|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
[Recent Entries]
[Reply To This Message]
RE: The prefix "fgdc" for element "fgdc:fgdc" is not bound
- From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>
- To: "'Nassar, Anthony'" <ANassar@H...>,<xml-dev@l...>
- Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 07:43:31 -0000
Title: RE: The prefix "fgdc" for element "fgdc:fgdc" is not bound
Sorry to go off at a tangent and not answer your question.
A schema with no target namespaces should work completely symmetrically with one
that has a target namespaces. The non-namespace from this point of view behaves
just like a namespaces.
Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/
I thank everyone for their responses. Perhaps this bears out Dr. Kay's
claim, but I'm actually more baffled than ever. If the NUnit test-results.xsd
schema specifies *no* namespace, then the types it declares are in *no*
namespace, is that right? How does a schema-aware parser use them, if at all?
Does it simply fake it (i.e., if you were foolish enough to declare types in
the non-namespace, I guess I'll have to bail you out)?
My more immediate question, which I might need to answer for myself, is
simply, is NUnit's schema just "wrong"?
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format
| RSS 2.0 |
 |
| Atom 0.3 |
 |
| |
Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats,
enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.
|
Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website.
they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please
click here.
|
|
Cart
