[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
[Recent Entries]
[Reply To This Message]
XML-DEV Mailing List Archive by thread - April, 2010
3rd CfP: ACCESS 2010 || September 20-25, 2010 - Valencia, Spain, From Sandra Sendra<sandra.sendra.upv@gmail.com> on 2 Apr 2010 13:55:44 -0000
Announce: Early-bird date extended for XSLT/XQuery training [XML Dev], From "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com> on 3 Apr 2010 14:30:21 -0000
Searchable Namespaces, From Rick Yorgason <rick@firefang.com> on 4 Apr 2010 14:43:39 -0000
To namespace or not to Namespace ...., From David <dlee@calldei.com> on 5 Apr 2010 22:56:59 -0000
Followups by message-id references
Re: To namespace or not to Namespace ...., From Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org> on 6 Apr 2010 03:59:45 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Re: To namespace or not to Namespace ...., From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com> on 7 Apr 2010 12:50:02 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Re: To namespace or not to Namespace ...., From Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@gmail.com> on 7 Apr 2010 15:13:28 -0000
- Re: To namespace or not to Namespace ...., From "John L. Clark" <jlc6@po.cwru.edu> on 7 Apr 2010 15:23:35 -0000
- Re: To namespace or not to Namespace ...., From David <dlee@calldei.com> on 7 Apr 2010 17:16:03 -0000
- Re: To namespace or not to Namespace ...., From Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org> on 7 Apr 2010 17:33:38 -0000
- Re: To namespace or not to Namespace ...., From David <dlee@calldei.com> on 7 Apr 2010 17:43:42 -0000
- RE: To namespace or not to Namespace ...., From "Dowling, Nora M." <ndowling@mitre.org> on 7 Apr 2010 17:56:41 -0000
- Re: To namespace or not to Namespace ...., From David <dlee@calldei.com> on 7 Apr 2010 18:16:29 -0000
- Re: To namespace or not to Namespace ...., From Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org> on 7 Apr 2010 18:01:40 -0000
- Re: To namespace or not to Namespace ...., From Michael Ludwig <milu71@gmx.de> on 7 Apr 2010 18:23:06 -0000
- Re: To namespace or not to Namespace ...., From Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@gmail.com> on 8 Apr 2010 03:22:55 -0000
- Re: To namespace or not to Namespace ...., From Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org> on 7 Apr 2010 17:28:41 -0000
- Re: To namespace or not to Namespace ...., From Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@gmail.com> on 7 Apr 2010 18:27:03 -0000
- Re: To namespace or not to Namespace ...., From Stephen Green <stephengreenubl@gmail.com> on 7 Apr 2010 18:39:50 -0000
- Re: To namespace or not to Namespace ...., From Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@gmail.com> on 7 Apr 2010 18:44:58 -0000
- Re: To namespace or not to Namespace ...., From Michael Ludwig <milu71@gmx.de> on 7 Apr 2010 18:36:09 -0000
- Re: To namespace or not to Namespace ...., From Michael Ludwig <milu71@gmx.de> on 7 Apr 2010 18:43:19 -0000
- RE: To namespace or not to Namespace ...., From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 7 Apr 2010 19:52:07 -0000
- Re: To namespace or not to Namespace ...., From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com> on 7 Apr 2010 20:15:51 -0000
- Re: To namespace or not to Namespace ...., From Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@gmail.com> on 7 Apr 2010 20:33:21 -0000
- Re: To namespace or not to Namespace ...., From Uche Ogbuji <uche@ogbuji.net> on 7 Apr 2010 20:38:31 -0000
- Re: To namespace or not to Namespace ...., From Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@gmail.com> on 7 Apr 2010 20:46:16 -0000
- Re: To namespace or not to Namespace ...., From Uche Ogbuji <uche@ogbuji.net> on 7 Apr 2010 20:54:26 -0000
- Re: To namespace or not to Namespace ...., From Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@gmail.com> on 7 Apr 2010 21:55:36 -0000
