[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: URIs, names and well known RDDL names, was: Re: Quick edit

• From: ht@c... (Henry S. Thompson)
• To: Jonathan Borden <jborden@m...>
• Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2001 09:52:02 +0000

"Jonathan Borden" <jborden@m...> writes:

> Henry writes

> > "Jonathan Borden" <jborden@m...> writes:

> > > I also agree with Jason's analysis. Practically since RDDL was
> > > conceived, I've been going back and forth on what should an
> > > arcrole vs. role be w.r.t RDDL. Indeed one morning while driving
> > > to work, I suddenly became conviced that we'd got it all wrong,
> > > and confused an arcrole for a role. At the end of the day I'd
> > > conviced myself that arcrole was fine and that was that...

> > But you go on to contradict what Jason, Tim and I are all saying!  See
> > below.
> >
> > > This is how I see it:
> > >
> > > Software will use xlink:arcrole is to dispatch on a resource for a given
> > > URI.
> 
> Let me add one point to this. Personally I agree (strongly I might add) with
> your views on types and documents and if namespace URIs were used in a
> consistent fashion then this would clearly be the way to go. No question.
> The problem is that even among W3C RECs there fundamentally different uses
> of namespace URIs vs. DOCTYPES and the best example of this is XHTML. Of
> course this raises the old one vs. three namespace debate and I just want to
> avoid this debate here, that's all. I *do* want to use xlink:role to
> dispatch on type, its just that I don't want to loudly proclaim that type
> based dispatching is the primary way to dispatch.  That's why I think the
> best way to explain this is that we dispatch on the name of the link.
> 
> Perhaps we can define xlink:role implicitly as the root namespace URI if
> otherwise not specified.

This all sounds roughly right.  More on other threads.

ht
-- 
  Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
          W3C Fellow 1999--2001, part-time member of W3C Team
     2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
	    Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@c...
		     URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/

• References:
  • RE: URIs, names and well known RDDL names, was: Re: Quick edit
    • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@m...>
  • Re: URIs, names and well known RDDL names, was: Re: Quick edit
    • From: ht@c... (Henry S. Thompson)
  • Re: URIs, names and well known RDDL names, was: Re: Quick edit
    • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@m...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Should xlink:arcrole or xlink:role be the primary way to dispatchon related resources? was Re: URIs, names and well known RDDL names,
• Next by Date: Re: Schemas and entities (was "And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!")
• Previous by thread: Re: URIs, names and well known RDDL names, was: Re: Quick edit
• Next by thread: RDDL requirements
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread