[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Using Saxon 9 as a Schematron 1.5 back end
David Carlisle a écrit : >> Surely. We can find cases when one is better that the other. Naming >> elements has the advantage that in many cases we can identify the >> element in fault at a glance. > > yes, for humans names (including prefixes) are usually better. > In a schematron context though there's no standard way of expressing the > required namespace bindings to a following process, so (for machine use) > it's simpler to use the prefix free form which you can just expose as > a string for some later Xpath parser to pick up. > > In a system where you have full control of the pipeling mechanisms, the > tradefoffs may well be different... In fact, I did it for both usages : it's human readable AND it can be added in an XML report to be processed automatically In this last case, if I append my canonical path to an element (as text context or as an attribute), the relevant namespace declarations will be added if necessary -- Cordialement, /// (. .) --------ooO--(_)--Ooo-------- | Philippe Poulard | ----------------------------- http://reflex.gforge.inria.fr/ Have the RefleX !
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|