- Re: To namespace or not to Namespace ...., From Dave Pawson <davep@dpawson.co.uk> on 8 Apr 2010 07:18:28 -0000
- Re: To namespace or not to Namespace ...., From Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@gmail.com> on 8 Apr 2010 08:03:20 -0000
- Re: To namespace or not to Namespace ...., From Stephen Green <stephengreenubl@gmail.com> on 8 Apr 2010 08:12:37 -0000
- RE: To namespace or not to Namespace ...., From "Michael Sokolov" <sokolov@ifactory.com> on 8 Apr 2010 12:23:21 -0000
- Re: To namespace or not to Namespace ...., From David <dlee@calldei.com> on 7 Apr 2010 20:43:24 -0000
Re: To namespace or not to Namespace ...., From Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@gmail.com> on 8 Apr 2010 13:35:26 -0000
Followups by message-id references
Re: To namespace or not to Namespace ...., From Kendall Shaw <kshaw@kendallshaw.com> on 8 Apr 2010 22:19:29 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Re: To namespace or not to Namespace ...., From Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org> on 9 Apr 2010 00:07:23 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Re: To namespace or not to Namespace ...., From Kendall Shaw <kshaw@kendallshaw.com> on 9 Apr 2010 04:08:38 -0000
- Re: To namespace or not to Namespace ...., From David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk> on 9 Apr 2010 08:42:55 -0000
- Re: To namespace or not to Namespace ...., From Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@gmail.com> on 9 Apr 2010 09:06:07 -0000
- RE: To namespace or not to Namespace ...., From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 9 Apr 2010 09:37:14 -0000
- Re: To namespace or not to Namespace ...., From Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@gmail.com> on 9 Apr 2010 10:12:20 -0000
- Re: To namespace or not to Namespace ...., From David <dlee@calldei.com> on 9 Apr 2010 10:37:05 -0000
- Re: To namespace or not to Namespace ...., From Max Toro <maxtoroq@gmail.com> on 9 Apr 2010 20:19:06 -0000
- RE: To namespace or not to Namespace ...., From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 9 Apr 2010 20:54:07 -0000
- Re: To namespace or not to Namespace ...., From Michael Ludwig <milu71@gmx.de> on 9 Apr 2010 21:12:17 -0000
- Re: To namespace or not to Namespace ...., From Max Toro <maxtoroq@gmail.com> on 9 Apr 2010 21:13:35 -0000
- Re: To namespace or not to Namespace ...., From Michael Ludwig <milu71@gmx.de> on 9 Apr 2010 21:26:34 -0000
- Re: To namespace or not to Namespace ...., From Rob Koberg <rob@koberg.com> on 9 Apr 2010 21:23:39 -0000
- Re: To namespace or not to Namespace ...., From Michael Ludwig <milu71@gmx.de> on 9 Apr 2010 22:07:33 -0000
- Re: To namespace or not to Namespace ...., From Max Toro <maxtoroq@gmail.com> on 9 Apr 2010 21:49:24 -0000
- RE: To namespace or not to Namespace ...., From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 9 Apr 2010 23:02:08 -0000
- Re: To namespace or not to Namespace ...., From Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@gmail.com> on 10 Apr 2010 08:31:24 -0000
- Re: To namespace or not to Namespace ...., From Rick Yorgason <rick@firefang.com> on 9 Apr 2010 21:53:32 -0000
- Re: To namespace or not to Namespace ...., From Dave Pawson <davep@dpawson.co.uk> on 10 Apr 2010 06:22:42 -0000
- Re: To namespace or not to Namespace ...., From Michael Ludwig <milu71@gmx.de> on 9 Apr 2010 20:55:33 -0000
- Re: To namespace or not to Namespace ...., From Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org> on 9 Apr 2010 18:50:36 -0000
- Re: To namespace or not to Namespace ...., From David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk> on 9 Apr 2010 19:03:41 -0000
- Re: To namespace or not to Namespace ...., From Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org> on 9 Apr 2010 19:16:40 -0000
