[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: why distinctions within XHTML?
At 04:43 PM 9/7/99 -0600, roddey@u... wrote: > > > >>Somebody did the basic math in a comment: three variants of XHTML will >>very quickly add an order of magnitude to the complexity of the systems >>built with it. That's a deterrent to the use of XHTML, and discards the >>simplification that's long been at the core of the XML movement. >> > >Does not the 'X' in XHTML pretty much mean that technically there should be no >'non-strict' version? I mean if its HTML, its HTML. But, if its XML, then it >needs to be well formed XML. Nothing in the transitional and frameset flavors of XHTML 1.0 equate to not being well formed. If I correctly understand that to be your concern, it appears to not be an issue. Ann --- Author of Effective Web Design: Master the Essentials Coming in September --- Mastering XML Founder, WebGeek Communications http://www.webgeek.com Vice President-Finance, HTML Writers Guild http://www.hwg.org Director, HWG Online Education http://www.hwg.org/services/classes xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|