[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: The prefix "fgdc" for element "fgdc:fgdc" is not bound

• From: "Nassar, Anthony" <ANassar@H...>
• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 20:39:38 -0500

I thank everyone for their responses. Perhaps this bears out Dr. Kay's claim, but I'm actually more baffled than ever. If the NUnit test-results.xsd schema specifies *no* namespace, then the types it declares are in *no* namespace, is that right? How does a schema-aware parser use them, if at all? Does it simply fake it (i.e., if you were foolish enough to declare types in the non-namespace, I guess I'll have to bail you out)?

My more immediate question, which I might need to answer for myself, is simply, is NUnit's schema just "wrong"?

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: The prefix "fgdc" for element "fgdc:fgdc" is not bound
    • From: "Fraser Goffin" <goffinf@g...>
  • RE: The prefix "fgdc" for element "fgdc:fgdc" is not bound
    • From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>

• References:
  • The prefix "fgdc" for element "fgdc:fgdc" is not bound
    • From: "Timothy Lepczyk" <tlepczyk@w...>
  • Re: The prefix "fgdc" for element "fgdc:fgdc" is not bound
    • From: "Anne Thomas Manes" <atmanes@g...>
  • RE: The prefix "fgdc" for element "fgdc:fgdc" is not bound
    • From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>
  • RE: The prefix "fgdc" for element "fgdc:fgdc" is not bound
    • From: "Nassar, Anthony" <ANassar@H...>
  • RE: The prefix "fgdc" for element "fgdc:fgdc" is not bound
    • From: "Nassar, Anthony" <ANassar@H...>
  • RE: The prefix "fgdc" for element "fgdc:fgdc" is not bound
    • From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>