- Re: To namespace or not to Namespace ...., From Michael Ludwig <milu71@gmx.de> on 9 Apr 2010 22:24:59 -0000
RE: To namespace or not to Namespace ...., From w3c@drrw.info on 6 Apr 2010 02:56:21 -0000
Followups by message-id references
RE: To namespace or not to Namespace ...., From "stephengreenubl@gmail.com" <stephengreenubl@gmail.com> on 8 Apr 2010 06:55:13 -0000
RE: To namespace or not to Namespace ...., From w3c@drrw.info on 8 Apr 2010 13:43:51 -0000
Re: To namespace or not to Namespace ...., From Jim Melton <jim.melton@acm.org> on 9 Apr 2010 18:25:29 -0000
New CAM v1.8 released - enhanced blueprint and canonical XML dictionarytools, From w3c@drrw.info on 7 Apr 2010 14:13:27 -0000
RE: Can mixed content be =?UTF-8?Q?constrained=3F?=, From w3c@drrw.info on 7 Apr 2010 14:17:05 -0000
IET COM journal, CFP: Special Issue on Sensor Intelligence & Data Fusion, From Jaime Lloret Mauri<jlloret@dcom.upv.es> on 7 Apr 2010 14:42:14 -0000
First Journal Article Tag Suite User Conference (JATS-Con), From Jeff Beck <beck@ncbi.nlm.nih.gov> on 7 Apr 2010 20:56:51 -0000
Why do W3C specifications have "implementation defined" parts?, From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 8 Apr 2010 12:06:25 -0000
Followups by message-id references
Re: Why do W3C specifications have "implementation defined" parts?, From "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com> on 8 Apr 2010 12:27:46 -0000
Re: Why do W3C specifications have "implementation defined"parts?, From David <dlee@calldei.com> on 8 Apr 2010 12:31:28 -0000
RE: Why do W3C specifications have "implementation defined" parts?, From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 8 Apr 2010 13:34:07 -0000
RE: Why do W3C specifications have "implementationdefined" parts?, From "stephengreenubl@gmail.com" <stephengreenubl@gmail.com> on 8 Apr 2010 12:24:48 -0000
Tools for comparing/merging schemas?, From "HILLMAN, Tomos" <tomos.hillman@oup.com> on 8 Apr 2010 13:00:43 -0000
Followups by message-id references
RE: To namespace or not to Namespace .... dictionaries are theanswer!, From w3c@drrw.info on 8 Apr 2010 13:22:26 -0000
RE: Tools for comparing/merging =?UTF-8?Q?schemas=3F?=, From w3c@drrw.info on 8 Apr 2010 13:32:29 -0000
RE: Why do W3C specifications have "implementation defined"=?UTF-8?Q?parts=3F?=, From w3c@drrw.info on 8 Apr 2010 13:40:18 -0000
[ANN] XQuery and XPath Full Text Test Suite version 1.0.2, From Jim Melton <jim.melton@oracle.com> on 10 Apr 2010 00:48:35 -0000
RE: Declarative programming requires a different mindset, From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 10 Apr 2010 17:29:05 -0000
Followups by message-id references
RE: RE: Declarative programming requires a different mindset, From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 14 Apr 2010 19:40:12 -0000
Re: RE: Declarative programming requires a differentmindset, From Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org> on 11 Apr 2010 06:09:44 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Re: RE: Declarative programming requires a different mindset, From Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@gmail.com> on 11 Apr 2010 08:39:29 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- RE: RE: Declarative programming requires a different mindset, From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 11 Apr 2010 09:17:55 -0000
- RE: RE: Declarative programming requires a different mindset, From "Michael Sokolov" <sokolov@ifactory.com> on 11 Apr 2010 12:27:52 -0000
- RE: RE: Declarative programming requires a differentmindset, From Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org> on 12 Apr 2010 06:03:23 -0000
- RE: RE: Declarative programming requires a different mindset, From "Michael Sokolov" <sokolov@ifactory.com> on 12 Apr 2010 11:57:12 -0000
- Re: RE: Declarative programming requires a different mindset, From David <dlee@calldei.com> on 12 Apr 2010 13:33:43 -0000
