev@y...> on 15 Dec 2007 20:04:05 -0000
• Re: Structured from/within unstructured documents
  • From Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@r...> on 15 Dec 2007 19:31:47 -0000
• Structured from/within unstructured documents
  • From "Stephen Green" <stephengreenubl@g...> on 15 Dec 2007 18:04:53 -0000
• RE: Fwd: Data versioning strategy: address semantic, re lationship, and syntactic changes?
  • From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@h...> on 15 Dec 2007 02:52:18 -0000
• RE: Fwd: Data versioning strategy: address semantic, re lationship, and syntactic changes?
  • From noah_mendelsohn@u... on 15 Dec 2007 00:18:31 -0000
• RE: Fwd: Data versioning strategy: address semantic, re lationship, and syntactic changes?
  • From Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...> on 14 Dec 2007 23:02:46 -0000
• RE: Fwd: Data versioning strategy: address semantic, re lationship, and syntactic changes?
  • From noah_mendelsohn@u... on 14 Dec 2007 21:56:18 -0000
• RE: Fwd: Data versioning strategy: address semantic, re lationship, and syntactic changes?
  • From Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...> on 14 Dec 2007 20:20:31 -0000
• RE: Fwd: Data versioning strategy: address semantic, re lationship, and syntactic changes?
  • From Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...> on 14 Dec 2007 17:16:18 -0000
• Re: [Announce] XQilla 2.0 released under Apache Licensev2
  • From Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@r...> on 14 Dec 2007 16:56:43 -0000
• RE: Fwd: Data versioning strategy: address semantic, relationship, and syntactic changes?
  • From noah_mendelsohn@u... on 14 Dec 2007 16:54:42 -0000
• Re: Allowed characters for NCName
  • From "Desmond Kirrane" <desmond.kirrane@g...> on 14 Dec 2007 10:35:31 -0000
• XqUSEme - XQuery extension for Firefox
  • From Brett Zamir <brettz9@y...> on 14 Dec 2007 00:32:32 -0000
• RE: Fwd: Data versioning strategy: address semantic, relationship, and syntactic changes?
  • From Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...> on 13 Dec 2007 23:40:39 -0000
• Re: Fwd: Data versioning strategy: address semantic, relationship, andsyntactic changes?
  • From noah_mendelsohn@u... on 13 Dec 2007 21:48:47 -0000
• RE: Allowed characters for NCName
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 13 Dec 2007 18:35:30 -0000
• Re: Allowed characters for NCName
  • From Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@a...> on 13 Dec 2007 14:26:16 -0000
• RE: The prefix "fgdc" for element "fgdc:fgdc" is not bound
  • From "Nassar, Anthony" <ANassar@H...> on 13 Dec 2007 13:55:04 -0000
• Re: Allowed characters for NCName
  • From David Carlisle <davidc@n...> on 13 Dec 2007 12:52:18 -0000
• Re: Allowed characters for NCName
  • From "Desmond Kirrane" <desmond.kirrane@g...> on 13 Dec 2007 12:09:32 -0000
• Re: Allowed characters for NCName
  • From "Andrew Welch" <andrew.j.welch@g...> on 13 Dec 2007 11:40:23 -0000
• Allowed characters for NCName
  • From "Desmond Kirrane" <desmond.kirrane@g...> on 13 Dec 2007 11:34:28 -0000
• Re: The prefix "fgdc" for element "fgdc:fgdc" is not bound
  • From "Fraser Goffin" <goffinf@g...> on 13 Dec 2007 09:05:34 -0000
• RE: The prefix "fgdc" for element "fgdc:fgdc" is not bound
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 13 Dec 2007 07:44:23 -0000
• RE: The prefix "fgdc" for element "fgdc:fgdc" is not bound
  • From "Nassar, Anthony" <ANassar@H...> on 13 Dec 2007 01:43:48 -0000
• RE: The prefix "fgdc" for element "fgdc:fgdc" is not bound
  • From noah_mendelsohn@u... on 13 Dec 2007 00:37:00 -0000
• RE: The prefix "fgdc" for element "fgdc:fgdc" is not bound
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 13 Dec 2007 00:16:39 -0000
• RE: The prefix "fgdc" for element "fgdc:fgdc" is not bound
  • From noah_mendelsohn@u... on 12 Dec 2007 23:33:24 -0000
• [Announce] XQilla 2.0 released under Apache License v2
  • From John Snelson <john.snelson@o...> on 12 Dec 2007 23:07:43 -0000
• RE: The prefix "fgdc" for element "fgdc:fgdc" is not bound
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 12 Dec 2007 22:49:38 -0000
• [Fwd: IBM XML cert. preparation]
  • From Khaled Aly <ka.aly@l...> on 12 Dec 2007 22:28:13 -0000
• RE: The prefix "fgdc" for element "fgdc:fgdc" is not bound
  • From "Nassar, Anthony" <ANassar@H...> on 12 Dec 2007 19:28:59 -0000
• RE: The prefix "fgdc" for element "fgdc:fgdc" is not bound
  • From "Nassar, Anthony" <ANassar@H...> on 12 Dec 2007 15:58:40 -0000
• Re: [ANN] Axl Library 0.4.13 'Fine for me' release isavailable!
