[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: To namespace or not to Namespace ....
On Fri, 9 Apr 2010 21:53:57 +0100 "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> wrote: > > I've heard that namespaces is a bad design several times, but > > I cannot understand why it's a bad design, simply because I > > don't know what a good design is. Namespaces is all I know, I > > have no reason to believe it's a bad design unless someone > > point me to a good design, are there any? > > I agree, it's much easier to say what's wrong with the current design > than to propose something better. Though I don't think it would be > hard to design something better if backwards compatibility were not a > constraint. Would an easy way to get from 'old' to new suffice? Some xslt/Java/C transform of an instance which produces the new version? I don't think the backwards compatibility 'requirement' will allow a better design. -- regards -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.uk
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|