- PostScript language, why Turing complete? [was: Re: RE:Declarative programming requires a different mindset], From Jim DeLaHunt <from.xml-dev@jdlh.com> on 12 Apr 2010 19:20:11 -0000
- Re: PostScript language, why Turing complete? [was: Re: RE: Declarative programming requires a different mindset], From Michael Ludwig <milu71@gmx.de> on 12 Apr 2010 21:00:55 -0000
- Re: PostScript language, why Turing complete? [was: Re: RE: Declarative programming requires a different mindset], From Jim DeLaHunt <from.xml-dev@jdlh.com> on 13 Apr 2010 16:27:41 -0000
- RE: RE: Declarative programming requires a differentmindset, From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 11 Apr 2010 20:29:51 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Re: RE: Declarative programming requires a different mindset, From Michael Ludwig <milu71@gmx.de> on 11 Apr 2010 20:55:09 -0000
- Re: RE: Declarative programming requires a different mindset, From Dave butlerdi <butlerdi@gmail.com> on 11 Apr 2010 21:13:39 -0000
- Re: RE: Declarative programming requires a different mindset, From Frank Manola <fmanola@acm.org> on 11 Apr 2010 22:05:30 -0000
- RE: RE: Declarative programming requires a different mindset, From "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com> on 11 Apr 2010 22:30:00 -0000
- RE: RE: Declarative programming requires a different mindset, From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 11 Apr 2010 22:31:08 -0000
- RE: RE: Declarative programming requires a different mindset, From rjelliffe@allette.com.au on 12 Apr 2010 05:49:34 -0000
- Re: RE: Declarative programming requires a different mindset, From Kendall Shaw <kshaw@kendallshaw.com> on 12 Apr 2010 19:15:03 -0000
- Re: RE: Declarative programming requires a different mindset, From Stephen Green <stephengreenubl@gmail.com> on 12 Apr 2010 20:17:20 -0000
- Re: RE: Declarative programming requires a different mindset, From Norman Gray <norman@astro.gla.ac.uk> on 12 Apr 2010 20:32:32 -0000
- Re: RE: Declarative programming requires a different mindset, From Stephen Green <stephengreenubl@gmail.com> on 12 Apr 2010 21:02:26 -0000
- RE: RE: Declarative programming requires a different mindset, From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 12 Apr 2010 21:13:41 -0000
- Re: RE: Declarative programming requires a different mindset, From Norman Gray <norman@astro.gla.ac.uk> on 12 Apr 2010 22:02:23 -0000
- Re: RE: Declarative programming requires a different mindset, From ht@inf.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson) on 13 Apr 2010 10:56:30 -0000
- Re: RE: Declarative programming requires a different mindset, From Alexander Johannesen <alexander.johannesen@gmail.com> on 14 Apr 2010 12:36:02 -0000
- Re: RE: Declarative programming requires a different mindset, From Liz Fraley <caltonia@gmail.com> on 14 Apr 2010 17:18:53 -0000
- RE: RE: Declarative programming requires a differentmindset, From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 17 Apr 2010 16:01:47 -0000
- Re: RE: Declarative programming requires a different mindset, From Greg Hunt <greg@firmansyah.com> on 17 Apr 2010 16:47:45 -0000
- RE: RE: Declarative programming requires a different mindset, From "Glidden, Douglass A" <Douglass.A.Glidden@boeing.com> on 19 Apr 2010 11:50:38 -0000
- Re: RE: Declarative programming requires a different mindset, From Kendall Shaw <kshaw@kendallshaw.com> on 19 Apr 2010 18:49:33 -0000
RE: Declarative programming requires a different mindset, From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 11 Apr 2010 12:31:30 -0000
Followups by message-id references
RE: Declarative programming requires a differentmindset, From "stephengreenubl@gmail.com" <stephengreenubl@gmail.com> on 10 Apr 2010 21:19:06 -0000
Followups by message-id references
[ANN] SchemaLightener, SchemaFlattener, WSDLFlattener now together as a FREE tool, From "Paul Kiel" <paul@xmlhelpline.com> on 11 Apr 2010 21:54:36 -0000