  • From Francis Brosnan Blazquez <francis@a...> on 12 Dec 2007 10:11:22 -0000
• Re: [ANN] Axl Library 0.4.13 'Fine for me' release is available!
  • From "Alexander Johannesen" <alexander.johannesen@g...> on 12 Dec 2007 09:46:53 -0000
• [ANN] Axl Library 0.4.13 'Fine for me' release is available!
  • From Francis Brosnan Blazquez <francis@a...> on 12 Dec 2007 09:37:04 -0000
• A dedicated developer list for OASIS CLRTC projects and issues
  • From "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@C...> on 12 Dec 2007 00:48:29 -0000
• Re: The prefix "fgdc" for element "fgdc:fgdc" is not bound
  • From richard@i... (Richard Tobin) on 11 Dec 2007 23:34:47 -0000
• RE: Data versioning strategy: address semantic, relatio nship, and syntactic changes?
  • From Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...> on 11 Dec 2007 20:14:29 -0000
• RE: The prefix "fgdc" for element "fgdc:fgdc" is not bound
  • From "Timothy Lepczyk" <tlepczyk@w...> on 11 Dec 2007 19:54:10 -0000
• Re: Data versioning strategy: address semantic, relatio nship, and syntactic changes?
  • From "Greg Hunt" <greg@f...> on 11 Dec 2007 19:25:16 -0000
• RE: The prefix "fgdc" for element "fgdc:fgdc" is not bound
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 11 Dec 2007 18:26:20 -0000
• Re: The prefix "fgdc" for element "fgdc:fgdc" is not bound
  • From "Anne Thomas Manes" <atmanes@g...> on 11 Dec 2007 16:19:07 -0000
• [Announce] Stylus Studio 2008 Now Available
  • From "Stylus Studio" <stylusstudio@g...> on 11 Dec 2007 15:48:50 -0000
• RE: Data versioning strategy: address semantic, relationship, and syntactic changes?
  • From Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...> on 11 Dec 2007 14:27:32 -0000
• ANN: Orbeon Forms 3.6 Final Released
  • From Erik Bruchez <erik@b...> on 11 Dec 2007 02:48:41 -0000
• Re: Data versioning strategy: address semantic, relationship,and syntactic changes?
  • From Thomas Lord <lord@e...> on 11 Dec 2007 02:37:02 -0000
• RE: Data versioning strategy: address semantic, relationship, and syntactic changes?
  • From "Dave Orchard" <orchard@p...> on 11 Dec 2007 01:33:20 -0000
• RE: Data versioning strategy: address semantic, relationship, and syntactic changes?
  • From Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...> on 11 Dec 2007 00:20:57 -0000
• RE: Data versioning strategy: address semantic,relationship, and syntactic changes?
  • From "Cox, Bruce" <Bruce.Cox@U...> on 11 Dec 2007 00:02:26 -0000
• RE: The prefix "fgdc" for element "fgdc:fgdc" is not bound
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 10 Dec 2007 19:30:01 -0000
• RE: The prefix "fgdc" for element "fgdc:fgdc" is not bound
  • From "Waters, Michael, Springer US" <Mike.Waters@s...> on 10 Dec 2007 19:11:52 -0000
• Re: Mime type for compound document.
  • From "Stephen Green" <stephengreenubl@g...> on 10 Dec 2007 18:57:02 -0000
• The prefix "fgdc" for element "fgdc:fgdc" is not bound
  • From "Timothy Lepczyk" <tlepczyk@w...> on 10 Dec 2007 18:04:43 -0000
• Re: Mime type for compound document.
  • From "Mark Baker" <distobj@a...> on 10 Dec 2007 17:32:28 -0000
• Re: Data versioning strategy: address semantic,relationship, and syntactic changes?
  • From B Tommie Usdin <btusdin@m...> on 10 Dec 2007 14:09:59 -0000
• RE: Some Problems about Sax
  • From Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...> on 10 Dec 2007 13:54:09 -0000
• RE: Some Problems about Sax
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> on 10 Dec 2007 09:35:53 -0000
• Re: Data versioning strategy: address semantic, relationship, and syntactic changes?
  • From "Fraser Goffin" <goffinf@g...> on 10 Dec 2007 09:26:56 -0000
• Re: Some Problems about Sax
  • From "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@C...> on 10 Dec 2007 08:25:58 -0000
• Some Problems about Sax
  • From "james jiang" <jamesjiang07@g...> on 10 Dec 2007 07:57:34 -0000
• Re: Data versioning strategy: address semantic,relationship, and syntactic changes?
  • From B Tommie Usdin <btusdin@m...> on 9 Dec 2007 22:06:09 -0000
• Fwd: Data versioning strategy: address semantic, relationship, and syntactic changes?
  • From "Greg Hunt" <greg@f...> on 9 Dec 2007 19:47:16 -0000
• Re: Data versioning strategy: address semantic, relationship, and syntactic changes?
  • From "Stephen Green" <stephengreenubl@g...> on 9 Dec 2007 10:48:50 -0000
• Re: Data versioning strategy: address semantic, relationship,and syntactic changes?
  • From David Carver <d_a_carver@y...> on 8 Dec 2007 20:27:59 -0000
• Announce: XQuery Update Facility Test Suite, version 0.7
  • From Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@r...> on 8 Dec 2007 17:30:53 -0000
• Re: Data versioning strategy: address semantic, relationship, and syntactic changes?
  • From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...> on 8 Dec 2007 10:52:45 -0000
• Re: SOAP/SOA and REST/ROA ???
  • From "Mark Baker" <mark@c...> on 8 Dec 2007 05:18:45 -0000
• Data versioning strategy: address semantic, relationship, and syntactic changes?
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...> on 7 Dec 2007 20:56:22 -0000
• Re: SOAP/SOA and REST/ROA ???
  • From noah_mendelsohn@u... on 7 Dec 2007 20:44:28 -0000
• Re: SOAP/SOA and REST/ROA ???
  • From Richard Salz <rsalz@u...> on 7 Dec 2007 19:56:55 -0000
• IBM XML cert. preparation
  • From Khaled Aly <ka.aly@l...> on 7 Dec 2007 19:48:51 -0000
• Re: SOAP/SOA and REST/ROA ???
  • From Michael Champion <mc@x...> on 7 Dec 2007 19:18:50 -0000
• RE: SOAP/SOA and REST/ROA ???
  • From Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...> on 7 Dec 2007 18:31:05 -0000
• Re: MarkMail: now archiving xml-dev
  • From Jason Hunter <jhunter@a...> on 7 Dec 2007 17:39:24 -0000
• Re: Mime type for compound document.
  • From Dave Pawson <davep@d...> on 7 Dec 2007 17:08:05 -0000
• Re: SOAP/SOA and REST/ROA ???
  • From "Mark Baker" <mark@c...> on 7 Dec 2007 16:51:38 -0000
• Re: Mime type for compound document.
  • From "Mark Baker" <mark@c...> on 7 Dec 2007 13:19:22 -0000
• Re: MarkMail: now archiving xml-dev
  • From Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...> on 7 Dec 2007 12:40:30 -0000
• Re: Mime type for compound document.
  • From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...> on 7 Dec 2007 09:24:01 -0000
• Re: Mime type for compound document.
  • From Dave Pawson <davep@d...> on 7 Dec 2007 09:20:12 -0000
• Re: SOAP/SOA and REST/ROA ???
  • From Michael Champion <mc@x...> on 7 Dec 2007 02:45:53 -0000
• Re: SOAP/SOA and REST/ROA ???
  • From noah_mendelsohn@u... on 6 Dec 2007 23:35:44 -0000
• Re: Mime type for compound document.
  • From "Stephen Green" <stephengreenubl@g...> on 6 Dec 2007 23:12:00 -0000
• Re: Mime type for compound document.
