PRODUCTS

DOWNLOAD

BUY

LEARN

SUPPORT

COMPANY

Cart

[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: XSLT 2.0 or XSLT 1.0 -- which is more elegant? (Wa Play the video Subject: RE: XSLT 2.0 or XSLT 1.0 -- which is more elegant? (Was: Re: mixing it up: REST+XML Namespaces + XLST) From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 12:08:20 +0100 > Why it can't be... let's say RNG ? :o) > Much of the elegance of RNG derives from the fact that it doesn't try to associate types with nodes, it only does validation. Michael Kay Current Thread Re: XSLT 2.0 or XSLT 1.0 -- which is more elegant? (Was: Re: mixing it up: REST+XML Namespaces + XLST), (continued) Jirka Kosek - 19 Apr 2005 10:30:52 -0000 Jeni Tennison - 19 Apr 2005 10:34:20 -0000 Dimitre Novatchev - 19 Apr 2005 10:48:33 -0000 Dimitre Novatchev - 19 Apr 2005 10:50:27 -0000 Michael Kay - 19 Apr 2005 11:08:48 -0000 <= Jirka Kosek - 19 Apr 2005 11:15:05 -0000 Michael Kay - 19 Apr 2005 11:48:07 -0000 Dimitre Novatchev - 19 Apr 2005 11:00:52 -0000 Michael Kay - 19 Apr 2005 10:38:59 -0000 <- Previous Index Next -> Re: XSLT 2.0 or XSLT 1.0 -- w, Dimitre Novatchev Thread Re: XSLT 2.0 or XSLT 1.0 -- w, Jirka Kosek Re: XSLT 2.0 or XSLT 1.0 -- w, Dimitre Novatchev Date Re: mixing it up: REST+XML Na, David Carlisle Month

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY! Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE! Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today. Email First Name Last Name Company Subscribe in XML format RSS 2.0 Atom 0.3

Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.