[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: XSLT 2.0 or XSLT 1.0 -- which is more elegant? (Wa
Dimitre Novatchev wrote: > What is really not elegant at all in XSLT 2.0 is the impossibility to > define user data types inline in a stylesheet -- forcing the > programmer to artificially separate in different files type definition > from type usage makes XSLT 2.0 rather unique... :( > > Of course, one would also like to see nested sequences, type classes > and type equations... Maybe XSLT 2.0 is just temporary language which will be shortly superseded by something called Haskslt or HasXSLT :-D -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Jirka Kosek e-mail: jirka@xxxxxxxx http://www.kosek.cz ------------------------------------------------------------------ Profesionalnm 9kolenm a poradenstvm v oblasti technologim XML. Podmvejte se na na9 novl spu9tln} web http://DocBook.cz Podrobn} pxehled 9kolenm http://xmlguru.cz/skoleni/ ------------------------------------------------------------------ [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/x-pkcs7-signature which had a name of smime.p7s]
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|