Re: RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication
On 2012-02-01 17:23, Richard Salz wrote: > My wording wasn't clear enough. > > At the time, we all thought "netascii for headers" was the right thing to > do. So much so that the question of codesets in headers *never came up.* > The entire IETF had this mindset, it was a truism, fundamental concept, > statement of fact, fundamental postulate, etc. It was not "what about > charset encodings? Never mind" > > I use the pronoun "we" on purpose; > http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec16.html#sec16 > ... Which is a good opportunity to remind people that IETF specifications are influenced by those people who care enough to show up and help. <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/wiki> Now is the time.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format