[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: XQueryX - re: was : re : was .... too many threads

• From: "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com>
• To: "'David'" <dlee@calldei.com>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 12:49:46 +0100

> 
> Any reverse parsers ?  XQuery -> XQueryX ?
> 

The W3C applets at http://www.w3.org/2010/02/qt-applets/ will do this.
> 
> Is that the experience of XQueryX ? Or do some people prefer 
> the XML syntax for human authorship ?
> 

You would have to be insane to write it by hand. Here is the XQueryX
equivalent of "2+2":

<?xml version="1.0"?>
<xqx:module xmlns:xqx="http://www.w3.org/2005/XQueryX"
            xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
            xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.w3.org/2005/XQueryX
                                http://www.w3.org/2005/XQueryX/xqueryx.xsd">
  <xqx:mainModule>
    <xqx:queryBody>
      <xqx:addOp>
        <xqx:firstOperand>
          <xqx:integerConstantExpr>
            <xqx:value>2</xqx:value>
          </xqx:integerConstantExpr>
        </xqx:firstOperand>
        <xqx:secondOperand>
          <xqx:integerConstantExpr>
            <xqx:value>2</xqx:value>
          </xqx:integerConstantExpr>
        </xqx:secondOperand>
      </xqx:addOp>
    </xqx:queryBody>
  </xqx:mainModule>
</xqx:module>

Regards,

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/
http://twitter.com/michaelhkay 

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XQueryX - re: was : re : was .... too many threads
    • From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>

• References:
  • xquery v1.1 tracking xquery x was Re: RE: Declarative programming requires a different mindset
    • From: James Fuller <james.fuller.2007@gmail.com>
  • RE: xquery v1.1 tracking xquery x was Re: RE: Declarative programming requires a different mindset
    • From: "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com>
  • Re: RE: xquery v1.1 tracking xquery x was Re: RE: Declarative programming requires a different mindset
    • From: Jim Melton <jim.melton@oracle.com>
  • Re: RE: xquery v1.1 tracking xquery x was Re: RE: Declarative programming requires a different mindset
    • From: Dave Pawson <davep@dpawson.co.uk>
  • Re: RE: xquery v1.1 tracking xquery x was Re: RE: Declarative programming requires a different mindset
    • From: James Fuller <james.fuller.2007@gmail.com>
  • RE: RE: xquery v1.1 tracking xquery x was Re: RE: Declarative programming requires a different mindset
    • From: "byomokesh" <byomokesh@codemantra.com>
  • RE: RE: xquery v1.1 tracking xquery x was Re: RE: Declarative programming requires a different mindset
    • From: "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com>
  • XQueryX - re: was : re : was .... too many threads
    • From: David <dlee@calldei.com>