[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Should xlink:arcrole or xlink:role be the primary way to dispatchon
Jason Diamond said - > Your example details exactly what I was imagining. Thanks for providing such > a clear explanation. > > I especially appreciate your choice of words: purpose and nature! Words like > "type" need to be wiped from our vocabulary. > > I'm assuming that you intend for a resource's purpose to be identified by > its xlink:arcrole attribute and its nature by its xlink:role attribute, no? > Yes. To be more precise, it's the resource's purpose with respect to that particular xlink that is the arcrole. It might be used for a different purpose by another xlink. BTW, I received Jason's reply to my post BEFORE I had received a copy of my own post. That's confusing! Cheers, Tom P
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|