[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: XHTML 5 and validation

• From: Jesper Tverskov <jesper.tverskov@gmail.com>
• To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
• Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 21:18:21 +0200

John Cowan scripsit:
> Structural schemas are insufficient to capture all the restrictions of
> valid XHTML5.  It would be possible to write a schema for XHTML5 (probably
> a RELAX NG one), but it would be laxer than the requirements of HTML5 validity.

I guess the above is no longer true for XML Schema 1.1?

Cheers,
Jesper Tverskov
http://www.xmlplease.com

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XHTML 5 and validation
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
  • Re: XHTML 5 and validation
    • From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>

• References:
  • XHTML 5 and validation
    • From: Jesper Tverskov <jesper.tverskov@gmail.com>
  • Re: XHTML 5 and validation
    • From: Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz>
  • Re: XHTML 5 and validation
    • From: Jesper Tverskov <jesper.tverskov@gmail.com>
  • Re: XHTML 5 and validation
    • From: Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz>
  • Re: XHTML 5 and validation
    • From: Jesper Tverskov <jesper.tverskov@gmail.com>
  • Re: XHTML 5 and validation
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>