[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Should xlink:arcrole or xlink:role be the primary way to dispatchon
> This approach covers it all. The purpose of each xlink is given > in human and > machine form, the nature of the resource itself is indicated by the role > attribute. In this example, we can clearly distinguish between > the purpose > and the nature of each resource, even when the same kind of > resource is used > for different purposes. Your example details exactly what I was imagining. Thanks for providing such a clear explanation. I especially appreciate your choice of words: purpose and nature! Words like "type" need to be wiped from our vocabulary. I'm assuming that you intend for a resource's purpose to be identified by its xlink:arcrole attribute and its nature by its xlink:role attribute, no? Jason.
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|