[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Using Saxon 9 as a Schematron 1.5 back end
> Surely. We can find cases when one is better that the other. Naming > elements has the advantage that in many cases we can identify the > element in fault at a glance. yes, for humans names (including prefixes) are usually better. In a schematron context though there's no standard way of expressing the required namespace bindings to a following process, so (for machine use) it's simpler to use the prefix free form which you can just expose as a string for some later Xpath parser to pick up. In a system where you have full control of the pipeling mechanisms, the tradefoffs may well be different... David ________________________________________________________________________ The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is: Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom. This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is powered by MessageLabs. ________________________________________________________________________
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|