[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: RE: The XML abstraction leaks
Roger, I love abstractions, but to me the abstraction lies in how XML conceptually packages information rather than the textual protocol that is the language itself. So to me the abstraction **behind** XML is that information can be structured as a nested set of elements that have unordered (and therefore necessarily labeled) attributes and ordered content (other elements, text nodes, processing instructions, comments, etc.) associated to them. On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 1:50 PM, Costello, Roger L. <costello@mitre.org> wrote: > Thank you David and Michael. I would like to follow up please. > > > > I really am fascinated by the topic of abstractions and leaky abstractions. > I hope that lots of people will pitch in with their thoughts and opinions on > this topic. > > > > 1. What is “the XML abstraction”? I said that it is this: > > > > An XML document contains data and the data > is surrounded (delimited) by markers. More > concretely, an XML document contains pairs > of start-tags and end-tags, sandwiched between > them is character data and possibly other > start-tag, end-tag pairs. > > > > Do you agree that that is the XML abstraction? If not, would you provide > your definition of “the XML abstraction” please? > > > > 2. What is a “leaky abstraction”? From reading Joel Spolsky’s article as > well as Peter Seibel’s description [1] I have arrived at this definition: > > > > The XML abstraction leaks when users must > understand to some extent how software that > implements the XML abstraction—the XML > processor—works internally. > > > > Do you agree with that? If not, would you provide your definition of what it > means for the XML abstraction to leak please? > > > > 3. Would you identify a leak in the XML abstraction please? > > > > /Roger > > > > [1] Peter Seibel has a wonderful discussion of leaky abstractions in his > book, Practical Common Lisp. He gives an awesome example of a user-defined > function (abstraction) that leaks. > > -- "A false conclusion, once arrived at and widely accepted is not dislodged easily, and the less it is understood, the more tenaciously it is held." - Cantor's Law of Preservation of Ignorance.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|