[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: why distinctions within XHTML?
roddey@u... scripsit: > Does not the 'X' in XHTML pretty much mean that technically there should be no > 'non-strict' version? I mean if its HTML, its HTML. But, if its XML, then it > needs to be well formed XML. I think that its going a little too far in the > direction of backwards compatability to do anything else. All parsers out there > now would reject non-strict HTML as not well formed anyway, right? I'm assuming > that non-strict (or traditional, or classic or whatever it is :-) means you > don't need a </p> for every <p> and so on, right? No. "Strict" means "guaranteed not to have deprecated element types and attributes" in the HTML context; it has nothing to do with SGML vs. XML. -- John Cowan cowan@c... I am a member of a civilization. --David Brin xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|