Followups by message-id references
Re: [ANN] SchemaLightener, SchemaFlattener, WSDLFlattener nowtogether as a FREE tool, From <paul@xmlhelpline.com> on 13 Apr 2010 17:07:54 -0000
[ANN] Release of XMLmind XSL-FO Converter v4.4, From Olivier Ishacian <olivier@xmlmind.com> on 14 Apr 2010 12:16:40 -0000
xquery v1.1 tracking xquery x was Re: RE: Declarative programming requires a different mindset, From James Fuller <james.fuller.2007@gmail.com> on 14 Apr 2010 19:35:08 -0000
Followups by message-id references
Re: RE: xquery v1.1 tracking xquery x was Re: RE: Declarative programming requires a different mindset, From James Fuller <james.fuller.2007@gmail.com> on 15 Apr 2010 09:25:49 -0000
RE: RE: xquery v1.1 tracking xquery x was Re: RE: Declarative programming requires a different mindset, From "byomokesh" <byomokesh@codemantra.com> on 15 Apr 2010 10:19:56 -0000
RE: RE: xquery v1.1 tracking xquery x was Re: RE: Declarative programming requires a different mindset, From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 15 Apr 2010 11:19:32 -0000
XQueryX - re: was : re : was .... too many threads, From David <dlee@calldei.com> on 15 Apr 2010 11:32:11 -0000
Re: XQueryX - re: was : re : was .... too many threads, From David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk> on 15 Apr 2010 11:44:42 -0000
RE: XQueryX - re: was : re : was .... too many threads, From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 15 Apr 2010 11:49:53 -0000
Re: XQueryX - re: was : re : was .... too many threads, From David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk> on 15 Apr 2010 11:58:39 -0000
xqueryx insanity, From "Michael Sokolov" <sokolov@ifactory.com> on 16 Apr 2010 11:55:59 -0000
Re: XQueryX - re: was : re : was .... too many threads, From Jim Melton <jim.melton@oracle.com> on 18 Apr 2010 22:22:13 -0000
Re: RE: xquery v1.1 tracking xquery x was Re: RE: Declarative programming requires a different mindset, From Dave Pawson <davep@dpawson.co.uk> on 15 Apr 2010 07:01:28 -0000
Followups by message-id references
[ANN] Axl Library 0.6.2 'Starlight' release is ready!, From Francis Brosnan Blazquez <francis@aspl.es> on 16 Apr 2010 12:18:27 -0000
[ANN] Release BaseX 6.1, From Christian Grün <christian.gruen@gmail.com> on 18 Apr 2010 20:44:18 -0000
Deadline Extension: ICWMC 2010 || September 20-25, 2010 - Valencia, Spain, From Jaime Lloret Mauri<jlloret@dcom.upv.es> on 19 Apr 2010 00:53:01 -0000
Deadline Extension: ACCESS 2010 || September 20-25, 2010 - Valencia, Spain, From Sandra Sendra<sandra.sendra.upv@gmail.com> on 19 Apr 2010 11:08:56 -0000
Followups by message-id references
[ANN] Schematron news, From Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@allette.com.au> on 21 Apr 2010 08:22:13 -0000
Your Webinar Invitation: Join us for "Driving Open Government: The Essential Role of Standards", From "Dee Schur" <dee.schur@oasis-open.org> on 21 Apr 2010 11:42:31 -0000
+Hi+, From Stylus Studio <stylusstudio@gmail.com> on 22 Apr 2010 06:03:09 -0000
Call for reviewers: Journal of Network Protocols and Algorithms, From Editor-in-Chief NPA Journal<jlloret@dcom.upv.es> on 23 Apr 2010 15:58:00 -0000
Last Mile || InfoWare 2010 [ICCGI, ICWMC, INTERNET, ACCESS] September 20-25, 2010 - Valencia, Spain, From Sandra Sendra<sandra.sendra.upv@gmail.com> on 27 Apr 2010 10:35:45 -0000
[ANN] CodeSynthesis XSD 3.3.0 released, From Boris Kolpackov <boris@codesynthesis.com> on 28 Apr 2010 13:14:56 -0000
Mail converted by MHonArc 2.5.0b2
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0 |
 |
Atom 0.3 |
 |
|
Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats,
enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.
|
Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website.
they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please
click here.
|
|