[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: confidentiality in W3C WGs
At 12:49 PM 9/13/99 +0200, Oren Ben-Kiki wrote: >The more this thread continues, the more I'm getting convinced there's >something wrong with the W3C. Obviously there is a reason why proper process >documentation is not being provided. Well, there is http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Process/ which is a public document. And I can't find the documentation just now, but I know (as co-editor of multiple W3C specs) that we are required to produce a written "disposition of comments" on all public (not w3c, public) comments sent to the address on the published WDs and PRs. And there are lots of them. And sometimes they're good comments that change the draft. Not that I'm saying W3C process is perfect. Nor that this debate isn't useful. -Tim xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|