PRODUCTS

DOWNLOAD

BUY

LEARN

SUPPORT

COMPANY

Cart

[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: XSLT 2.0 or XSLT 1.0 -- which is more elegant? (Wa Play the video Subject: Re: XSLT 2.0 or XSLT 1.0 -- which is more elegant? (Was: Re: mixing it up: REST+XML Namespaces + XLST) From: Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 20:50:11 +1000 > A much better name in this particular case would be "define-schema" Even better: define-type Cheers, Dimitre Novatchev. Current Thread XSLT 2.0 or XSLT 1.0 -- which is more elegant? (Was: Re: mixing it up: REST+XML Namespaces + XLST), (continued) Dimitre Novatchev - 19 Apr 2005 10:23:17 -0000 Jirka Kosek - 19 Apr 2005 10:30:52 -0000 Jeni Tennison - 19 Apr 2005 10:34:20 -0000 Dimitre Novatchev - 19 Apr 2005 10:48:33 -0000 Dimitre Novatchev - 19 Apr 2005 10:50:27 -0000 <= Michael Kay - 19 Apr 2005 11:08:48 -0000 Jirka Kosek - 19 Apr 2005 11:15:05 -0000 Michael Kay - 19 Apr 2005 11:48:07 -0000 Dimitre Novatchev - 19 Apr 2005 11:00:52 -0000 <- Previous Index Next -> Re: XSLT 2.0 or XSLT 1.0 -- w, Dimitre Novatchev Thread RE: XSLT 2.0 or XSLT 1.0 -- w, Michael Kay Re: XSLT 2.0 or XSLT 1.0 -- w, Eric van der Vlist Date Re: mixing it up: REST+XML Na, James Fuller Month

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY! Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE! Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today. Email First Name Last Name Company Subscribe in XML format RSS 2.0 Atom 0.3

Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.