  • From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...> on 6 Dec 2007 21:43:02 -0000
• Re: Mime type for compound document.
  • From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...> on 6 Dec 2007 21:10:43 -0000
• Mime type for compound document.
  • From Dave Pawson <davep@d...> on 6 Dec 2007 19:32:44 -0000
• XSD modelling question
  • From dave <ceek63@y...> on 6 Dec 2007 19:07:45 -0000
• RE: SOAP/SOA and REST/ROA ???
  • From Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...> on 6 Dec 2007 14:11:25 -0000
• Re: SOAP/SOA and REST/ROA ???
  • From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...> on 6 Dec 2007 08:36:31 -0000
• SOAP/SOA and REST/ROA ???
  • From Michael Champion <mc@x...> on 6 Dec 2007 06:08:43 -0000
• Re: The association of SOA with SOAP, and to the inevitable endsof religious wars
  • From noah_mendelsohn@u... on 5 Dec 2007 22:45:15 -0000
• Re: The association of SOA with SOAP, and to the inevitable ends of religious wars
  • From "Fraser Goffin" <goffinf@g...> on 5 Dec 2007 18:06:04 -0000
• RE: The association of SOA with SOAP, and to the inevitable ends of religious wars
  • From Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...> on 5 Dec 2007 16:58:41 -0000
• Re: The association of SOA with SOAP, and to the inevitable ends of religious wars
  • From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...> on 5 Dec 2007 16:26:53 -0000
• Re: The association of SOA with SOAP, and to the inevitable ends of religious wars
  • From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...> on 5 Dec 2007 16:08:16 -0000
• [ANN] XTech 2008 Call for Participation
  • From Edd Dumbill <edd@u...> on 5 Dec 2007 16:02:31 -0000
• Re: The association of SOA with SOAP, and to the inevitable endsof religious wars
  • From noah_mendelsohn@u... on 5 Dec 2007 14:52:54 -0000
• Re: The association of SOA with SOAP, and to the inevitable ends of religious wars
  • From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...> on 5 Dec 2007 11:08:29 -0000
• Re: The association of SOA with SOAP, and to the inevitable ends of religious wars
  • From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...> on 5 Dec 2007 11:01:14 -0000
• Re: The association of SOA with SOAP, and to the inevitable ends of religious wars
  • From "Fraser Goffin" <goffinf@g...> on 5 Dec 2007 09:46:10 -0000
• Re: The association of SOA with SOAP, and to the inevitable ends of religious wars
  • From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...> on 4 Dec 2007 21:48:46 -0000
• Re: The association of SOA with SOAP, and to the inevitable ends of religious wars
  • From "Fraser Goffin" <goffinf@g...> on 4 Dec 2007 18:17:21 -0000
• The association of SOA with SOAP, and to the inevitable ends of religious wars
  • From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...> on 4 Dec 2007 16:05:28 -0000
• [ANN] XMLmind XML Editor 3.7.0
  • From Olivier Ishacian <olivier@x...> on 3 Dec 2007 12:55:20 -0000
• Re: editing XML with Spreadsheets, most likely Excel
  • From Nicholas Sushkin <nsushkin@o...> on 3 Dec 2007 12:46:18 -0000
• Re: editing XML with Spreadsheets, most likely Excel
  • From "Andrew Welch" <andrew.j.welch@g...> on 3 Dec 2007 10:29:19 -0000
• Re: editing XML with Spreadsheets, most likely Excel
  • From noah_mendelsohn@u... on 3 Dec 2007 04:06:43 -0000
• Re: editing XML with Spreadsheets, most likely Excel
  • From "Stephen Green" <stephengreenubl@g...> on 2 Dec 2007 08:52:15 -0000
• Re: editing XML with Spreadsheets, most likely Excel
  • From Dave Pawson <davep@d...> on 2 Dec 2007 08:36:30 -0000
• Re: editing XML with Spreadsheets, most likely Excel
  • From "Stephen Green" <stephengreenubl@g...> on 1 Dec 2007 22:30:54 -0000
• Re: editing XML with Spreadsheets, most likely Excel
  • From "Stephen Green" <stephengreenubl@g...> on 1 Dec 2007 22:08:28 -0000
• editing XML with Spreadsheets, most likely Excel
  • From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...> on 1 Dec 2007 20:41:36 -0000