[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: XHTML 5 and validation

• From: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
• To: Jesper Tverskov <jesper.tverskov@gmail.com>
• Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 15:12:50 -0400

Jesper Tverskov scripsit:

> Very nice with the XHTML5 preset in Validator.nu. It is first time I
> have seen a link to the schema. Schematron! Is that the way it is
> going to be, no DTD or XML Schema?

Structural schemas are insufficient to capture all the restrictions of
valid XHTML5.  It would be possible to write a schema for XHTML5 (probably
a RELAX NG one), but it would be laxer than the requirements of HTML5 validity.

-- 
A poetical purist named Cowan           [that's me: cowan@ccil.org]
Once put the rest of us dowan.          [on xml-dev]
    "Your verse would be sweeter        http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
    If it only had metre
And rhymes that didn't force me to frowan."     [overpacked line!] --Michael Kay

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XHTML 5 and validation
    • From: Jesper Tverskov <jesper.tverskov@gmail.com>

• References:
  • XHTML 5 and validation
    • From: Jesper Tverskov <jesper.tverskov@gmail.com>
  • Re: XHTML 5 and validation
    • From: Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz>
  • Re: XHTML 5 and validation
    • From: Jesper Tverskov <jesper.tverskov@gmail.com>
  • Re: XHTML 5 and validation
    • From: Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz>
  • Re: XHTML 5 and validation
    • From: Jesper Tverskov <jesper.tverskov@gmail.com>