[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: To namespace or not to Namespace ....
Michael Kay schrieb am 09.04.2010 um 21:53:57 (+0100) [RE: To namespace or not to Namespace ....]: > A simple clean design which would avoid these problems might be as > follows: > > (1) elements and attributes have hierarchic names, for example > org.fpml.invoice, which can always be written out in full if so > desired > > (2) if abbreviated names are wanted to reduce verbosity, then at the > outermost level of a document (perhaps in the internal DTD) prefixes > can be defined > > <!PREFIX f = org.fpml> > > allowing the element name to be written as <f:invoice> Ha! In the DTD! Good old DTD! :-) Cheers, -- Michael Ludwig
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|