[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: RDDL(2): new version up
On Jan 18, 2004, at 3:36 PM, Eric van der Vlist wrote: > > >> - The syntax *is* simpler which is a Very Good Thing >> - XLink does not appear to have achieved traction >> - Because the syntax is substantially changed I've bumped the Version >> number up to 2.0 --- perhaps we ought use a different *namespace name* >> e.g. http://www.rddl.org/rddl2# -- let's hear discussion on this. > > Hmmm... that means that right now, all the existing RDDL documents have > a URI which describes a totally different vocabulary! That doesn't seem > right either. > Ok, for the moment (until we get some consensus on whether to either keep the same namespace for RDDL, or to use another) I've placed the new spec at http://www.rddl.org/rddl2 *but* left the namespace the same in that document. Jonathan
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|