[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: RDDL(2): new version up

• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: RDDL(2): new version up
• From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>
• Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 10:46:18 +0100
• In-reply-to: <AAD9A480-4A0A-11D8-81B2-000A95BA5A2C@o...>
• Organization: Dyomedea (http://dyomedea.com)
• References: <0494A708-49EF-11D8-B62D-000A95BA5A2C@o...> <1074458181.24853.364.camel@delleric> <AAD9A480-4A0A-11D8-81B2-000A95BA5A2C@o...>

On Mon, 2004-01-19 at 00:04, Jonathan Borden wrote:

> Ok, for the moment (until we get some consensus on whether to either 
> keep the same namespace for RDDL, or to use another)  I've placed the 
> new spec at
> 
> http://www.rddl.org/rddl2
> 
> *but* left the namespace the same in that document.

Thanks!

I think that we either need a separate namespace or to describe both
RDDL 1.0 and RDDL 2.0 in the RDDL directory for RDDL (or at least to
provide a link to RDDL 1.0).

Eric
-- 
Lisez-moi sur XMLfr.
                       http://xmlfr.org/index/person/eric+van+der+vlist/
Upcoming XML schema languages tutorial:
 - Santa Clara  -half day- (15/03/2004)        http://masl.to/?J24916E96
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric van der Vlist       http://xmlfr.org            http://dyomedea.com
(ISO) RELAX NG   ISBN:0-596-00421-4 http://oreilly.com/catalog/relax
(W3C) XML Schema ISBN:0-596-00252-1 http://oreilly.com/catalog/xmlschema
------------------------------------------------------------------------

• References:
  • RDDL(2): new version up
    • From: Jonathan Borden <jonathan@o...>
  • Re: RDDL(2): new version up
    • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>
  • Re: RDDL(2): new version up
    • From: Jonathan Borden <jonathan@o...>

• Prev by Date: Re: RDDL(2): new version up
• Next by Date: Re: Postel's law, exceptions
• Previous by thread: Re: RDDL(2): new version up
• Next by thread: Re: RDDL(2): new version up
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread