[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: RE: xquery v1.1 tracking xquery x was Re: RE: De
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 17:45:10 -0600 Jim Melton <jim.melton@oracle.com> wrote: > If you're familiar with the XQueryX syntax, you'll know > that the XQueryX expression of a given query requires several times > as many characters (keystrokes, bytes, whatever measure you use) as > the same query expressed in the human-readable syntax. I wouldn't > call that a "shorthand" ;^) > > Hope this helps, > Jim I guess the previous post related to James Clark and relax NG, where the xml (probably) came first, and an abbreviated syntax was also offered as an alternative. Whether that model would be of use to xquery I don't know. I don't think it was meant that xqueryx was the shorthand for the 'freeform' (or so it seems) xquery. -- regards -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.uk
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|