[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: XSLT 2.0 or XSLT 1.0 -- which is more elegant? (Wa

Subject: Re: XSLT 2.0 or XSLT 1.0 -- which is more elegant? (Was: Re: mixing it up: REST+XML Namespaces + XLST)
From: Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 21:00:38 +1000
Re:  XSLT 2.0 or XSLT 1.0 -- which is more elegant? (Wa
Hi Jeni,

On 4/19/05, Jeni Tennison <jeni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Dimitre,
>
> > What is really not elegant at all in XSLT 2.0 is the impossibility to
> > define user data types inline in a stylesheet  -- forcing the
> > programmer to artificially separate in different files type definition
> > from type usage makes XSLT 2.0 rather unique... :(
>
> Since the November 2004 Working Draft, you can nest a (WXS) schema
> within an <xsl:import-schema> element, so you can define data types
> within the stylesheet module if you want. This only applies to
> Schema-Aware XSLT processors, of course.


Then we have two quite different languages.


Cheers,
Dimitre.


>
> Cheers,
>
> Jeni
>
> ---
> Jeni Tennison
> http://www.jenitennison.com/

Current Thread

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.