[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: RE: XML Schema: What does it *really* mean to declare an e

• From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
• To: Chris Maloney <voldrani@gmail.com>
• Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 01:08:12 +0000

On 02/01/2013 00:12, Chris Maloney wrote:
> I agree with the responses so far to Roger, with one important caveat,
> which ties in with the discussions on Unicode that he recently led.
> It is possible to truly change, and thus obfuscate, your element names
> if you use, for example, mathematical alphanumerics.
>
> Here's a "W" that's not really a "W", it's a "mathematical script
> capital W" (U+1D4B2) and this would be a completely different element
> (may or may not show up in your mail reader):
>
> <𝓦>...</𝓦>


An indispensable tool for such usage:

http://www.ewellic.org/mathtext.html


   ``Dazzle your friends by adding headlines and emphasis! Confuse your 
enemies by obfuscating your text! Annoy the hell out of the Unicode 
Technical Committee!''

David

• References:
  • XML Schema: What does it *really* mean to declare an element?
    • From: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org>
  • RE: XML Schema: What does it *really* mean to declare an element?
    • From: David Lee <dlee@calldei.com>
  • Re: RE: XML Schema: What does it *really* mean to declarean element?
    • From: Chris Maloney <voldrani@gmail.com>