[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: To namespace or not to Namespace ....
Max Toro schrieb am 09.04.2010 um 16:19:00 (-0400) [Re: To namespace or not to Namespace ....]: > > It all goes back to the fact that the namespace facility as designed > > back in 1999 was a really bad piece of design work. > I've heard that namespaces is a bad design several times, but I cannot > understand why it's a bad design, simply because I don't know what a > good design is. Namespaces is all I know, I have no reason to believe > it's a bad design unless someone point me to a good design, are there > any? I'm championing statically determinable namespaces that could be declared using a super-easy DTD syntax. I think it's a good design! But sadly, no one has ever commented. :-( I wonder whether this is because they think it's a bad idea? http://www.devcomments.com/To-namespace-or-not-to-Namespace-at131339.htm Some people think the DTD per se is a bad idea, but I don't :-) Here's how I grokked - after having become aware of various usability problems, which most of the time aren't problems for us power users - what's another real problem with namespaces, thanks to a kind explanation by Michael Kay: http://markmail.org/message/utae2qaibwkky7gr And here is the idea I then came up with: http://markmail.org/message/dbldtr52yawcrbtv -- Michael Ludwig
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|